this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
452 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

68240 readers
3669 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 127 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)
  • 30-day battery life
  • open source OS

🫨

[–] rImITywR@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Does it use just standard watch bands? It looks like it, but I didn't see it mentioned.

One of the things I find ridiculous about other smart watches is that they use proprietary bands. When I found out that people are paying $60+ for a silicon band for an Apple watch, it blew my mind. Also that people put screen protectors or cases on their Apple watches because their $500+ watch doesn't even have a crystal lens, and is prone to scratching.

[–] Pfhortune@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, the announcement blog post states they use standard 22mm watch bands, as the original Pebbles did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 weeks ago

The Bangle.js is around too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 78 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm pretty excited about this; my Pebble Time was the best watch I've even owned - smart or otherwise.

That said, I don't think I'm going to be preordering this given how badly the last Pebble Kickstarter went. For those who weren't around at the time, Pebble (whose CEO is behind this venture) built his whole business around Kickstarter. The first 2 generations were wildly successful, but for the third generation they massively overextended themselves trying to get hardware into mainstream retailers, prioritised building stock for retail channels (because contracts) and ran out of cash before shipping for the majority of backers who had bankrolled this whole thing. Eventually everyone who hadn't had their orders fulfilled got a refund, but that was only because FitBit decided to buy them. Eric seems like a nice guy and great at the technology - and I'm not saying that I could run a business any better - but I think I'll wait until there is stock on hand for me to buy outright before I hand over my cash

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

From their FAQ, emphasis mine:

You shouldn’t get one if…

You need a perfectly polished smartwatch.Β This project is a labour of love rather than a startup trying to sell millions of watches. There may be some rough edges (literally). Things will get delayed. Some features will not be ready at launch. Things could break. Things could not last as long as you’d like. The only thing we can guarantee is that it will be awesome and a lot of fun! Every time you look down at your watch, you will smile

So yeah, I’d say your take is pretty accurate. At least they’re honest lol

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

He also screwed a lot of the employees on the way out from Pebble, and he also bailed on Beeper the minute it got complicated. Sold it to Matt Mullenweg a year or two after getting pimp-slapped by Apple because he had no real plan for what to do if Apple started banning the devices he was using as Matrix bridges. He gave up after like three days, it was honestly genuinely pathetic. This was a paid service and he fucked it all up for anyone using iMessage on it.

I have personal experiences with Beeper that make me less than trust Eric Migicovsky, and I really don't think he seems like a "nice guy." He actively sucks, doesn't have plans for sustainability and then sells it all off to someone else at a personal profit while the people doing the actual work get fucked out of a job.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep im also going to wait til its out to make a judgement call.

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Ditto, even though I’m in the market to replace my smartwatch since the buttons fell off.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

I always feel nervous preordering anything. I got a new Fitbit so I think I have some time before it fails so I can see how this rePebble works out. If it is as good as it looks I might just get it. 30 day estimated battery life is amazing

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 49 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

I am wearing my OG Kickstarter Pebble right now, 12 years and still getting 8 days battery out of it.

I think I will be getting a new Core Time 2

Edit: added picture

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It has the screen tearing issue, which can't be fixed because it is one of the original ones which are glued together.

I have to have it on the analogue watch face so the screen refreshes every second. But it has outlasted the 4 other watches I tried.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lostbit@feddit.nl 41 points 2 weeks ago

too bad its a US based company

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 39 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Why would they choose to name the watch "Core 2 Duo" when that's the name of an Intel processor? And why are both watches a "2" variant? They need a new marketing person.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

And why are both watches a β€œ2” variant?

Because this is the next generation of the original Pebble watches.

Core 2 Duo

I'll actually be surprised if this makes it to launch without Intel perhaps making a few legal calls and prompting a device name change.

[–] rImITywR@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The most recent Intel Core 2 Duo was discontinued in 2008. I doubt Intel would be able to convince anyone that this is a competing product or would cause any customer confusion. No one is going to be looking for a low end processor from over a decade ago and accidentally buy a watch.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The point is not that it is being used, the point is that corporations must protect their trademarks or else they may lose the exclusive rights to them. Intel also still uses the "Core" branding on their modern CPU's so it wouldn't be a stretch for them to try and continue legally protecting "Core 2 Duo" under the guise of retaining the "Core" part of their trademarks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

Corporations are extremely protective about their branding, even if it’s for discontinued products. If this product gets any negative press, it can still affect their branding if people associate it with Intel.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

Wouldn't this be the fourth generation? Pebble Time was the second generation and Pebble 2 was the third generation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

when that’s the name of an Intel processor?

It's totally a reference to that, it has to pretty much... Why? Idk, nostalgia? Duo as in black and white maybe

load more comments (1 replies)

That was my first thought as well. "Intel gonna sue somebody."

[–] _____@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Core 2 Duo is also a terrible name from Intel in the first place. I did place my repebble order, hopefully it will serve me well.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Wait, the basic version has a compas and barometer without a heart rate monitor, but the more expensive one has a heart rate monitor and no barometer or compass? Why?

[–] tree@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He wasn't going to add compass because most people don't use it, but then he added it to the Core 2 Duo as a favor to a friend who helped on that version and wanted a compass in it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/pebble/comments/1jea5cc/ama_with_eric_migicovsky_lets_talk_about_the_new/migw1ct/

[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Because that's the feature people actually want. The biggest use of these watches is having an active heart rate monitor, as evident by even most of the cheaper watches having them.

Pebble is now playing a gambit, whereby they think they will sell more of the premium model to people who will be using it for exercise and health reasons.

Either that, or the hardware chosen specifically separates the heart rate monitor so that vendors strike a better deal with the factories to get specially designed chips.

Either way, someone is getting taken for a ride.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Pebble is now playing a gambit, whereby they think they will sell more of the premium model to people who will be using it for exercise and health reasons.

There's an explicit line in their site that says these are not made to be fitness trackers, and that garmin are good for that (or some other brand, can't remember). It would be very odd to say that if it was their target.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For anyone looking for a similar device in the interim (long battery, open source) the PineTime is a great device.

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is neat but the selling point for me with the Pebble is the e-ink display. If repebble fails though, my next watch will be a Pine. Hopefully my Versa 2 holds on for a bit longer 🀞

[–] lime@feddit.nu 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

it's an "e-paper" display, which annoyingly is nothing like an e-ink display. it's an LCD with a memory chip in it. the bangle.js also has one, which can do eight colors. so better than the black and white one, but worse than the 64-color one. also it's half the price of the cheaper pebble...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AliasVortex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Got a PineTime for Christmas and so far been very pleased with it. I found the PineTimeStyle watchface and it's been a bit like coming home to Pebble, but I do miss the wide array of watchface choices and effortless customization.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mac@lemm.ee 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

If it's open source, could someone potentially develop an app for it to control devices in home assistant? Would love to be able to control my room lights from my watch, and don't think it's possible on my Xiaomi watch fit 3 connected to gadgetbridge.

I recognize that there would also need to be work done in the app to support this as the watch only supports BLE

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

There are a couple already, e.g. https://github.com/Willow-Systems/pebble-home-assistant

What's even cooler is that the nRF52840 chip that they will use has ZigBee support, which theoretically means it can talk to your network directly if software supports it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

It's open source.

[–] mac@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Price seems kinda steep for a device that doesn't have sleep/SpO2/Stress and HRV tracking capabilities

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I am wondering/hoping if another company will step up and make a PebbleOS based watch with these capabilities.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Anyone remember the screen tearing issue that fucked basically 100% of screens from pebble? I remember.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NineMileTower@midwest.social 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Are they going to support it with an app?

Ope!

We will publish a companion mobile app for Android and iOS. My friend and past Pebble colleague, Steve, recently joined us to lead this effort. He’s joining crc32, long-time Cobble developer, who has been working with me since last summer. We’ll also be working on an updated SDK for creating new PebbleOS watchfaces or apps.

[–] Mexigore@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Only thing missing is NFC. If it had it I would get it in a heart beat

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spamspeicher@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

IDon'tNeedAPebbleIDon'tNeedAPebbleIDon'tNeedAPebbleIDon'tNeedAPebbleIDon'tNeedAPebbleIDon'tNeedAPebble

Aaand preordered. The Pebble Steel was one of the best smartwatches I've ever had. I loved that thing and I'm still pissed that I sold the steel a few years ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How does this compare to pine64? I want a privacy focused watch if at all possible

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

I have a PineTime running through Gadgetbridge, and a Pebble Time Steel with Rebble services. You can pair the Pebble with Gadgetbridge and run it that way, and I imagine these new Core watches would operate similarly... But we will find out as time goes on.

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm with you on this. If it could come with a privacy-respecting smartphone app hosted on F-Droid, that would be so great.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I was thinking of getting this but the focus is mainly for fitness. I think a garmin would be better for my purpose though because I honestly don't know what I would do with this watch

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kane@femboys.biz 6 points 2 weeks ago

This is a blast from the past

[–] lipilee@feddit.nl 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

as much as I loved the original Pebbles (and love the design of these too), I think basically the world has moved on... for this kind of money, I am buying a Garmin watch with GPS, HR, etc. but I hope there will be a group of enthusiasts and wish all the luck to the company with sales. more options are always better :)

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I haven't moved on. Pebble Time Steel was the best watch I've ever had. I've been using Fitbit since the death of Pebble and they never got as good as Pebble was. If Repebble hadn't shown up, I'd probably be going Garmin after the inevitable death of Fitbit. But now that the choice is between Garmin and a hackable open source Pebble with 30 days of battery life... Repebble wins for me. ☺️

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

No moving on here. I still wear a OG Pebble daily, and I'm super excited about this. I just wish they hadn't chosen 'Core 2 Duo' like it hadn't been the name of another product...

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I just pre-ordered one, but the price made me wince 😬

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί