this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
530 points (92.7% liked)

Political Memes

7852 readers
4183 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Even if we had commie blocks in the US, believing they would ever be affordable is pure fantasy. The corpofascists would just collude with each other and price fix things so that they'd cost the $3k/month that current lowest-tier shithole apartments cost and then everything else would get a major price hike.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I mean the US has much less soulless housing, and we have enough housing for everyone. The issue is we have a society that doesn't care to house the homeless.

The issues with the brutalist blocs built in Eastern Europe is usually more about the soulessness and drearineess of the architecture.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

People on the streets is far more soulless than gray concrete housing. Especially because concrete can at least be painted over to make it look better.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I think you misunderstood my point. That concrete block design came about due to a push for efficency and quickly rebuilding post WWII. So it was either house more people quickly or nice looking houses.

The US hasn't really ever had to make that decision. We have enough houses as is for the homeless. The design of our homes/apartment buildings is not our limiting factor, it's our policies and approach to housing and the homeless.

[–] knemesis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

But look how colorful the tents are!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I mean, the people shitting on "commie blocks" usually don't mind that homeless people are barely considered human by the law... so they'd probably be on board with the idea of sending the police to slash all these tents

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The commie blocks also had smart city planning, like you had a supermarket and everything else in walking range, and no through traffic. I do think they could be designed and build a bit nicer with modern technology. Especially higher ceilings and thicker walls. And then put those blocks out into nature or agricultural land and connect them via high speed rail or a self driving shuttle bus.

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No city folks want to live in agri land due to smell and sounds from agri works. I do agree with more green areas. Stockholm gets a lot of flak for its miljonprojekt but there are quite a lot of trees and green areas within walking distance from most places

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I suspect most city folk live in the city to find work. So if more people could work online, or wouldn't have to work at all (less consumerism, wealth redistribution, basic income) then I suspect most would want to live close to nature but still luxuriously. So the ideal I can imagine would be a luxury apartment block surrounded by fields and forest (now pig manure though since we need to stop industrial meat production anyway)

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago

Affordable housing doesnt need to be expensive. You can have pretty nice midrises for very cheap. Design like 20 different models, all of em in 5 different colours, thats 100 different styles of apartment buildings and you just dont put two of the same next to eachother and problem solved. Mass produced, colourful, nice, cheap, housing.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 78 points 4 days ago (16 children)

As someone from a post-soviet country, and had to live in one of those.. there's plenty of reasons to shit on them.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

Indeed. There is a hierarchy.

Commie blocks are better than tents.

But proper social housing is better than commie blocks.

And proper social housing mixed with middle class owner-occupied housing in the same neighborhoods and even within the same buildings is the best.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

Ok im gonna try typing out some of the observations of living in commie blocks from personal experience as well as some stories from my friends. Im also spoilering it for anyone who doesn't want to read the list.. also also.. not a comprehensive list of everything, just what I can think of on my lunch break

here goes

  • The first thing to point out in my opinion is the construction: The construction of these were often rushed so at best they require expensive renovations and at worst they collapse, see tofu dreg in china
  • Safety: This is something I remember from my safety classes back in school. We had to make a fire escape plan for our houses, with at least 2 exits.. which I really struggled with cause I lived on a high floor, so no jumpimg out the window, and no fire escapes only meant I could do 1. So the commie apartments don't meet our modern safety standards
  • Location: A lot of this down to the economic collapse of various commusist countries, but many of them are quite literally in a middle of nowhere, in terms of finding a job. This is something I struggled with a lot, cause any job I could find would require a car to commute
  • Parking space: The commie blocks were often designed with green space in mind which would be nice, if they weren't also not designed with the idea of every household having a car, so when you have 16 parking spaces and the rest of the 40 cars in the mud that was once grass they start to look a lot more depressing
  • Accesability: The majority of commie blocks had no elevators, with the exception of quite tall ones. And even then the elevator usually started at the first floor rather than ground floor. This means if you're disabled and the only available social housing is commie blocks.. tough shit cause you're not getting in. I know someone who's a single mother with a disabled adult daughter who's she the primary caretaker off. She would have to carry her daugher up and down a flight of stairs everyday, and then also drag the electric wheelchair up
  • Renovations: Pretty simple - the apartments are usually owned by individuals, rather than a housing company, and getting all 60 or so people to agree to renovate the outside of the building is imposible, with both poorer people and older people stubborn to change, as well as alcoholics and the like
  • Utilities/equipment: Many of the commie blocks in my area didn't have city gas, that means for cooking anything you either had to have an electric stove, or more commonly from what I've seen buy big gas tanks and lug them up to your floor. They also lacked extractor fans, so I hope you like greasy walls
  • Insulation: Have you seen soviet wall carpets? It's cause even with the windows closed you could feel the breeze through the walls. The winters there meant multiple jackets indoors, and the summers were unbearably hot too
  • Insulation pt 2: With high humidity it also meant mold. Fun right?
  • Insulation pt 3: No noise insulation either. At least meant the cops got called a lot for all the spousal abuse

Just to name a few :3.. im gonna go eat now

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hey there, also lived in commie block (ground floor of the 10 level (+ground) one), wanna add few things!

  1. Ants and cockroaches. Always found they way in, even on higher levels! And once they are in, done, they ain't going out.
  2. Outside look. Dunno how yours looked, but mine were all gray with corrugated steel at sides and a few stripes top-bottom of paint that was of unsaturated yellow, red or blue.
  3. But also good sides. We had pre-school, primary and middle school pretty much encircled with our commie blocks (lucky to be in town). Also a trading centre with bunch of small shops, one market, few services and post office. And a lot of small local shops.
  4. A lot of green and playgrounds. ^^
  5. Spoopy windows. I believe I lived with the original windows, when it was windy, they tried to be spoopy (oooooOoooOooooo). Good luck sleepin during thunderstorm.

Also, bonus point for specifically my neighbourhood - it was built on cementary. We had a lot of weird phenomena, I learnt where it was built much later after moving out.

Now, miracle happened as they renovated these! Got proper insulation and paint, and they look nice now. They also moved down some green space outside the circle and made more parking, leaving inner greenery intact.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My small addition to the list is that the surrounding green spaces were usually poorly lit and created lots of opportunities for muggers to hide once it got dark. In winters it gets dark early, so winters were a dangerous time.

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh, yeah. A lot of bushes also, the tall ones in which you could overall easily hide. Where I lived, these green spaces were also different heights. Now it was somewhat safe where I was (in a "nobody shits in their own nest" way) but I've seen a few folk who upset more difficult people and...yeah. Pretty much nowhere to go safely.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Yep. Despite large buildings, overall density ends up pretty small so you often don't meet a lot of people when on a walk, which increases feelings of danger.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The ants one is real x3.. they were all over the place even on the 4th floor. No cockroaches where I lived but a ton of wasps.. I think the wasps were nesting in the walls

And the whistling windows too hah

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

We used to have those tiny Egyptian ones, but the heating system was replaced from a nearby industrial one to the central one and they all left because it became too cold for them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Look, the post clearly states "No real reason". You, you gotta learn to read.

(I lived in one of these and it was absolute hell)

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

People shitting on commie blocks, but there's millions who would love to have a roof and plumbing.

The more densely we live, the more land that can be left wild/rewilded. We're not entitled to a tick tacky vinyl wrapped house surrounded by lawns and pavement. Our earth is fucked and getting more so by the day. It's a problem that can only be solved by us all living smaller lives.

I always tell people to look to Hong Kong for housing practices. They don't do everything right, but they're definitely on the right track.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I demand my own little box on a hillside!

[–] kaprap@leminal.space 4 points 3 days ago

Support state owned apartments!

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 40 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Well, this picture is just poor city development. Living in appartement buildings 3-5-7-9 floors high is all very fine, IF

  • The neighbourhood is (pedestrian) permeable enough. The space around it must be pedestrian/cycle friendly and green. The blocks in this picture are way to wide, forming too big barriers for local slow traffic
  • there is a bit of variation in colour, size, shape. A neighbourhood with such blocks can surely have 4 identical buildings, but not 30... It feels uneasy to humans this way. We need a taller or oddly shaped or nicely coloured one once in a while, as a reference point, as things that give the neighbourhood a bit of an identity
  • The buildings themselves are high enough quality (well insulated, every appartement has 1 or 2 real balconies, ...)
  • there are plenty of playgrounds and sports facilities and cars are in general carparks in garages at the edge of the neighbourhood, not on the streets
  • neighbourhood is well connected to the rest of the city
  • there are plenty of jobs in the area. Probably the hardest part.
[–] GTG3000@programming.dev 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

May I introduce you to the concept of microdistrict. That's how the original soviet developments were planned out - every house is guaranteed to have necessities like stores, a polyclinic, a school, a kindergarden, or a fire department within reasonable distance. Usually, walking distance. Everything is pedestrian permeable, there's public transport connecting the "sleeping districts" where there were mostly apartments to the industrial areas where the jobs were. And yeah, playgrounds in or near every building.

Jobs in the same area as apartments isn't really happening though, office buildings and industry tends to be away.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] albert180@piefed.social 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not rocket science. Vienna did this once. Also you don't need car parks if a city is well designed. Public Transport and Carsharing is enough

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alterlaa

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago

The original commieblocks were fairly walkable, with parks, schools, grocery stores, and so on nearby. I'm personally a fan of making all the buildings concrete blocks and then getting a bunch of local mural artists to paint them for visual distinction.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kruddman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

This is not an equivalent argument. We can build spaces for humans that don't suck the soul out of you. I've lived in crummy apartments horded by neighbors, and as long as I have the choice I never will again.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The projects were a flawed concept not least because it concentrates inequality leading to the obvious results.

So instead we have a morass of inscrutable regulations on 3-4 levels (federal, state, county, city) with wildly complex funding schemes making the few expert developers wildly wealthy while building tragically few affordable units.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not just the concentration of inequality. Also there was often no infrastructure, no shops, no pubs, no nothing, super thin walls, so you could hear all your neighbours, terrible heat isolation... not so different from the tents but higher concentration of people, which made it worse. In many post-communist countries those were later remade into livable places, but it took lots of time and money to do so. Totalitarian regimes suck.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Oh there is a reason

These commies blocks don't just look ugly, they tend to become a crime riddled dump

Then again, you can also build affordable housing that doesn't look like a prison system?

All the Projects in major cities are an example. But it isn’t the buildings’ fault. It just putting a lot of poor people with lots of problems all in one place tends to concentrate all the ills that go along with poverty.

[–] j5906@feddit.org 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They are very common in Germany and are in general really safe, the only crime going on there was smoking pot (which is not a crime anymore). I myself did not grow up in one, but many friends have and I still frequently visit people there. Floors, stairs and elevators are clean, neighbours greet you, when someone new moves in its common to help them as a neighbour.

Recently one of these houses was in the news "weißer Riese" in Duisburg because of crime. Now Duisburg is basically Germanys Detroit, used to be a coal mining city and has nothing else going on for it (still the homicide rate for Duisburg is 20x lower than for Detroit lol). And this house is 55years old and has been neglected by the developers, so rent for an apartment there is basically the lowest of any German city and in Germanys most undesirable city and somehow people wonder why there is some crime and this becomes the stereotype for all "commie blocks".

But for every commie block like that you get 1000 others that are really safe and clean, offer cheap rent, are energy efficient as fuck, some even have their own bus or train stations, big playground in the middle and usually more on the edge of the city so closer to nature.

This stereotype thing about commie blocks always reminds me of the american homeless people sleeping in tents in front of the "victims of communism" museum...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

These commies blocks don't just look ugly, they tend to become a crime riddled dump

It will surprise you, but this is other way around. Hruschevkas have less crime than modern humant colonies.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

The alternative, tent cities like skid row, are pretty crime-heavy. I've never heard about commie blocks being especially crime ridden, but I guess you have good reason to say what you did and aren't just pulling it straight out your ass.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

all I see are 2 examples of brutalism

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

Nah. Both are brutal, but only one is brutalist.

load more comments
view more: next ›