this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

8004 readers
2431 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kbal@fedia.io 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Remind me, how was Doug Ford going to pay for that $100 billion highway?

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

By cutting healthcare and extensively fining anyone who owns a bicycle.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Gutting and stripping every single public service and government asset and selling it off to the first person that asks.

And then giving the money to his pals.

Essentially conservative basics 101.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago

Are there any more details for this?

We will freeze income taxes for the 98.2% of Ontarians making under $220,000 a year.

Are we talking just increasing top bracket, more brackets, wealth tax?

Link to the PDF of their platform

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 16 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Ontario's NDP and Liberals are both pledging tens of billions of dollars in new spending to pay for their campaign promises, but are taking different approaches to the other side of the ledger, with the NDP proposing wealth taxes and the Liberals eyeing "efficiencies."

Sounds like more austerity and tax cuts from the libs. They really want the cons to win I guess. Hopefully they aren't thinking about some sort of department to oversee these efficiencies...

The concept that the liberals think they can materialise $28B out of thin air is laughable.

I'm all for higher taxes on the very wealthy.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW WEALTH TAX NOW

It has a certain ring to it.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If people gave a shit about where the money is coming from, Doug Ford would be tanking in the polls as he has obviously impossible to fund proposals. Whatever the parties say in their funding blurbs just serves the purpose of telling their potential voter base what's going to happen to their taxes. In the end, the difference always comes from debt and that's OK. So reality tells me funding proposals aren't what wins or loses elections. The efficiencies proposal is great because it works just like it worked for Ford. It's nebulous, it allows for saying you're doing it while not achieving anything with it. Therefore it allows for not doing austerity in reality. Of course it also allows for austerity. It's why I'd look at the rest of the platform details for clues on that.