this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
2071 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

7674 readers
2241 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sausa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 19 hours ago

Katy Montgomerie a really good interview with one of the women at the protest: https://youtu.be/wbA0q0eqYnM

[–] Maximumbird@lemm.ee 58 points 1 day ago

Fucking Genius

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 141 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It would have been icing on the cake if trans men would have been in the same protest, also topless, but they weren't censored lol

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (5 children)

To many in alt right groups, trans men don't exist.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, cis dudes would work in that context too, no?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anivia@feddit.org 10 points 20 hours ago

Took me a while to even notice they are censored, and not just weird looking

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I cannot imagine being a cop in this country the laws are just totally arbitrary and you'd have to enforce them even though they make zero sense.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 91 points 1 day ago

Malicious compliance at its best.

[–] wolfrasin@lemm.ee 162 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Legendary behavior. Bigots can choke on it

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 365 points 1 day ago (9 children)

SOMETIMES A CHECKMATE IS JUST SO FUCKING POETIC.

Butters: weiners out!

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 140 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For real, this is such a great move. Oh sure, the government could just ban nipples in general, but good luck enforcing that when it gets mildly warm and every scottish man rips their shirt off

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

is that the "red wave" they've been warning us about?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 109 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call a brilliant catch-22 situation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 70 points 1 day ago

Damn, these people are bold as fuck. Get it!

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

In America most men are overweight or obese and have pendulous lumps on their chests with nipples attached. Personally I don't love seeing them, but when the weather is right, they are all over the goddamn place. It's absolutely ludicrous that women can't do the same. If there were any logical rule it would be don't show your chesticles unless you are a woman who uses them for feeding a child OR everybody gets to have their tits out regardless of any gender types. Pick one and go with it, but the current laws are base AF.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

When I was in pre-K, on a really hot day, I remember asking why the boys got to take off their shirts but I couldn’t.

Now that I’ve had top surgery, I can be the fat hairy bearded guy that mows lawns shirtless. It’s nice.

[–] PagPag@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mow with a long sleeve that’s rated for 15fpf, skin cancer is a real concern. Stay safe out there fam

load more comments (1 replies)

Sure, but it's a ridiculous privilege. Let's face it, many men have what meets the criteria for breasts. If we decide that breasts are outside of the Overton window then shirt those bitches up, all of them. If we are saying breasts on women are the only breasts outside the window then that's just plain old discrimination. Shift the window or cover them all up until we are ready to let them all out.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I'm happy for you that it worked out in the end.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In other parts of the world nudity isn't seen as a big deal or in some cases even unusual in certain settings. Americans are so afraid of seeing a titty or penis or whatever else.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

I mean in some parts it's not as big a deal yes. There are plenty of parts where it is like this. I think America is a good example primarily because so many American men have tits.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 32 points 1 day ago

Austin actually has a city ordinance with more or less this exact logic. Once you’ve seen a dozen or so average women with their chests uncovered at the pool, it loses any excitement it may have initially held.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 190 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

Another example of the Scots fighting for freedom .... they've been doing it successfully for thousands of years and they're still doing it!

I will never in my life ever understand the fight against gay, lesbian, bi, queer, LGBTQ+

They are a fraction of the population yet the majority causes them immeasurable harm simply because they exist. The louder they persecute, the more prominent LGBTQ+ movement becomes .... it's contradictory. If conservatives had just left them alone, there would almost be no issue about any of this at all.

There are far more important debates and fights to be had in our society .... namely the fight to preserve the survivability of our species in the coming centuries ... yet here we are fighting about who gets to show or not show their tits!!!!

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 94 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Conservatives need a demographic to hate. This one is perfect because they will never be Conservatives, and most hardcore Conservatives can't stand to see homosexual PDA.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they will never be Conservatives

I wish that were true, but I have family that is deeply conservative and so is her wife.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I will never in my life ever understand the fight against gay, lesbian, bi, queer, LGBTQ+

One argument is that any (fictional) male can just put on a wig and a dress and enter any "women designated" area.

The people making this argument are usually men and rarely has an actual incident occurred.

(This opinion is based on trying to give Graham Linehan a benefit of doubt)

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 137 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Tits censored, guess they are women then. Fuck the transphobes

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

actually proud of Scotland for once, not the government but the people

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's the UK supreme court, not a Scottish court, that decided to stomp over all the progress we had made with trans rights.

The Scottish Parliament tends to be considerably more left wing than the UK Parliament. Left to their own devices they would probably be much more like a Scandinavian country.

But actually, yes, the Scottish people are indeed awesome.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LadyButterfly@lazysoci.al 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Love the message, but the blurb isn't correct. Police couldn't not arrest them because it would define them as a woman, outraging public decency and similar laws don't require specific genders.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I had a look further into this, because I wanted to better understand what factors might cause an act to be considered indecent exposure (or outraging public decency). This led me to some guidance on naturism and other non-sexual nudity, from the crown prosecution service.^1 It appears that having an "intention to cause alarm or distress" may be relevant for protests like this — arguably the entire point of the protest is to use the shock value of the nudity as a protest.

That being said, I think it's a bold move and possibly an effective protest. Even if public indecency laws are gender neutral, it would still be a strong message if any of these women got arrested for this — the reason why these women are capable of causing alarm or distress by going topless is because these are "female presenting nipples" (to use a heavily-memed phrase from the Tumblr porn ban era)


load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 98 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Biological women can do it too if they print and cut out pics of men nipples and stick them on top.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

Hmm...

spoiler


Pretty sure it's just a bug in the federation of images between blahaj.zone and lemmy.world, but it was a funny coincidence.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›