this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
595 points (99.3% liked)

196

3144 readers
1748 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 122 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

So, according to the motion filed on the 1st of may, which is what I assume the tweet is referencing, I think there are two things of note.

1st: When cornered at the McDonald’s, the police questioned him about his name and requested his id, then proceeded to ask him a bunch of different questions regarding his identity, the validity of his id, wether he had lied about his name, and any travel to New York. They, at no point at the McDonald’s, ever read him his Miranda rights, even after informing him that he was under investigation and detaining him, even after one officer told the others to read him his rights.

2nd: They moved his backpack to another table before informing him he was under investigation. They did not have a warrant to search his backpack, and given that it was far beyond his reach, and he was handcuffed when they began searching it, there was no reason to suspect anything in it would have been dangerous to the officers on sight. They found a computer chip in the bag while he was still inside, and did not “find” the loaded gun until he was outside and being driven to the precinct. After “finding” the gun, the officer searching the bag stated that they were searching it to make sure there “wasn’t a bomb or anything in here”. The motion I’m referencing suggests that this statement was a hasty attempt to justify the warrantless search post facto.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 37 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No one will ever convince me that the weapon they "found" wasn't drenched in Central Park pond water.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Or the trunk of a squad car

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 2 hours ago

Or already in the evidence locker.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 91 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve said from Day 1 that the entire arrest smelled like “accidentally” disabled body cams and planted evidence. The amount of shit they found him with was just too perfect to be real. This dude supposedly evaded a nationwide manhunt for an entire week, then got caught with the (easily disassembled) ghost gun and a hard copy of his manifesto?

You’re telling me this supposed criminal mastermind had an entire week to break apart and scatter his 3D printed gun, so it would never be traced back to him… And he didn’t? He chose to keep the entire thing in his backpack for cops to find?

And he had a manifesto in his bag ready to go, just in case he got caught? People who write manifestos do so because they expect to be caught, and want to make a statement. So why is this dude fleeing for an entire week before getting caught with his manifesto?

[–] Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago

Well, they need to have some plan to keep the peasants in line.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

It always seemed odd to me that someone who could so calmly pull off the murder of the CEO in the manner it was done and just casually bike off would end up caught the way Luigi was.

Caught quick because the city has security cameras in every store? Feels plausible. Caught after a long search after deep investigation? Feels plausible.

Caught after just enough time for the public to start getting rowdy, but not enough to have tracked him down through an investigation? Caught with the supposed weapon on him? Just feels off.

If he avoided capture for the time that he did, he should have had some opportunities to ditch the gun.

Motive seems off too. As far as has been released publicly, he was never a customer of the insurance company.

Whole thing stinks.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

How many trash cans are there in NYC? Over the course of a week he could have sprinkled a piece of that gun in each of the five Burroughs miles apart, but he just so happened to have it, still fully assembled, chilling in his bag. Apparently this “terrorist” took the time to write a whole manifesto but stopped planning after “gun goes bang” and just started wandering around and thus was so easy to catch.

I’ve walked through cow pastures that smelled better.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Edward Snowden has already said that facial recognition software is being widely used across America. They knew it was him and then planted the evidence. Government doesn't want you to know they are constantly recording and tracking your movements. Big Tech sell them your location data.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 1 points 4 hours ago

That is actually confirmed.

[–] ButteryNickel@lemmy.wtf 127 points 20 hours ago

Body cam footage had they potential to save the cops from these kinds of things. But they vilified it so strongly that it won't save her now.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 93 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

FINALLY they’re starting to make clear that this poor kid was picked as a patsy/fall guy because the cops were about to get French Revolution’d for their blatant favoring of the wealthy and extended incompetence. JFC.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 19 hours ago

I think it’s not the cops who were scared, but other executives who have done just as much harm, the cops probably just wanted the executives to shut the fuck up.

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 119 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 91 points 20 hours ago

I don’t know about you, but I’m getting some reasonable doubt of this accusation.🤔

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 32 points 18 hours ago

Even without all the extra bullshit surrounding the case, and even back when I was a high school republican douchebag who hadn't even voluntarily stayed home from church yet and still believed cops have our best interests in mind, I STILL would have said this sounds like complete bullshit and they planted evidence.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

If it's found that he didn't do it, will he get less popular because then he's not based anymore?

[–] Eldest_Malk@lemmy.world 74 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The defense doesn’t have to prove he didn’t do it. The prosecution has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did. He can be found not guilty by a variety of mechanisms, still have factually done it, but because the prosecution couldn’t verifiably prove it, get released. He can still be a symbol either way.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 33 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Frankly if I were on a jury this would be enough alone. I could not vote guilty if I knew this had happened. That is more than enough Reasonable Doubt. Not that this jury is going to be able to deliberate or anything. They're going to be bribed and or threatened so heavily that they're going to convict no matter what.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 85 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I’d say maybe some would think less of him, but I think he’d still deserve support for getting railroaded.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 20 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

My theory from the start is that they knew it was him, but found out via illegal means so they had to frame him some other way

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 14 points 15 hours ago

Definitely. They're claiming that a McDonald's worker called the cops on a nondescript (well, kinda attractive) white guy? A hundred Luigis eat there every day, and the "Bartender that remembers someone from three days ago" is an artifact of cop dramas.

When I worked in fast food, I called the customers "wallets with feet". Jeffrey Dahmer and Tim McVeigh could have come in together and I wouldn't have noticed.

[–] LogicalFallacy@lemm.ee 5 points 15 hours ago

This is most likely the case. He may be able to beat that charge, but juries are notoriously stupid.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 2 points 15 hours ago

And risk getting the case thrown out over all the other ways they're pushing their limits?

I doubt it.

Parallel Construction works if you can prove it by legal means. They wouldn't have needed to risk getting the whole thing nullified if they didn't bother with his Miranda Rights or getting caught planting evidence on him. Parallel Construction needs precision, and nothing NYPD is doing sounds precise in the slightest.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, of course.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 20 hours ago

I don’t think so, because then he’s an innocent person who was screwed over by the medical insurance industry, who then had his life derailed again in the name of “justice” for a dead insurance executive.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 7 points 15 hours ago

Enough people are thirsty for him that he can ride the notoriety and social cache for years, regardless. Of the people most into him, most don't care that much for the judicial system regardless, so the court's decision won't matter that much.

His views are oddly right wing and I don't think he's the sort to lead a movement, so he'll probably fade into obscurity in the general public.

[–] Didros@beehaw.org 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If doing some real heavy lifting here. Assume "if" he didn't do it the same things would be happening right now as if he had.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It was more of a hypothetical.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago

It should be the default assumption, even before all of the police fuckery was brought to light. He's innocent until proven guilty.

If he did do it is the hypothetical, since nothing has been proven and there's more and more evidence that makes it look like a frame job. Don't take the police account at face value ever, they routinely lie to cover for misconduct.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 19 hours ago

I knew he was innocent!

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 18 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I couldn't find a source for all of this, specifically the lapse in bodycam footage or that the backpack was brought to the precinct prior to the search. Still, if what his lawyer alleges is true, it should be ruled as an illegal search.

Sources: https://gothamist.com/news/search-of-mcdonalds-backpack-illegal-in-unitedhealthcare-ceo-murder-case-defense-says https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/28/us/luigi-mangione-evidence-illegal-search/index.html

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

Oh, I updated the body text now. Forgot earlier!