this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
401 points (82.7% liked)

Progressive Politics

1912 readers
346 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

To fact check the fact check: There doesn't seem to be a list of "dictatorships" on the Freedom house website. Interesting that they're missing a link to that source isn't it? Their point hinges on a listing from some website I've never heard of and they don't link to it? A little sus.

Freedom house does have a listing of countries that are "free", "not free", and "partly free" here: https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores

Note that Israel is considered a free country, and Gaza and the West Bank are listed as "not free". So the methodology of used by the fact checker would consider providing aid to countries like Egypt, Jordan, and Turkey would count against the US while giving aid to Israel would be a positive. Providing aid to Palestine would be a double negative as the West Bank and Gaza are counted separately.

Also note that Ukraine is listed as "Partly Free" so I'm not sure whether the fact-checker is labeling Ukraine as a "dicatorship". Trump called Zelenskyy a dictator, so who knows?

Seems to me the fact checker was just cooking the books to promote a narrative that what Trump is doing is the status quo. Trump is surrendering to a dictatorship that's a threat to a great many democracies. It's not at all comparable to providing aid to a country that has shitty leaders, but shitty leaders that will fight against ISIS and/or al Qadea. If those groups were successful it would not increase freedom in they countries they exist in.

And who knows who the fact-checker is? Elon Musk controls everything on that site.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He just said it supported democracy, not that it didn't ALSO support dictatorships!

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 117 points 3 days ago (21 children)

"Technically, the United States didn't get bad, it's always been bad! It only got worse!" isn't the flex a lot of leftists think it is.

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What's wrong with the message "We should be doing better, not worse"?

Seems preferable to the "hurt people who also want the things I have" that seems the core of conservatism.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

What's wrong with it is it's normalizing Donald Trump. Like, actually pointing at Trump and saying "this is normal." US democracy is on life support, and calling this business-as-usual is like telling people there's nothing to see here while he yanks and tugs on the plug.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] tastysaganaki@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It’s obviously unclear who actually fact checked Sanders here, but assuming it is indeed in good faith, this is why it’s so hard to mount a resistance to the fascism the US now has in power. There’s countless examples, but more or less they all revolve around (insert name) not being left enough or not being good enough, or in this case, not being honest enough. I don’t even disagree with the countless replies here that are rightfully pointing out that the US has propped up many non-democratic governments all over the world for its own moneyed and geopolitical interests - no shit. And I for one don’t defend it. But as an American myself who’s on the left, I’d gladly take Sanders for all his flaws compared to the bullshit fascist regime my country now has. I just don’t see how shitting on Sanders in this way is truly constructive in any capacity. I should add the caveat- by all means critique him, correct anything false he says- but to totally disregard him as this negative force? To my mind though, this is the so-called Internet left’s favorite pastime- shit talk people actually doing stuff, all while offering zero concrete proposals or actions themselves to make the country better. It’s very easy to sit and post to Lemmy about your self proclaimed radical leftist views, but your views mean fuck all if they never get implemented. Perhaps just sitting in your online echo chamber is all you really want though, so you can feel good about your personal political and social beliefs.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes, the difference being that the fascists want to use the counter-arguments to do even shittier things. “We’re a shitty country, so you libs don’t get to tell us we do good things sometimes, we’re the greatest country ever! Get out of the way so we can do objectively shittier things!”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] banshee@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The same people would assert that we shouldn't be meddling in other countries affairs to promote democracy.

I'm not defending our history here - some of it is pretty reprehensible.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

A lot of it is pretty reprehensible. That being said, in the last 150 years, every single time that the US goes isolationist, we've had a world war.....

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Yea, it’s true we suck. We should probably stop sucking so bad.

[–] segabased@lemmy.zip 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Who needs the CIA when we have useful idiots that sink any working class movement with shit like this

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If a working class movement needs to lie and gaslight people into American exceptionalism it is not a working class movement.

[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately sanders is one of our better actors within the institution. Many leftists would have been happy and welcoming of a sanders administration for 2 terms. FDR was also partially aligned with fascists but as far as presidential administrations go he did the most for the working class that anyone ever did(thankfully he was elected for 4 terms) sanders however flawed he may be would have been as close to a new age fdr as we were ever going tk get and this is why the dnc shot themselves in the foot and disgraced their electorate. The democratic party is a center right party so yes bernie sanders is a little too close to center to be a real leftist and he compromises too much with centrists and conservatives but this is the only way to get things done within a partisan class dictatorship we have.

But since the dnc made it clear they would rather move to the right and attempt to court conservative voters rather than move even a centimeter to the left they made it crystal clear the only way to remedy the rot and corruption of corporatist control in our political system is a full on revolution/ class war which has been waged against the working class for the last 5-6 decades at least.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm a big Sanders supporter and totally get where youre coming from, but facts are facts. Bernie is right a ton of the time. He can be wrong once in a while without it damaging his reputation. When someone's wrong, they should be called out regardless of whether you agree with them the rest of the time.

[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I am not saying he is never wrong. Im just saying he is one of the better representatives we have. Im very far left and i regularly describe my political ideology as saying i’m so far left I make Bernie Sanders look like Newt Geingrich. But I would have been much happier with our society if we just got finished with 2 terms of a Sanders administration as opposed to the garbage we were stuck with because of the billionaire wall street military and prison industry profiteer owned neo liberal DNC’s deliberate self sabotage. But we still have to listen to delulu neo liberal democrat party supporters falling in line and blaming voters/ ignoring the reality wven thiugh the democrats chose to move further to the right and court republicans even accepting endorsements from the Cheney and bush families. They will do anything to ignore the reality that our presidential elections are most definitely rigged by financial influence just like the rest of our political system. FDR was somewhat slightly fascist aligned but he was the best president our country has ever had. And we can see that sanders is also flawed in similar ways but sometimes we have to weigh the pros and cons. Im not saying vote for the lesser of tw evils but rather that sometimes the good ideas and policies a candidate has can outweigh the negative aspects of their record/ political platform/ideology.

[–] segabased@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Anyone that meets the working class where they are to build class consciousness in terms they understand are building the working class movement.

But I guess we can nitpick and siphon the air out of any sort of potential for progress by doing the work of fascist apologists. Jailing and killing socialists will really bring about the perfect revolution we need

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Are non yanks allowed to factcheck Sanders' pro USA propaganda?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The good thing about all this is that once Trump is done, and one day he will be done, the next guy who follows can finally build something good from the ground up

Chabging how American elections work, for example, has always been impossible. After this shit show, the pieces that are left will be broken enough to rebuild something good

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

The good thing about all this is that once Trump is done, and one day he will be done, the next guy who follows can finally build something good from the ground up

Will they though? Maybe, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Americans will NEVER accept more than two parties.

Sadly it’s what you need so that the whole country won’t flip-flop every 4 years. One 10-15 congressman party who the major parties need to make concessions to

[–] fff45667@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

With ranked choice voting, they would.

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think no more than two parties would dominate, even in a ranked choice system. But they would evolve more representatively: party platforms are shaped by issue polling, with the ballot box being both the ultimate poll but also obscure on what exactly the detailed driving issues are.

Ranked choice voting would give single-issue parties a real seat at the ballot box, and enable the two big parties to more accurately adjust their platforms to target voters who first-choiced a little party and second-choiced one of the big ones.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right now they don't have more than two parties not because they don't want to but basically because they can't.

Once that would be possible watch everyone vote for who they actually want to vote for. Within no time you'd be seeing dozens of parties pop up

[–] Lyrl@lemm.ee 1 points 22 hours ago

Australia has had ranked choice voting for decades. Wikipedia describes their system as a "mild" two-party system. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_Australia

I don't see any reason the US would have a different outcome. But I believe transitioning from our current "hard" two-party system to a "mild" one would be a huge positive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thefrozenorth@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 days ago (14 children)

This is not fact checking. This is gaslighting. The fact that the USA has been supporting dictators for decades does not change or alter what Bernie is saying.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Yes it does. Supporting countries that happen to be democracies as well as supporting countries that happen to be dictatorships according to your national interests is far different from supporting democracy as a goal.

[–] yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago

...Bernie said the US supported democracy. This is, in every conceivable way, a complete and total lie.

It's such a ridiculous lie that you wouldn't be able to say just those words after the year 1805.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] splonglo@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Another nit-pick by the circular firing squad of so-called progressives.

True American Patriots like Bernie understand that the USA was mearly subverted away from the Light of Democracy by malign actors.

[–] habitualcynic@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Gaslighting from fascist twitter users more than circling firing squad. Definitely took an opportunity to try to dig at the GOAT.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I also seen a lot of fascists making fake progressive accounts to boost "cancel culture" against the left, that also regularly drop a lot of dogwhistles, especially after each successful campaigns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bernie: 250 years the US has supported democracies

Net-a-yahoo: #whatAbout when they supported bad people?

World: uh, them too? You didn't actually refute Bernie's statement.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 days ago (8 children)

You can do both. Saying they've supported dictatorships doesn't mean they haven't also supported democracy. It's bordering on being a non sequitur.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If the US ever supports democracy, it is purely by accident.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Where we read "democracy", they read "economic benefit" or "geopolitical benefit". As far as I'm aware, any "democratic movement" that the US has ever supported has been either to get rid of a not sufficiently capitalist regime (whether or not they were democratic), or for some other geopolitical strategic reason.

I haven't heard of a single example of the US supporting a democracy purely for democracy's sake. Sometimes it just so happens that the goals of supporting democracy and getting rid of pesky regimes that pose an economic or strategic obstacle align.

Not to mention that the US has been involved in regime change of many democracies over the last 80 years because they weren't sufficiently friendly to American companies or didn't support American strategic goals strongly enough. This is open, well-documented history. The CIA admits to many of the ones which were done at least 50 years ago.

Here is a list to get started: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 days ago

Of course they provide for the dictatorships, who do you think put them there in the first place? It's called responsible parenting sweaty 💅

[–] sxan@midwest.social 21 points 3 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ShyCake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago

Bless this old man's heart, I only wish it were true

[–] isgleas@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 days ago

arewethebaddies.gif

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Freedom House doesn't label places as "dictatorships." So this is suspect right off the bat. They use a "freedom index."

No doubt the figure from 2015 includes significant support and training to Afghanistan, labeled with a score of 6 out of 100. Does that count as supporting a dictatorship? No.

If we sell weapons to the Saudis to fight Iranian creep, is that supporting dictatorship? Maybe a little. No question of Iran and Saudi, Iran is a much less free and much worse dictatorship. Sometimes that's just how progress looks.

This "fact check" is at best highly misleading, bordering on false.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago

Dictators are good when they steal resources from the people and share them with us.

load more comments
view more: next ›