this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
192 points (96.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

41315 readers
1637 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How is someone that gets out of breath eating a donut going to protect and serve anyone?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Echo5@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Heard from a local cop that it had something to do with the union. If the department wants to implement a standard the union would require something or other. Something about an incentive? I didn’t get the whole picture obviously. I know police need unions in case somebody sues them but does seem kind of dumb that it’s so difficult to enforce a physical standard.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 4 hours ago

They are not required to serve and protect. US courts say so.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 hours ago

Our law enforcement is a huge joke and the meh pay, high turnover rate, and low bar of entry attracts the type of people you wouldn't want to be associated with to begin with.

But also, why are small framed 5'3 women allowed to be police?

Fact is, most cops can't outrun or overpower a lot of criminals who chose to resist or flee. In actuality that's a pretty tiny part of the job. The rest is tickets, reports, paperwork, arrests with no resistance, investigations, etc. you don't have to be an athlete or even very physically fit to do any of that. Id rather deal with a fat cop that isn't a dick more than a slim one who's a dumbass.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 180 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Neither protecting or serving are actual job requirements.

[–] LemmyIsReddit2Point0@lemmy.world 37 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The "no duty to protect" doctrine. Our news doesn't even have to be factual.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I think NPR or PBS can't lie on the news or over the air public local news. The over the air news usually will have a PSA opinion piece and it's usually by the owners and mostly sways right. Cable news is free for all and one sided.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is a common misconception in the U.S., it’s not even the car’s job… that crappy sticker has the shittiest union.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That sticker was exclusive to the LAPD, but it kept turning up in films made in Hollywood set elsewhere, so other regions adopted it eventually too.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Man, that kind of figures… I bet it was a PR campaign that they paid for. So in a way we all got value out of that lie… nope. No satisfying conclusion to be found here 😒

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

From what I've seen, they don't even learn about the law and often break the law by illegal detainment, searches and confiscation. Cops who served for over 20 years but don't know people their rights. They often get minimal training while having to serve alone where everyone carries a gun. That's asking for problems. And now cops in the US are militarized with heavy combat gear, while the majority is white and racist. So obesity is the least of the problems with US police.

[–] absolutejank@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

to give an answer to a rhetorical question: because firing people based on weight is a can of worms being opened. while it's still technically not illegal to fire someone because their weight makes them "unfit," the ada can be invoked if said obesity is caused by a disorder (e.g., type 1 diabetes). this ignores the fact that it's hard to prove that someone would be unfit just for their weight; it just opens up employers to lawsuits. a simpler way to think about it would be to ask yourself if the guy handing out speeding tickets is "unfit for duty" solely because he's obese.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 6 points 5 hours ago

The easy way around this is to require passing regular fitness tests. If your obesity isn't an impediment to the fitness test, then it shouldn't be an impediment to your job.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 56 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

Cities in pretty much the entire country are running with an understaffed police force. They'll take what they can get. I'm 100% pro Union, but another problem is that police unions help protect unfit (literally and figuratively) police from being forced to try harder by abusing protected status health claims. I've seen in both police and military, they are handed paperwork if they are not meeting fitness expectations, but nothing ever comes of it.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 39 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

Police unions are the only bad union.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago

All labor unions are good. Police unions are not.

This is because police unions are not labor unions, since police are not labor but rather the enforcers for the owner class.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 11 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

They’re illegal in many other countries

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Cities in pretty much the entire country are running with an understaffed police force.

Counterpoint: Americans are already overpoliced and the "understaffing" is only relative to the authoritarians' desire to make us even more so.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

Makes sense. Maybe they wouldn't be understaffed if they were utilized in places that actually mattered to people

[–] derry@midwest.social 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago

...well shit. Too smart to be an officer is a thing.

[–] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 7 points 6 hours ago

You’re really setting yourself up here

[–] Sprinks@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I...i didnt realize this needed staffing...

[–] sprite0@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

get to work

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

France doesn’t let the police unionize, it’s the only group in the country explicitly and expressly forbade from unionizing. Police should never be allowed to unionize

[–] kaki@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

The only group that can't unionize is the military, there's plenty of police unions in France.

[–] octobob@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago

I live in Pittsburgh and there are literally no cops on duty from like 3-5 AM or something. We haven't had a police chief in years, and I never see cops unless there's a violent crime or a car accident or overdose. You can kinda do whatever you want in terms of traffic laws. I've never even heard of someone getting a traffic ticket in the city, and most times if you're actually goin the speed limit you're a hazard that isn't following the flow of traffic. Completely different story in the suburbs outside the city.

It kinda rules not gonna lie.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Additionally, cities that want physically fit officers have unions that demand that they are paid to work out. Cities don't want to pay for that.

So, usually the fitness requirements are only used when applying but aren't used when you are in the force.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 8 hours ago

cities that want physically fit officers have unions that demand that they are paid to work out

Seems fairly reasonable to me

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Just as well as any other cop

[–] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 33 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Reminds me of my favorite Simpson’s quote.

Marge (to Bart): “Your father wanted to be a police officer but they said he was too heavy.”

Homer: “No the army said I was too heavy, the police said I was too dumb.”

[–] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Considering how dumb the police chief is on that show, I think it was an intentional joke

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 62 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Cops with guns don't have to run.. 🤷‍♂️

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

All the other kids with the pumped up kicks
You better run, better run outrun my gun

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Kind of an over amplification. Yeah, cops should ideally be fit-ish but even an obese person with a gun or a tazer can protect people, maybe not as well but still, and that doesn't take into account the fact that a lot of cops are not actually on the streets but rather in an office doing paperwork etc. The problems are:

  • There are maybe not enough cops that are fit for actual fights?
  • Cops are ridiculously undertrained and unfiltered, giving us all if these assholes that really just like power.
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 23 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Never met anyone who was too fat to shoot minorities.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, where are they? Most cops I've seen personally wouldn't even qualify as regular obese, let alone morbidly.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

In a small Midwest town, if the police force has more than 3 members, I bet half of them are classified as obese.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Non joke answer: A bunch of reasons. Many precincts are understaffed, so they need all the hands they can get. The police union is huge and makes it extremely difficult to fire even the most homer-simpsonian individuals. Many of the hugely obese cops are assigned to "light duty" meaning the most exertion they face is paperwork, manning the public information desk and or doing things like serving writs (in some cases you're allowed to wear the uniformn even if you're not a bonded officer, which is absurd). Additionally, fitness requirements are actually fairly rare across the whole spectrum of law enforcement - It's surprisingly rare to see them for any positions besides uniformed patrol officer, even detectives or etc. aren't always required to pass them - and even when you do, they're usually pathetically easy to pass.

[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 9 points 9 hours ago

They just need to be able to drive a car and pull the trigger on their gun

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Everyone’s so fucking obese here that most people don’t notice.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The point is to punish, not to protect. Fatasses can punish just fine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 6 points 9 hours ago

Cops don't exist to protect you and they don't have to be physically fit to serve their purpose: using the threat of violence and the prison industrial complex to protect the interests of capital.

[–] Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 hours ago

I believe that they are not allowed. Some of them just are.

load more comments
view more: next ›