LibertyLizard

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 hours ago

No. I think it’s a pretty shitty thing to do unless you had a reason to feel unsafe, which I personally never have.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

I think democrats would, for the most part. Perhaps less enthusiastically, but since they hate Trump, I think it would not be a major issue.

The question is, how would low-information unaffiliated voters respond to having a socialist in the ballot? This is a difficult question to answer. Traditionally socialism is a bad word in US politics, albeit less so with younger voters.

Personally I don’t really buy the “Bernie would have won” stuff but there’s really only one way to find out.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s such a broad body of work that it’s hard to list all of the issues I have it it. I guess the biggest issue is just that Marx’s writings were an early attempt at describing a more rigorous case for social reform before more scientific theories of social change and economics were developed. So while his ideas were groundbreaking and innovative at the time they were written, not all of them have held up or are relevant to today’s world. And yet I don’t see many Marxists who have been willing to seriously dissect his ideas and take the useful ideas while discarding the bad or irrelevant ones. And in fact, those few who are willing to take a more critical stance are often ostracized and deemed “revisionists” which strikes me as a frankly absurd accusation. If you are not revising your theories then they are no longer theories but mere dogma, and that seems to be the state of mainstream Marxism today.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago (11 children)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for posting this here. I don’t understand how this article was a violation of the rules on the LW politics community. Perhaps the mod simply did not like the content.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don’t obey in advance. With the exception of the Supreme Court, most other systems and protections remain in place and may continue to exist regardless of Trump’s intentions, especially if they are fought for and protected.

But direct action of the type the author is discussing has been very successful across many contexts, including brutal dictatorships with no human rights guarantees. So the whole thrust of your comment fails to grapple with the real history of popular struggle.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is the dilemma that I can’t take the tram to my foraging grounds? If so I agree that is a problem.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Haha yeah he’s not too memorable otherwise but it’s a funny mistake since Romney and Trump hate each other.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Romney? Did you mean Perry?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why do you think he was selected for AG?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The crackdown against activists in the UK is getting very serious. If people don’t wake up and push back it may be the beginning of a very dark time.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago

The conflation of property destruction (especially of extremely wealthy businesses) and violence against people is extremely silly.

 

A conversation about adapting to sea level rise in California using nature-based solutions. Solarpunk even gets a shoutout.

 

An interesting overview of this CIA document which, if you’ve spent much time discussing politics on Lemmy, you’ve probably heard of. But the existence and meaning of the document is not as simple as many believe.

 

A well-researched video that explains why some dense urban areas are quite expensive.

TL;DW: Despite a substantial historic housing stock, our most expensive cities have built very little housing in recent years, leading to very low vacancy rates and high prices. Ramping up housing construction will be a necessary part of solving the affordability crisis.

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/13574268

A really innovative study that went beyond statistical association and actually planted trees in low-tree neighborhoods and measured the impacts.

After the plantings, the research team reassessed residents' health. They found that those living in the greened area had 13-20% lower levels of a biomarker of general inflammation, a measure called high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) than those living in the areas that did not receive any new trees or shrubs. Higher levels of hsCRP are strongly associated with a risk of cardiovascular disease and are an even stronger indicator of heart attack than cholesterol levels. Higher CRP levels also indicate a higher risk of diabetes and certain cancers.

A reduction of hsCRP by this percentage corresponds to nearly 10-15% reduction in the risk of heart attacks, cancer or dying from any disease.

Although several previous studies have found an association between living in areas of high surrounding greenness and health, this is the first study to show that a deliberate increase in greenness in the neighborhood can improve health.

 

A really innovative study that went beyond statistical association and actually planted trees in low-tree neighborhoods and measured the impacts.

After the plantings, the research team reassessed residents' health. They found that those living in the greened area had 13-20% lower levels of a biomarker of general inflammation, a measure called high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) than those living in the areas that did not receive any new trees or shrubs. Higher levels of hsCRP are strongly associated with a risk of cardiovascular disease and are an even stronger indicator of heart attack than cholesterol levels. Higher CRP levels also indicate a higher risk of diabetes and certain cancers.

A reduction of hsCRP by this percentage corresponds to nearly 10-15% reduction in the risk of heart attacks, cancer or dying from any disease.

Although several previous studies have found an association between living in areas of high surrounding greenness and health, this is the first study to show that a deliberate increase in greenness in the neighborhood can improve health.

 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/12967591

A short film about war. Just watch it.

 

A short film about war. Just watch it.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19329231

We’ve seen a lot of media chatter about these AI generated foraging books and unfortunately I think the danger is real. Be careful what information you absorb and make sure it is from a reputable source.

Although, to be completely fair, I’ve seen plenty of wrong or misleading information from books authored by humans as well.

 

Pretty pathetic for democrats to be collaborating with Exxon in 2024.

view more: next ›