this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
807 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23397 readers
3447 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During a Senate hearing to review the FBI’s FY2026 budget request, Director Kash Patel was forced to admit that, despite the law requiring it, he had no such request ready to review.

This surprising development came during an awkward back-and-forth with Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), the ranking Democrat and Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, which oversees and approves budget requests.

Senator Murray reminded the FBI Director that the budget request was legally required “last week,” and after the director responded, she surprisedly added, “And your answer is you just understand you’re not going to follow the law?”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Why would any of Trump's administration care? None of them have been held accountable for anything, except to Trump.

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

yeah, Trump was accountable af, given that he ia now thw president again

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 150 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (16 children)

The fucking clownshow continues.

This is you going in to your Professor's office hours to ostensibly turn in your final paper for a course, it is half your grade in the class, and you actually just sit down and explain you are 'still working on it' and 'can i get it to you maybe by the end of next academic quarter?'

I am honestly so, so relieved by this high level public idiocy.

I really am not kidding.

I've struggled with impostor syndrome much of my life.

All gone. Done. No more.

I am legitimately more competent than almost everyone in this administration at their own jobs, despite the fact that I hardly have any relevant credentials to most of their positions.

My work involves emptying dog shit bins in public parks, and I'm also pretty sure I could do a better job than this guy. We could swap roles - except that I couldn't bring myself to kiss trump's flaccid saggy butt. I'll stick with the dogshit bins - I've got standards.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't sell yourself short. I bet you're more competent than everyone in this administration.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I am only hesitant to agree because:

1: I have terrible social anxiety (yay autism and trauma)

2: I assume, at least, some of them are competent people... at... at least something.

That being said, I also cannot think of a single one who falls into category 2.

Hrmm.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

You can recognise your own weaknesses, that already makes you more competent than most government officials in most countries.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

There are a couple evil yet competent people in the administration. Russell Vought is one, a hire direct from the Heritage Foundation. Another is Stephen Miller. Heritage seems to be full of actually competent yet completely evil men. But I guess that what happens when a majority of your funding comes from oil, gas, and now tech barons.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Not only are you personally more competant than anyone in this administration, but you're also not a Nazi (I'd imagine), which alone already makes you better than any Republican politician.

The fact that you think you might not be competant at the job is one of the things that makes you more competant (because you actually think before you act/speak).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

The "education" system is almost entirely based on privilege and indoctrination. Politicians are the cream of the crop.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 163 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I’m so tired of the theatrical outrage and shock and surprise. Of fucking course they’re working in bad faith. But no - let’s give all the fucking fascists the benefit of the doubt. You’re not allowed to be fucking surprised by this. It was all in the playbook. The playbook has been published openly on the internet since early 2020.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Its not tin-foil hat, it's Putin. Its always Putin, using Skum and HitlerPig as his muscle.

When will people truly internalize that the two biggest foreign Sociopathic Oligarchs, have partnered up with the most prolific traitor in American history? None of them have any loyalty or patriotism toward America, and only see us as a big, rich, fat, lazy target to be ruthlessly exploited and looted, and it's happening in real time before our eyes.

All they care about is money, and either Putin is paying them directly out of the Russian Treasury (HitlerPig would rape and murder his own mother for far less than a billion bucks, and Putin could order a lot more than that), or they've cut a deal to split the booty like the pirates they are.

When it's not working, it's working.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sfled@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago

He's moving the FBI to Kash accounting.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Dismantling the FBI seems like a good idea to me anyway. It's not like their mission is a good one. Maybe in the next government the FBI can be brought back as a federal agency that is narrowly focuses on investigating/punishing local/state level law enforcement.

But of course the Dems will just approve whatever budget the republicans come up with and facism will continue unabated.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 20 hours ago

Not if it means giving all their funding to the military and ICE...

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's actually a worse idea. There will still be, nominally, federal control, centralized in him. Other than that, every local and state FBI branch will act as, effectively, a terror cell - they work their own leads, make their own arrests on their own recognizance, and generally conduct business as they see fit. This makes for an incredibly dangerous form of secret police - they have no leaders above the local level, no real command and control, and they're all tasked with only one thing: make less crime.

Imagine the Cheka, but they're organized like al-Qaeda.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If their budget was zero'd out on the federal level where would the local FBI officers get their funding?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago

Get real, homie. The state will never defund itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 53 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Soooooo, zero budget for the FBI then.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No, they get a contigency budget of 20 bucks and this pallet of expired lunchables.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Pallet of Mr. Beast Lunchly

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why aren't we deporting this law breaker?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Who is "we"?

I'm not deporting people to foreign concentration camps for "breaking the law" because that's extremely wrong.

As far as the fash, they don't deport their own... yet.

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 0 points 14 hours ago

Meh. Congresspeople always pretend to be upset about something to posture for their base.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

President Donald Trump’s nomination of Patel to lead the FBI caused a raft of controversy. Patel had publicly pledged to take the agency down and turn its building into something of a “deep state” museum. His apparent lack of preparation for this fundamental hearing will give no solace to critics convinced he was not prepared for the task at hand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 41 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Wait, didn't this guy quit by not showing up to work for a few weeks? Am I thinking about another person?

[–] eRac@lemmings.world 56 points 1 day ago

He quit his second job by not showing up.

A guy living in an oligarchs mansion in Vegas was appointed director of 2 federal law enforcement agencies.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›