this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
94 points (97.0% liked)

News

30274 readers
4141 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As the city of Portland, Oregon, clawed its way out of the pandemic, it faced a new set of crises: The city’s homeless population was growing. Tents lined some city blocks. High-powered business associations held press conferences demanding the city remove homeless people and touted self-funded surveys saying that without action, businesses and residents would flee the city.

By late spring 2021, the city committed to a new strategy that then-Mayor Ted Wheeler said would “reprioritize public health and safety among homeless Portlanders,” ultimately allocating $1.3 billion by the end of 2024.

But although the city spent roughly $200,000 per homeless resident throughout that time, deaths of homeless people recorded in the county quadrupled, climbing from 113 in 2019 to more than 450 in 2023, according to the most recent data from the Multnomah County Health Department. The rise in deaths far outpaces the growth in the homeless population, which was recorded at 6,300 by a 2023 county census, a number most agree is an undercount. The county began including newly available state death records in its 2022 report, which added about 60 deaths to the yearly tolls.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago

I said this in another thread about this article: They're just flatly dividing the 1.3 billion total budget that was allocated over the years by the 6,300 number of homeless counted in 2023.

This budget likely includes programs serving homeless populations as a whole and its staffing, administration, etc. Given the time period this likely includes program funding that started, and then ended, with special funding local health juridictions recieved during covid.

Source: worked in the region in question in a local health juridiction through covid. Cutting programs and keeping police sweeps didn't help the homeless but it tended to satiate the local businesses and residences impactes.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So the bit of the article quoted doesnt cover the salient points its making. It reads as if its saying "spending more on the homeless is bad" when actually its saying "bad policy can cost more and make things worse".

The death rate went up because Portland started aggressive anti-honeless techniques of sweeps to clear homeless encampments and a reduction of longer term stable housing in favour of short term shelters.

What the article is saying is Portland enacted bad and expensive policies that have made the situation worse not better.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Who is surprised that systematically destroying the meager shelters that people have created to protect themselves, would amount to more deaths from exposure and malnutrition?

I don't understand how anyone can look at that and think of it as a solution unless they would prefer the homeless people die.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Many taxpayers would prefer the homeless die.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Well it turns out, I too, would prefer that those taxpayers died. They can literally eat my shit.

[–] UlyssesOnlyOnce@lemmy.coffee 6 points 5 days ago

This article was produced with reporting done by Street Roots. Street Roots continues to be the most important local outlet for the Portland homeless and houseless community. They feature regular articles about state and local policy effecting their live and highlight artistic voices within the community.

Show them some love and visit the site.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Terrible policy had a terrible outcome, what a surprise. Of course spending more money on harassing the homeless caused more deaths, especially with the winter they just had.

We could have spent 1.3 billion building affordable homes. That also, by definition, makes them not homeless.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

WTF... Portland had the winning recipe already - those little micro homes on parking lots were working great

Fucking hell, why would you destroy the shanty towns before you give them somewhere better to stay??

I was about ready to fight you and all... Why can't we have nice things...

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Manny of them don't want to live there. Those micro homes are just for show. Always have been.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I wonder how much socialized medicine $1.3 billion could create?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

City leaders began moving homeless people out of public view by removing tents at a rate far surpassing those of its West Coast peers. Since 2021, it carried out 19,000 sweeps, and it dismantled over 20 encampments per day in 2024, according to city records.

We are very puzzled why spending more money on harassing homeless people increased the death rate?

Homeless residents in Multnomah County die, on average, more than 30 years earlier than the average U.S. life expectancy of 78

WTF?! That's a life expectancy for homeless people of only 48 years!!

Another example of how American society is sociopathic. According to the numbers of the article, the death rate was an insane 8% !!!
USA is not a civilized country.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

These deaths came during the same period that Portland began a two-pronged response to public pressure over homelessness. City leaders began moving homeless people out of public view by removing tents at a rate far surpassing those of its West Coast peers. Since 2021, it carried out 19,000 sweeps, and it dismantled over 20 encampments per day in 2024, according to city records.

At the same time, the city reduced money for stable permanent housing while dramatically increasing its investment in temporary shelters. The city spent $19.4 million to house formerly homeless Portlanders in 2019, according to the city budget. By 2024, the city budgeted $4.3 million, which housed 391 people.

They got what they paid for

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but the dream of the 90s...

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Let me let you in on a little secret: television isn't real.

Only rich asshats get to pretend Portland is still like that.

A bohemian artist hasn't been able to make solid living and afford rent in Portland since probably a few years before the show even started.

Anyone else remember the video of Fred Armisen going through downtown Portland surrounded by corporate culture and being like "this is the real Portland"?

Fucking New Yorkers man.