There will be violence in Ukraine regardless of whether weapons are sent there or not. The second option will make it so there's noone to police the russians. Pretty much like palestinians can't do much about israelis slaughtering them.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

NATO had buit the largest of any European armies there and they were slaughtering the ethnic Russians, nobody was crying about policing them were they?

[–] Soolonkivi@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't know what you're talking about.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I know, that's the problem isn't it?

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] Soolonkivi@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So what you meant to say is: "I think

NATO had buit the largest of any European armies there and they were slaughtering the ethnic Russians, nobody was crying about policing them were they?

But I have no sources other than my thoughts to support this view."

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Ugh, the crying about NATO armies. "They were about to get too strong to attack, so Russia had to attack before they got completely too strong to attack." Yeah, okay vlad

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] tory@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Israel has controlled the USG for decades now. We support Israel because they have been intricately and impressively spying on us since at least the 1980s and bought and paid for most of our politicians. It's just that simple, they own our politicians, and therefore: when they do heinous evil, our politicians look away.

Ukraine was invaded by our largest rival on the world stage as a power grab, and NATO decided to help.

The two situations are not comparable in the slightest.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments