this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
175 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

69844 readers
3593 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] doug@lemmy.today 98 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Cool, another app I won’t download and will look sideways at whoever does.

If I see its userbase consists of gen z and younger I will be very disappointed.

[–] yoshisaur@lemm.ee 72 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm sorry but you're 100% going to be disappointed

[–] doug@lemmy.today 31 points 1 month ago

You’re right, I should set my expectations now.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

If I find out Lemmy.world has a mouse favicon I'm going to be disappointed

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago

He is really so dumb

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Wasn't the whole thing about China scooping up loads of data?

So give a copy of that data to one of the worlds largest advertiser/online markets and license behavioural data from the "baddies". Yeah, that'll fix everything.

Everybody loses.

[–] small44@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wasn't the whole thing about China scooping up loads of data?

No

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They've admitted it was about gaza

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Womble@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I wouldnt trust the words of a Palantir exec if they said the sky was blue, but even accepting what they say, its just that the hamas attacks gave the ban impetus to move forwards. By his own words the ban already had bipartesan support and executive approval before that.

The headline that it was "about" Isreal rather than China is a massive reach.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

If not user data and network security concerns, what? Why the ban/sale song and dance?

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 month ago

People were opposing the Gaza genocide which is a joint American isreali project

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Also money, which are just political points in tangible/fungible format

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's about content delivery, i.e. the CCP having direct control over what content (i.e. propaganda) is sent to Americans on the platform via their proprietary algorithm (with all the source code heavily guarded in mainland China).

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Controlling people's media experience to push political propaganda that helps powerful people and harms individuals - that seems really shitty.

I can't think of any app developer or political party who would do that.

(This is an attempt at surrealist humor.)

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 2 points 1 month ago

Both can be bad.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Control over what messages can be removed?

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

It was about the weaponization of the algorithm whereby China could incite Americans to act against the nation in a time of crisis or war.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

TikTok’s valuation remains contested, with estimates varying from US$20 billion ($31.8 billion) to more than US$300 billion, depending on whether its algorithm is factored in.

The algorithm increases the price by more than $280 billion. And what kind of algorithm? One that changes its high based on how you interact with it, to always try and get your dopamine flowing to keep you interacting longer. If it were a real substance, it would be the most addictive drug to ever exist.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wtf, do proprietary algorithms actually cost this much?

[–] Pirata@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

I mean, have you seen how effective Tik Toks one is?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You could argue if xai paid xitter 45 billion in their latest ~~money laundering operation~~ acquisition, then TikTok is worth at least ten xitters

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 28 points 1 month ago

Surely US investors won't harvest data and/or enshittify the product!

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why the fuck does this dude care so much about one social media platform being available here? Is he perving on dancing teenagers?

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because it's been an incredibly successful propoganda vector for the youth vote.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Huh. Is that good or bad?

I don’t pay attention to TikTok. I’m not on there.

[–] Brandonazz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Very obviously bad. You want educated voters, not propagandized ones.

[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Bad, it's why so many of them are magattes.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

tiktok is used by genz and alpha alot, it helps that they would be the next generation of a dying GOP voters which are primarily boomers, Xers, and some milleneals.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

I believe it is part of a strategy known as indoctrination

[–] El_Azulito@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Oh thank God, I thought the economy was about to collapse or something.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't fumble this loops. Now is the moment.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Loops...kind of sucks. I get the point of it, but I tried using it like 15 minutes a day for a couple weeks to get used to it, but the features are lacking and the content is...well it's filled with people who would abandon tiktok and other apps, so, it's kind of boring.

Not in a 'there's no brainrot' way, in a 'this is the third video in a row of just random AI slop and then it's just some dude filming a tree for 20 seconds'.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Bootstrapping is definitely going to be an issue. There was news they are supposed to have federation working and released tomorrow. Right now there's not even a client in the play store so I haven't bothered with it.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

People bitch about the algorithm but it's actually pretty nice having things you're more likely to enjoy come to you than having to try and hunt them down with nothing but a very poor search function.

I want it to recommend me shit I would probably enjoy; I just don't want it to recommend me shit in an attempt to brainwash me with their agenda. Barring that, get a better search function. Utilize tags and categories. Allow users to tag others' videos because you can't expect the uploader to think of every possible connection it could have.

I want to like Loops, but it's 90% random nature shots that don't need to be videos and finding anything else is a PITA.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

so basically taxpayers will be paying china for an app that only 2% of the country uses

[–] MagicalAbyss@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Honestly, I don't who would be the better owner of Tik Tok at this point..

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago