this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
1103 points (99.7% liked)

politics

23359 readers
3395 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Veteran 60 Minutes anchor Scott Pelley reported on Donald Trump’s efforts to strong-arm some of the country’s top law firms into doing his bidding on Sunday night’s episode of the embattled CBS newsmagazine.

Pelley’s segment pulled no punches in describing Trump’s efforts and reminding viewers that Trump is the “first felon” ever to sit in the Oval Office.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] courval@lemmy.world 22 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Make no mistake, the only reason we're seeing this in the media now is because big business is getting hit. Mostly a shot in the foot with tariffs but let's keep those boycotts up!

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Absolutely. This kind of media is owned (literally) by big business investors. I know it's obvious but it needs to be said plainly, mass media is the mouthpiece of the rich. It's no coincidence that Musk bought Xitter and Bezos bought Washington Post.

They will only cry alongside us when they're being hurt. They sure didn't care until now.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 20 points 16 hours ago

Only nine years too late.

Still, hope this marks the start of a trend.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

I hate 60 minutes but watched that on YouTube. Anything to piss on trumps shallow ego.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 31 points 22 hours ago

They hurt TRUMPS FEELINGS? DEPORT THEM!

-Fuck Your Feelings Conservatives!

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 116 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is what every journalist in America needs to be doing right now.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I would argue it's what every journalist in America should have been doing 8 FUCKING YEARS AGO, but no, they helped create this monster so they could report on it. They are a human/media centipede crossed with an Ouroboros eating it's own shit. Support independent media, not partisan sources in either direction, they're ALL compromised by capital.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

OK, but this is also what every journalist needs to be doing right now.

load more comments (3 replies)

With any luck this gives the fat orange duck a fatal heart attack.

[–] Bouzou@lemmy.world 101 points 1 day ago

It's insane, because it's not some sassy or hyperbolic report. It's perfectly measured and...logical. A well made report.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 52 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Extortion of law firms. What the fucking hell scared these businesses so much? Just stopping federal contracts with them?

And with that threat looming overhead, how do they not have the motivation to quietly resist? You want to talk about respecting the law and fighting back - that's who needs to do it.

Except they bent the knee anyway. We know they're just as complicit in the Regimes acts now.

And that's just one issue.

[–] Malek061@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of cowards in powerful positions.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

A lot of PAID cowards in powerful positions.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 22 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a shit spot to be in, as basically all of them work cases in federal court. If your lawyers are physically prevented entry to federal property because some orange buffoon bans the entire firm by the stroke of a pen, that law firm is completely impotent and unable to argue in federal cases, even those that don’t end up in a courtroom. Judges chambers, pre-trial motions, informal meetings, etc all are impossible or vastly more difficult.

It was a very targeted and deliberate move to put these firms in a lose:lose scenario - give an absurd amount of pro-bono work to your abuser, or wither and die as your clients are forced to move to another firm:

The orders threatened to bar attorneys from where they work, courthouses and federal agencies and cancel the contracts of law firm clients. For example, an aerospace company could lose its federal contracts if it stayed with the firm. A senior partner at one firm told us the president's orders were, quote, "diabolical." "Intended to bankrupt [us]."

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 13 points 21 hours ago

Man that's such a small detail I glossed over, that they can bar them from courthouses.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago

Lawyers and law firms lean very very heavily on relationships. Far too much honestly. Who your lawyer knows really shouldn't matter when it comes to legel matters, but often it means more than the law. So being in the sights of the leader of the republican party really reduces the image of a lawyer with connections. Thus it is very very bad for business.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 206 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Pretty terrifying honestly.

I'm kind of astonished that even republicans can't see anything wrong with everything happening. Like conservative ideals are one thing but dismantling the rule of law is a whole other thing.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I've lived in several countries and watched conservatives in all of them over half a century. Nothing I have seen has ever changed my view that conservatism is pathological selfishness disguised as a political philosophy. While other political movements agree on making life better for people in general but disagree on how to do it, conservatives indulge their personality disorder, call it politics, and demand to be taken as seriously as those who actually try.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

And it’s so overwhelmingly male and (usually) white. Though that can sway depending on country. Seems they want to go back to owning slaves. And feel equality is oppression somehow.

Though there is a growing amount of white ladies now I want to see rot in prison.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

The only reason why Trump’s approval rating has sunk a bit amongst conservatives is that tariffs are directly affecting them. As you said, they are selfishness incarnate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 104 points 1 day ago (20 children)

Uh... What did you think conservatives stood for again? Conservatism has always been about putting wealth in the hands of the few and scapegoating vulnerable people to distract the masses; everything else is camouflage.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pelley@lemmy.world 23 points 22 hours ago

Good on Pelley.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 81 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Jesus Christ. What subject, other than abject flattery, is Trump not sensitive about? No matter what they do, any story that's based remotely on fact is gonna piss that fragile little man off, so why not just have at him?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (25 children)

Trump is the biggest piece of shit America has ever produced.

load more comments (25 replies)

Glad legacy media still has a few balls left

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

As I always say, that'll teach'm.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone have a link to th video?

[–] xorollo@leminal.space 24 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-orders-target-law-firms-some-lawyers-say-that-threatens-rule-of-law-60-minutes-transcript/

I suspect it's this one. Looks like 60 minutes posts their show online on their website.

Edit-- turns out they also publish the show as a podcast (which I prefer)

60 Minutes

https://antennapod.org/deeplink/subscribe/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.megaphone.fm%2FCBS5826355202&title=60+Minutes

[–] knightmare1147@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I love this. It's kind of a rule of the internet that if you tell it to stop doing something it'll just make everyone more determined. I want to see every group that interacts with the administration be so resolute to give them shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago

This is real journalism, which has become increasingly rare these days. Everything else is just PR.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

That pesky first amendment comes back to bite again!

load more comments
view more: next ›