this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)

BrainWorms

1494 readers
67 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alykanas@slrpnk.net 12 points 23 hours ago

Everyone would be happier

You would need to make illegal both advertising and the associated spyware and data collection infrastructure.

[–] Stache_@lemmy.ml 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

It sounds like a good idea, but I’m not sure how efficiently it could be enforced. If a photo of someone wearing a certain brand of clothes is in a news article, does that count as advertising for that clothing brand? What if the news article goes viral?

[–] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago

I'm mainly concerned with paid for, intentional advertising, but yes, if there's an obvious brand logo in a news article's image, then it should be censored in some way, even if it's just blurred out.

[–] Sinaf@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

I'd also think it would be better to create rules and regulations that are as clear cut as possible and almost impossible to circumvent.

Go after billboards first. I can turn off the TV and avoid websites that have too many ads. I should be able to ignore advertisements in the public space. Clear size limits, don't allow structures that will only be used for this specific purpose, etc.