Why doesnβt she write a book about whatever unimaginable horrific childhood trauma turned her into such a vile adult?
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
180 points (88.5% liked)
World News
35601 readers
977 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
lol says the person who hid behind initials because having her real name on cover would hurt her sales due to sexism.
Her? Appropriating a gender? Wow never ever /s
What a fraud
She wrote a whole series about how bigotry is bad but in retrospect, it feels like she didn't really understand why bigotry is bad. She just needed her children's books to have a moral message and she made a very surface level parallel to the holocaust. Then years later, she showed her ignorance about the holocaust by denying that transgender people were a target.
Her main protagonist is a rich jock who grows up to be a cop. What did you expect?
Probably the most problematic thing in the Harry Potter books is the pro-slavery propaganda with the house elves, which the filmmakers wisely omitted
The reason is simple: she's a bigot. She has been successful at pushing her transphobic agenda into UK law, and she will continue to move across the spectrum because hate only knows how to hate even when they succeed.
This is exactly the reason I'm shifting from just warning people that buying her shit is immoral so outright calling them bigots for supporting bigotry. If they don't want to be bigots they can stop giving her their goddamn money.
I support and share most of your opinions. She is a huge bigot and should be accountable for her actions. My only point is that we have kids and teenagers still consuming her books and products that are completely unaware of what is happening and shouldn't be called out because of that.
While I don't disagree I think it's important to keep in mind that kids and teenagers aren't stupid - they are capable of understanding that you shouldn't allow a bad person to continue to be a bad person if you have a conversation about why what JKR is doing is bad. Most of the vocal pushback that I've experienced offline has actually come from teenagers.
The problem lies squarely with millennial parents who continue to buy books/movies/games/merch for themselves or their young children because of nostalgia. They are old enough to know better, and should be held responsible for their actions.
load more comments
(6 replies)
Getting too much money reaaaaally fucks with your head. Becoming a billionaire should count as a brain injury.
Eh. It's more that you hear a lot about the nuts ones. Number 5 on the richest list is currently a guy named Bernard Arnault, who mostly French people know about, while the infamous Peter Thiel is at 129.
Same story here. Rowling may or may not have a full billion, but she's famous and good at getting rage views like this one.
Harry Potter creator goes on rant about asexuals for some reason π€·π½ββοΈ
Because she is a homophobic piece of shit.
Sounds like Voldermor was inspired by her own persona
More the Dursleys IMO. She hates the people who don't conform to her view of normality.
Homophobic? I thought she was just anti-trans.
Either way, I'm very curious how the LGBT community views a wholly trans-phobic shit stain that simultaneously claims to support the gay community. I know just such a person and would like some insight from the community itself.
The term is TERF.
Homophobic? I thought she was just anti-trans.
Will she sure is not an ally, or even neutral.
In the HP fanfiction community many/most despise her.
Youβd think this dumb cunt could just fuck off and enjoy her fortune, but no
This is literally fun to these people. Foaming at the mouth gives them energy, it's all they can run on anymore. Vapid angst.
I'll steelman her POV because it seems people are (rightly) confused.
Asexuals are requesting a day of recognition for what she sees as a negative-identity. Keep in mind, conservatives are often meritocratic.
It's like if there were a day for "coffee refrainers", for everyone who doesn't like drinking coffee. I'm sure if someone dunked on that day and the coffee refrainers, it'd all be in good spirits.
But if someone dunked on asexuality, I'm sure it'd cause a lot of upset and defensive argument, which implies more "merit" to asexuality.
While progressives can go "who cares, just leave em be", conservatives see all "non-deserved" attention as an affront to meritocracy, that needs to be squashed.
This actually really helps me understand her perspective. I think she's wrong of course, and even harmful, but I appreciate the steelman.
How the actual fuck could asexuals offend you? smdh
It does make me wonder if JK is actually asexual herself, and feels shame about it. Like how men who claim that "being gay is a choice" often feel that way because they consciously forced themselves to be straight despite their attraction to other men.
There are very few people that can turn my stomach up like this bitch.
What a hateful idiot lol that's all I can say
So transphobia wasn't enough to satisfy her bigoted brain, now she's going for asexual people as well. Pathetic.
I mean she has to be a troll at this point for attacking asexual people right? J.K. Trolling
Like, it's just people who don't like sex, I don't understand the hate? And I'm about as far from asexual as you can get.
She hates asexual people for the same reason she hates transgender people, they're not conforming to her view of normality.
There are a strange amount of people who seem to hate the idea of asexuality and this unfortunately includes people from all swaths of life like the LGBTQ+ community. I've seen too many gay people say hurtful, and frankly hypocritical, things along the lines of asexuality not existing and being more akin to a disease. It seems that while more people have become aware and accepting of homosexuality, they still don't understand asexuality and it scares them. Sad really. But luckily there are still lots of kind souls out there that will be accepting of anyone who's accepting in return. Maybe they can show everyone else the way...
Honestly I don't understand it. Most likely don't. But it's also it's none of my business what consenting adults choose not to do.
Really the arguments are no different to any sexual interest. As long as the people are happy and consenting adults. I do not need to understand.
Yeah, I've seen it from hypersexual people who seem to have unprocessed shame and need to believe their own behaviour is justified by being a universal human trait. The existence of asexuality threatens that.
Irony is that the entire Harry Potter series is like discriminating against people for who they are is wrong.
To be fair, I'm pretty sure the slave race of house elves continue being slaves because "they love being slaves".
Didn't Hermione lead a campaign to liberate house elves but was laughed at by everyone until she dropped it?
Then Harry frees one elf and is considered a hero while the person trying to solve the systemic problems is a whiny bitch. She's showing how she thinks about the world with that one.
What the hell does the bottom post even mean? Is she saying she prefers segregated bathrooms? I knew she is a TERF but she's apparently also racist?
For a professional writer you'd think she would know that a quotation (even a fictional one) requires quotation marks around it to make it clear to the reader that it's not what you are saying but somebody else. Perhaps this makes more sense:
"Refusing to accept that people who don't like sex belong in the gay category is akin to wanting segregated bathrooms in the 1950s, John," as approximately a thousand gender activists will inform you once their hands stop literally shaking.
She's mocking the people who replied to her.
Wow she really isnβt very good.
How were we so starved for something that we latched onto her baloney?
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Average JKR disaster of an opinion
I'm ace and JK can go fuck herself
Well youβre not going to do it, what choice does she have?
Did she get snubbed by someone who's ace or something? Asexuality is possibly the most inoffensive sexuality in existence.
Like, oh no.
They don't experience sexual attraction.
That means they're probably significantly less likely to objectify or assault you than someone who isn't ace. Isn't that a good thing for someone supposedly so concerned with being objectified and violated, Miss Rowling?
What a wildly brain-dead take from someone who loves claiming to be a feminist.
(Yes, I know she's not actually a feminist, but it's another piece of hypocrisy to throw on the pile)
She's pathetic.
I can't wait for her to die. It's why I as a trans person keep living.
Bigot says bigot things
view more: next βΊ