this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
589 points (95.8% liked)

Political Memes

7133 readers
3519 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mcbang2000@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

hey we're gonna get a lot of great data from all the crashes

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

We expect explosive results!

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Spirit airlines! Yeah that's the spirit!

No, I meant your spirit! There goes a piece, and another piece! Your spirit has so many god dammed pieces dude! Look at all those pieces!

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Fuck Elon Musk, Fuck Privatized Flight Control, Fuck the entire Trump Admin

But in all fairness, they're intentionally trying to build rockets with cheaper materials, them blowing up is expected for a very long time going forward, and is definitely worth it in the long run. If somebody like Blue Origin were in charge, the fucking Natural Gas rocket company, that would be much worse.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Trump appointed Bridenstone his first term. There was an explicit goal of privatizing space exploration and moving programs from in-house NASA (“failure is not an option”) to the wonders of letting Musk and Bezos light our tax dollars on fire.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If Trump keeps this shit up I might have to stop blaming everything bad on Ronald Reagan, soon.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

His current nominee is a billionaire known for providing training to militaries, a payment processing company, and buying his way into becoming an astronaut.

The only part of NASA that won’t be stripped and sold for parts will be whatever can be retooled into Space Force.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

the fucking Natural Gas rocket company

What does this mean? Starship uses methane too, you know?

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Importantly they use methane because you can generate methane on Mars(especially if you bring some spare hydrogen).

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They say this a lot, so I expect they have some machinery running to demonstrate the technology here on earth? We have plenty of hydrogen here after all.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Correct. It’s called the Sabatier reaction and it’s over 100 years old.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So where are the machines on earth demonstrating the process?

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oddly enough when the process was demonstrated by French scientists in the 1800s they did it in space, so the earth has yet to see this advanced technology.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Since it's been around so long, surely there exists a plant somewhere that is creating methane at scale? Or a system has been designed that will produce enough methane to fill a starship economically? This problem must be long solved, I should be able to buy an off the shelf methane generator, no?

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you being obtuse or do you have a point? A Sabatier reactor has flown on the ISS, so they exist clearly. Audi had a pilot plant producing methane using this method as recently as 10 years ago.

It's obvious the technology exists, and has been tested in space, and is viable on mars according to numerous studies dating back from the 80s to current day.

Do you have any proof to the contrary? I'm a huge space nerd so if there's a fatal flaw in this plan I'd like to know.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My point is, if there's not a simple box you can buy that makes methane on earth, we're a long way away from a methane factory on Mars. Spacex has said they're not working on it and hope someone else does. Without this magical machine there will be no people landing on Mars. Or, more specifically, no people leaving Mars.

My further point is, the whole Mars thing is just a bullshit ruse to trick us into funding the launch of capitalism into space.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

magical machine bullshit ruse to trick us into funding the launch of capitalism into space

Your ideology begets your conclusions. You are a troll, intentional or not.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Fair. But before I leave, let me challenge you to consider how your ideology might be determining your own conclusions.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We've never launched from mars much less have an entire manufacturing plant and refueling station built, so it doesnt really seem pertinent at this juncture to be launching Vulcan rockets and frequent satellites that that technology.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

They use methane because it's cheap and light. Any other justification is just bullshit greenwashing.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have flown this experiment on the ISS. It is a chemical process that is over 100 years old and is well understood.

It’s also the only way to lift any significant mass off of mars, because as you said we have no manufacturing or refueling there. So the rocket must refuel itself.

It then follows that if Mars is the next major target of exploration, and methane is cheap and abundant, why not get started now? The alternative is to spend a decade qualifying an engine for human space flight after the green light for a crewed mission.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Alright cool but we've never used these rockets anywhere other than earth. Their development for future use isn't an excuse to use them over other types currently.

Also, Mars has lower gravity and little to no atmosphere, there are definitely other ways in that pointless hypothetical.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

SpaceX uses natural gas on anything equipped with a Raptor engine, this is true, but it wasn't the company's primary accomplishment or field of research like with Blue Origin.

It looks like starting with BE-7 Blue Origin started using Hydrogen and are now researching potential nuclear fuel options, I hadn't even heard of these engines before today, it looks like they've never been used outside of testing phase, so I suppose I might have been overly critical.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So what were you trying to say when you said "fucking natural gas rocket engine company?"

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you read my comment you will see that Blue Origin has primarily developed and sold Natural Gas rocket engines. Blue Origin is the Jeff Bezos owned Fucking Natural Gas Rocket Engine Company. What part about this is unclear to you?

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The part where your not calling Elon Musk's fucking natural gas rocket engine company a Fucking Natural Gas Rocket Engine Company

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

SpaceX also had the Merlin, Kestrel, and Falcon series which were LOX/RP-1 fueled and they also had the Draco series which were Hydrazine fuel.

Fuck both of them, but Blue Origin is most well known for their Natural Gas rocketry.

[–] JollyBrancher@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

People occasionally bring up how Canada's ATC is private. Those people always forget there are still strict government contracts with tight regulations. There's no huge influence on "good" healthcare and benefits as an excuse for lower pay and QOL for the same job in the US. Comparing working in the *US to Canadian private sector is comparing apples to shit oranges.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago
[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey now, rockets are hard.

(Elon tweeted that in case you didn't know)

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As opposed to air traffic control which is notoriously easy /s

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isn't one of the other options a company that left 2 people in space?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's almost like corps are in favor of profit over people.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

In Boeing's case, they appear to be neither for people nor profit.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope, it's all black and white nowadays. This timeline is weird. Everything is pure black and white.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Only by trump and musk. The astronaut's statements are all over the place:

Did politics influence NASA's decision for you to stay longer in space?

Wilmore: From my standpoint, politics is not playing into this at all. From our standpoint, I think that they would agree, we came up prepared to stay long, even though we plan to stay short. That's what we do in human spaceflight. That's what your nation's human space flight program is all about, planning for unknown, unexpected contingencies. And we did that, and that's why we flowed right into Crew 9, into Expedition 72 as we did. And it was somewhat of a seamless transition, because we had planned ahead for it, and we were prepared.

Elon Musk said he made an offer to bring Butch and Suni home last year, but it was denied by the White House. Is this true?

Wilmore: I can only say that Mr. Musk, what he says, is absolutely factual. We have no information on that, though, whatsoever; what was offered, what was not offered; who it was offered to, how that process went. That's information that we simply don't have. So I believe him. I don't know all those details, and I don't think any of us really can give you the answer that maybe that you would be hoping for.

One of astronauts said they dont think its politized at all, that just how things are. Then seconds later said Musk saying it was politcal is absolutely correct, but also they had no information at all proving that.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

We are now blaming the victims. lol. I'm just done with this country. I don't know why I even comment on this shit anymore. Saddest country on the planet. Go on, keep commenting and say whatever you want.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I’ll take- “Exploding Airplanes” for $400, Alex.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're called "test flights". They're tests, shit will fail. Shit will explode, because..... they're test flights. Can we find better arguments than this silliness, please?

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay.

I would not like someone that treats everything like a test flight program to run the FAA, or in fact run anything that's not a test flight program.

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's a better way of putting it, but you could also argue that that person does have experience since their test flights are done on a higher level than regular flights (they test space flights), and your regular FAA flights are a breeze to them? This is not the point anyway. Oh well.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I think coordinating 45000 flights a day is more complicated than following regulations to launch 1 rocket.