this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
271 points (90.4% liked)

Political Memes

8027 readers
3218 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I tried explaining my problems with tankies without calling them tankies. In fact, I used their own terminology to describe my disagreement with them. It, uh... well it doesn't make a lot of sense.

George Orwell fought in the Spanish civil war on the side of the Marxists. His army was betrayed by the Marxist-Leninists. After that experience, he wrote 1984, in which a totalitarian government uses "newspeak" to suppress dissent by suppressing the very ideas that people are capable of communicating. I don't think it's a coincidence that Marxist-Leninists describe their disagreements in terms that turn criticism of them into gibberish. I think it's exactly what Orwell was writing about based on his experiences.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When people say Communism had never been tried it's because communism is the end goal. It's the place we want to get to. A stateless, moneyless, classless society where everyone is truly equal. That's the ideal.

And Socialism is how we get there. Socialism is a scientific method of governance. It's not the insanity of "free-markets" nor is it the dictate of an autocrat. You need hospitals. You put the force of govt behind building hospitals and staffing them. You have a giant landmass so you need mass transit. You don't twiddle your thumbs waiting for the market winds to blow just right. You invest in building it. Because you need it. Because it's good for your people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

What? No, it's specifically Anarchists who want to speed run straight to communism. Marxists want to seize the state and guide it through a transitional stage (often called Socialism), which will end in the withering away of the state, and thus lead to Communism.

This was the whole nature of the split in the First International between Marx and Proudhoun.

To your point about Orwell, bringing up 1984 doesn't make a ton of sense here, as that's a book that is much more about fascism. Case in point, Immanuel Goldstein, the avatar of everything that Oceania opposes, is a man with a Jewish name.

Animal Farm, meanwhile, comes from Orwell's experience in the Spanish Civil War, where he was largely embedded with the Partido Obrero de Unificación Marxista (POUM). The POUM were more ideology diverse than history gives them credit for, but was largely composed of what we would today consider Trotskyists.

That experience, coupled with his experience as a journalist during WW2, unable to publish his trotskyist influenced criticisms of the USSR due to wartime state repression, ultimately lead him to write Animal Farm.

The Stalin analogue pig is named Napoleon in large part due to debates between MLs and Trotskyists about the nature of world historical revolutions, since their only point of comparison was France, which ended up with Napoleon in charge. Was Stalin a Napoleon of Socialism? Was that a necessary phase in these sorts of revolutionary processes? Things like that are what Animal Farm is gesturing towards.

All of that aside though. I think it's needlessly limiting to lop yourself off into an ideological box and say "Only my pet socialist experiment is the Real one!"

As Socialists, Communists, Anarchists, etc. Whatever our ideological convictions, we all have the same ultimate goal, and are apart of the same broad tradition.

I have stark disagreements with my Anarchist friends, but they're still my comrades, and I still respect many things about their commitment to direct action, and will defend their political projects, current and historic, to the hilt. Our struggle is ultimately the same, and we have much to learn from one another.

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

And that is why tankies cream their panties for dictators with imperialist ideas. Got it.

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Marxist-Leninists describe their disagreements in terms that turn criticism of them into gibberish. I think it’s exactly what Orwell was writing about based on his experiences.

Nail on the head. There's a particularly active lemming from the tankie instances that always, and purposefully, devolves everything into arguing about everyone else using words incorrectly.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think this meme is referenced to this quote Orwell wrote after fighting for and living the revolution in Spain.

Except for the small revolutionary groups which exist in all countries, the whole world was determined upon preventing revolution in Spain. In particular the Communist Party, with Soviet Russia behind it, had thrown its whole weight against the revolution. It was the Communist Party thesis that revolution at this stage would be fatal and that what was to be aimed at in Spain was not workers' control, but bourgeois democracy. It hardly needs pointing out why 'liberal' capitalist opinion took the same line.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I need to read up on this. Spain in 1936 seems like one of those points in history that waaaaaay too much shit is quietly connected to. What little I know of it comes from For Whom The Bell Tolls

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This meme describes anarchists. Are you sure you know what the terms mean?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Many anarchists are also communists. So I’m not sure I follow.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (5 children)

OP is talking about tankies and ML and how he doesn't like them, but the meme he posted doesn't describe those.

alsoAnarchists are communists. No one thinks anarcho-capitalists are anarchist except themselves and those they've misinformed.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I'm agender

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The subset of communists that do not support a state-backed socialist transition and argue for direct implementations of communism are precisely (mostly) anarchists/libertarians, i think that's what they were saying, so this would be compatible with them being communists.

[–] System_below@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not really. I mean yes Anarchists believe that the state inherently breeds authoritarianism and should not be seized but abolished. However, most Anarchists believe in horizontal systems of governance with no centralisation of power, which is different to communism.

Anarchists believe and they are correct, that Marxism, M-L ect are authoritarian and violent.

[–] Takapapatapaka@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Communist is a broad word, and i think we have not the same meaning in mind.

To the very core, communism is to think that private property should be abolished. Marx was the most influential thinker of this, and we nowadays call 'communist' all the thinkers and movments that inherit Marx (Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Trotsky, etc.). But anarchists also belong to the very root of communism, they just dont follow Marx (historically, they belonged to the First Internationale and were banned by marxists, with Bakunin as their main figure).

Horizontal system of governance can be communism in its broad sense if there is no private property. This explains some movments like 'libertarian communism', which are closer to anarchism than to marxism. But yes, if we equate communism and marxism, anarchists are no communists.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›