this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
259 points (98.5% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

4198 readers
9 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Lmao ok ill just follow best practices and end up inadvertently writing an orm from scrach then πŸ™†β€β™€οΈ

[–] Plumbob@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago

Hating on Lombok and setters simultaneously seems contradictory.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ideal situation: single guy working from home, no pets. Neighbors describe him as "pretty quiet" or "I dunno."

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Extroverts cannot comprehend introverts.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wow, the only one I agree with here is MongoDB (and probably Lombok, I don't write Java), and that has more to do with their licensing issues than anything technical.

That's pretty impressive.

Here's my list:

  • no-go list of languages - Java, PHP, Ruby, C++ (unless you absolutely need C++ for some domain)
  • OOP - OOP should be isolated, not forced on every problem; many OOP advocates are dogmatic about injecting it everywhere
  • waterfall - screw that noise, faster to market + faster feedback is generally better

That's really it, and I'm totally willing to mentor someone who likes the above if they're otherwise a good developer.

[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If you had to write Java you probably would like Lombok if you dislike boilerplate (it can build object constructors, comparators, and field accessor methods via annotation).

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Java is boilerplate though. It's finally getting almost tolerable with static imports, arrow functions/lambdas (whatever Java calls it), etc.

If I had to write Java, I'd push for Kotlin instead, after failing to convince management that there are much better options for the problem they need to solve.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 days ago

You can say you’re running Java and write components in Kotlin or Scala, no one knows after the module is published!

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 127 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Software craftsman

Fart sniffer detected

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Am I wrong or does that title he's given himself directly contradict his dislike of code ownership? Or is it just he assumes he deserves credit for the code written by any of his subordinates?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkWinterNights@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Lol. Let’s ban accountability, refactoring, and debugging, never work alone, never coordinate, avoid productivity, and refuse ownershipβ€”then scream when things break, don’t integrate, and fall behind schedule.

"This is all your fault!" built-in. Why didn't you intuitively know what myX is supposed to do and how it's used?

Provocation just for "engagement" really. 102 comments so, to some degree, it works.

E: Guys, it's satire. Lol.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This might be my type of job. I ssh into a server and build the backend using bash scripting in nano. HTML and CSS is also done using nano on the live server. No SCRUM needed. We have a large group of testers we refer to as "customers", and they pay for the privilege.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Real devs write each http response by hand. If you use a server you're a filthy casual soydev

[–] tomcatt360@lemmy.zip 59 points 1 week ago

That's great! I wouldn't want to work for him anyway.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Code Ownership

Lol did someone try and make him maintain the shitty code he wrote

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just build whatever you want on prod and disappear after the deadline so they can never ask you to update your code

[–] kubica@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

Sorry the developer you are calling is out of scope.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are two types of software engineers: those who are anxious and those who are narcissistic and grandiose. This guy is easy to place in the latter category.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago

Whatever this guy supposedly architects, it ain't software.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (14 children)
  • ORM's
  1. Place ALL of the business logic in stored procedures.
  2. Eliminate the backend.
  3. Make the front end connect directly to the database.
  4. ~~Profit~~
  5. Introduce tons of bugs and terrible performance.
  6. Database is compromised within five minutes of going live.
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

When you don't have a downvote button, all you get is an echo chamber

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Golang outside of infrastructure

What does that even mean?

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Golang is petty slow with a GUI I've found, a web UI works well but GTK or something like that is slow. Maybe that's what he means?

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He wants all his infrastructure to be pure golang.

[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I read it to mean that he believes Golang should only be used for infrastructure and nothing else.

This is an assumption based on a structure of: if you [insert dot point] then we ain't cool.

Allthough I only rarely exclude anyone from anything for any reason, I suppose one addition I would make to a list of mental farts I use to elevate myself, would be: people who communicate their ideas like a PowerPoint and expect to convey real meaning.

What I find crazy about X, is that even though it's owned by Musk, a lot of Americans are quietly and conveniently ignoring it. People are losing their shit over Tesla and then posting about it on X.

I watched a YouTube video the other day where the presenter, who is a full time politically left content creator, was sharing his screen and discussing a Bernie Sanders X post, from within his own X account. It's crazy.

Why anyone is still on that burning pile of trash, I will never understand. I mean, if you want to say anything longer than 280 characters long, you have to pay a premium. This is the opposite of 'free' speach.

Peace!

load more comments (2 replies)

In an effort to make the post full of engagement bait, the dude ironically made it less engaging.

Remove every bullet point except Lombok, and you got yourself a proper flame war.

[–] thebeardedpotato@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This feels like a facetious post because what. There’s no way he’s serious

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

NGL I was on board at the first line. He lost me quickly after though

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί