this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
849 points (99.0% liked)

Funny

9460 readers
1506 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 77 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Shit like this makes me realise why people become mathematicians. You just play around with numbers and find funny facts about them.

[–] driving_crooner 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So, years ago in college in Linear Algebra our professor said to us to study about idempotent matrices. So I checked out that wiki page and saw the example for 2x2 matrix, that are composed by the numbers 3, -6, 1 and -2. And I was like wait a second, 3×-2=-6 there's no way they are not relationship there, so I started trying other numbers, and found and proved (using induction) that any n, -n(n-1), 1, -(n-1) is an idempotent matrix. At the test there were no questions about that, and I was short of 0.5 poits to pass the class without having to present a final exam and I told my professor that I spent a lot of time learning that and that even discovered something and proved he pass me the chart and asked me to proved it, after that he gave the missing points. Was really good.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You need to put the name inside the brackets and the link inside the parentheses.

idempotent matrices

[–] driving_crooner 3 points 1 week ago
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I myself once learned 380 digits of π, when I was a crazy high-school kid. My never-attained ambition was to reach the spot, 762 digits out in the decimal expansion, where it goes "999999", so that I could recite it out loud, come to those six 9s, and then impishly say, "and so on!"

—Douglas Hofstadter

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That would be an amazing party trick.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Actually come to think of it, even more amazing in the age of smart phones, when it's possible to easily verify to numbers you're reciting.

load more comments (5 replies)

Then you try to figure out why they do be like that

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 46 points 1 week ago (5 children)

gonna need this in every base

I'll start with base 2:

1/1 = 1

[–] mattd@programming.dev 16 points 1 week ago

Base 3:

21 / 12 = 1.1012101210121012

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

gonna need this in every base

...all of them?

[–] match@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

for great justice

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

I'm gonna need a formal proof for this.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

We should be friends

[–] NosferatuZodd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] NosferatuZodd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Who are You, Who are so Wise in the Ways of Science?

[–] rainrain@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just noticed what the numbers are. It really is easy to memorize. So convenient.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

987654312÷123456789

Change the 21 at the end of the first number to 12 and its perfect. It was only ever 9 away.

[–] shekau@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Witch! Begone foul demon, and take your dark sorcery with you!

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

The funniest part is that some people will never understand the absolute crusade that some mathematicians might fight over this one day

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder if there’s a related infinite sequence which converges on 8?

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This sequence approximates an integer to arbitrary precision, not 8 specifically though, and never perfectly.

I tried it out using other bases, and the rule seems to be that doing this in base n results in n-2 with remainder n-1. So it doesn't ever actually converge, but the remainder becomes small very fast.

[–] match@pawb.social 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

never perfectly

eyes you in binary

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The sequence in base 2 is only 1/1.

Wonder how close base-16 gets.

FEDCBA987654321 / 123456789ABCDEF

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

Off by '1.82959E–16' !

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

Hmmmm.....

Edit: you can kinda think of it being 0, plus the 1/1 that would have ended up as a remainder in larger bases. In base 2, it just ends up being a full 1.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

(n * 8 + 1) / n

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 14 points 1 week ago

9876543210987654321 / 1234567890123456789 = 8,0000000729000

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You may call it an approxim8ion

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It contains the number 8 though. So how is that useful

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Well, simple. Jest substitute that 8 with the above approximation.

[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

It contains the numbers 8x10^7 and 8x10^1, but not 8x10^0

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] moonlight@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

See my other comment, it's no coincide– there's a pattern. I would love to see an actual proof for it though, I don't know enough to say why it behaves that way.

load more comments
view more: next ›