this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38869 readers
398 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 56 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Well, clearly this is gonna be something that every republican will oppose, right? Riiiight? The government tracking citizens with a database?? My conspiracy theory neighbor bitches about this all the time. He's gonna oppose this, right?????

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

2006'es Alex Jones would have gone mental over this.

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 days ago

Something something accusing their opposition of doing the thing that they either are currently doing, or 100% would be doing if they had the opportunity.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago

It will be used to track who owns a gun!

Maybe not, but the fact that it could, should get them to oppose it.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 5 days ago

Hypocrisy is considered a strength. So they're definitely not against it.

[–] Gaywallet@beehaw.org 37 points 5 days ago

Already not a fan of Palantir, this is pretty bad news

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] remington@beehaw.org 16 points 5 days ago

Here's an archive link of that NY Times article: https://archive.is/tXBRJ

Well the half-good news is, judging by Palantir's track record of managing large public projects elsewhere, that project is bound to bankrupt the US once and for all so people can build something new. The bad news is, it's probably only going to happen late within the first fifteen years of the 'two-year' contract.

[–] GaetanLaberge@lemm.ee 11 points 5 days ago

The sprawling bureaucracy needed to analyze and maintain such a database will be so costly in comparison to its actual value that it's already amusing to think about.

[–] Rustic_Fry@literature.cafe 5 points 5 days ago

Databases aren't fireproof. This seems like a good reason to kick things off.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

Afaik this is basically what the NSA's Prism is.