How long has palworld been out? getting a patentnow shouldn't mean dick about palworld.
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
137 points (97.9% liked)
PC Gaming
10692 readers
364 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
urge to buy switch 2... fading...
Nintendo is the worst fucking company, and yet all I hear is "I can't wait to get that Switch 2". The general public doesn't know fuck all about anything in the world.
No one cares about the problems of the world as long as they can get their dopamine dose
Nintendo and their lawyers can go suck an elephant dick.
From part 8 of the newest doc
the boarding character is selected among a plurality of characters the player character owns in association with providing a second operation input when the player character is in the air, cause the player character to board an air boarding character and bringing the character into a state where the player character can move in the air
and while the player is aboard the air boarding character, move the player character, aboard the air boarding character, in the air based on a third operation input
Plurality of mounts and "second operation when in the air" ain't new, World of Warcraft had that in 2007 with Burning Crusade. I have no clue what "third operation input" means there.
A lot of the other alterations seem to focus on "air boarding character", probably because they realized that you can only change your mount in Palworld manually while on ground or water, which kept glider pals safe, as they were the only ones you could summon while in the air.
Receiving a patent after another company already made a product that would infringe that patent?
That sure sounds very legal :^)
The patent application that led to the ‘255 patent was filed in September 2022, more than a year before Palworld’s launch. But Nintendo made amendments to the claims throughout the process, also after Palworld had been launched. Finally, the patent issued this year.
I guess, this is what makes it complicated..
Said that, in my opinion, game design patents are BS, as it it hinders free creativity a lot
Almost all patents are BS. At least for how they currently work. Anything longer than a few years is just selfish capitalism.
Y E S ! ! !
That's funny because I'm betting the EU will just invalidate all the us parents as a retaliation to tarrifs
So, if you have enough money, you can just fire off a shitload of ex-post-facto patents after a competitor releases a prior-art product, sue them, and win using patents that didn't exist when the competitor's product was created????
Might as well just close the whole patent system and leave, there's quite literally no point to obeying it if you can so blatantly steal anything and everything.
There's no point? There is a point: To protect the rich and powerful. The patent system is serving its purpose here as intended by the people who have been making these rules.
That is not the official goal of the patent system in any country, and any behavior like that should be stopped.
You think the string-pullers would be honest about their goals? It's all about control, making sure the haves keep.
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
As great a philosophical mainstay as Hanlon's razor is, I find it pretty difficult to believe a system of laws that almost exclusively favour the wealthy, especially when it's people in positions of wealth that write said laws, is some happy accident.
I'm not saying otherwise, I just have some serious doubts that there are some men in black in some dark room pulling the strings.
They're definitely in an ivory tower at the least.
The stated purpose of the police is not "protect the rich from the poor".
The stated purpose of war is not "to extract resources from that country and fund the industrial war machine".
Many things are made for serving a purpose that's not said out loud.
It's about proving who was the original creator/user of the IP, instead of who is the first to file to have that IP protected.
The flipside of this would be having random holding companies just mass filing for ownership of everything posted online, said, written-down, or created, in the hopes that they get approved first so they can sue others, even the creators, for using it.
Look at the "very demure, very mindful" woman, Jools Lebron. Someone else (Jefferson Bates) file to trademark the saying because the original creator didn't think to until after it was viral. Because the laws are ultimately about proving who was the creator, and not who filed first in the USA, it's likely that Jools will get ownership, eventually.
One of the gates to getting a patent approved is proving that you are attempting to patent it in a timely manner. You're supposed to file a patent within one year of first public disclosure to prove that you're actively protecting your IP and plan to develop it, and if you don't it's grounds for denial.
Palworld alone has been out over a year now, let alone how long most of the Pokemon stuff Nintendo has been patenting. Nintendo has zero grounds for applying these patents, and the fact that they are able to obtain them just because they have more lawyer money means the patent system is completely pointless and laws don't matter.
They're called patent trolls and our busted system already has them
That's how it should work, yes, if Nintendo can demonstrate prior art. That's the first-to-invent system.
The US did change to first-to-file some years ago, but from the articles like this coming out, it sounds like they're still granting patents to the first inventor.
What's the point of trying to be legal if this is legal? It completely destroys any semblance of competition.
Thanks for reminding me to not buy the switch 2
This is like the Streisand effect for making me want to pirate their content out of spite
I've just pirated all of their games for their not most recent console. Feels good man.
God, I wouldn't even play the newer Pokémon games if I pirated them. Imagine being sued because somone thought you copied "Z-A", or whatever dumbass name the newest Pokémon game has. "Your honor, in my defense, my game isn't steaming hot shit, therefore I couldn't have copied Nintendo."
Unfortunately nintendo lawyers are already on their way to send a cease and desist to OP for using their name in a lemmy post :(
Hypothetically, If I were working at pocket pair, I'd put 2M in crypto on the side to support a team of devs to hack the switch two and enable piracy from year one. Fight fire with fire.
Hacking the Switch 2 becomes a moral obligation at this point.
Apparently not, seeing how badly I got ratiod. Nintendo fans sure are something...
Might be the mention of crypto. A lot of people are quite sore from the crypto based stock market scams that are still going on today.
The entire crypto world has been hijacked by drug dealers, pedos and would be dictators. If they ratioed me because of that, then I wholeheartedly deserve the flack. We need an alternative non speculative private payment method.
hijacked by drug dealers
No, the drug dealers were there first. The entire crypto world has been hijacked by speculation and scams
Fair enough, silk road was pretty wild.
You don't have to, switch 2 will be hacked next day by mario and zelda fanboys.
There's going to be no emulators look what Nintendo has done to switch one emulators. They are not going to allow switch 2 emulators to gain traction.
Don't underestimate the power of the whole world against small japanese company. If they won't be able to hack it without accessing hardware spec they will hack Nintendo servers and get all the hardware spec. World will always find the way to fuck corporation that closes it's software / hardware.
We still don't have software-only exploit for switch 1 , even then only certain serial numbers hackable
I thought you could software-only hack the very first Switchs?
No, on those older versions you have to short two pins of the right joycon slot to enter a factory mode, where you can then push a payload from another device, usually a PC. Restarting the console undoes the unlock, so you have to push the payload again
Be prepared to grab your pitchforks and torches! We storm against Goliath as dawn!
All jokes aside, would absolutely love it if a bunch of Sintendo "fans" all stormed the courtroom in support of them to give them to hopefully lower their brand reputation. Not just this potential case, but literally every single time they go to court anywhere.