this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
438 points (99.3% liked)

News

30260 readers
4004 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 29 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

the issue was already personal, pitting service against citizenship

For the record, no, it's pitting unconstitutional orders against sworn duty.

I don't want the military to decide any outcomes, but I do think just about time they let everyone involved know that the military's only loyalty is to the people and the constitution. Yes, they take orders from the president, but we have checks and balances for a reason, and I'd feel better if the military just stated plainly their primary goal is to keep it that way.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

While that would be nice, this would potentially make Trump try to purge "non-loyal" officers even harder.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is why such a revolution doesn't start from the masses, but from someone higher up who gives the command and then people follow them.

If a lowly soldier disobeys, he's removed. And grass-roots doesn't work for that kind of stuff.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Trump has been getting rid of higher ups, they aren't protected.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

That makes everything pretty difficult.

What generally triggers military coups is that one of these higher-ups rebels when or after they are removed.

But yeah, there's a time window for that and it's closing rapidly.

There won't be a rebellion by the people. There hardly can be one, without a rebellion by the military.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, which is why in the other comment chain we were talking about the right moment. Tip your hand too soon and you're just getting purged.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

True, but it only works if there will actually be a rebellion started by some higher-up.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

Then there's no point to any of these hypotheticals, is there??

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Anything to make Trump's dismantlement of democracy even just a tiny bit harder is a good thing.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

My fear is that it would make it easier, by singling out who needs to be purged.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If they stay compliment with Trump, they won't need to be purged anyways as they are complient at that point.

If they pick the right moment to resist, they can at least tie up lawyers and/or millitarty personnel up with court marshalls, spending money, resources, and manpower to keep them in military prison, ect.

And besides that, its literally in their oath to disobey unlawful orders, so if something is blatently unconstitutional and immoral I would expect every good soldier to follow their oath rather than their orders.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I don't disagree with any of this, but it's kind of precisely why coming out and saying what teawrecks wants them to say before that right moment is foolhardy at best imo.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

In other words, your saying that they should keep a low profile until the moment they need to disobey? Makes sense.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, exactly this.

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 40 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

But on that morning in March, Guardado got a strange phone call at work. Some sort of public safety officer had dialed her office and wanted her to come outside to talk. In the parking lot, three men in plain clothes identified themselves as Department of Public Safety officers, Correa told The War Horse. As Shirly approached, they said her car had been involved in an accident. But when she got close, they grabbed her and handcuffed her, telling her they were ICE agents.

The fuck.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 hours ago

Literal fucking criminals committing legally sanctioned kidnappings in broad daylight.

Fuck this country.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 24 points 15 hours ago

Anyone still think this is OK?

You know who you are, and if you think this is OK, then fuck you

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 59 points 19 hours ago

But on that morning in March, Guardado got a strange phone call at work. Some sort of public safety officer had dialed her office and wanted her to come outside to talk. In the parking lot, three men in plain clothes identified themselves as Department of Public Safety officers, Correa told The War Horse. As Shirly approached, they said her car had been involved in an accident. But when she got close, they grabbed her and handcuffed her, telling her they were ICE agents.

Can't trust anyone.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 179 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Remember this, service men and women, when you are given your orders to oppress us.

You are also one of the oppressed.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 39 points 23 hours ago

Just a little lower on the list.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 97 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Army Sgt. Ayssac Correa had just started his day at the 103rd Quartermaster Company outside of Houston on the morning of March 13 when he got a phone call from his sister-in-law.

She worked at the same company as Correa’s wife and had just pulled into the parking lot to see three ICE agents handcuffing her.

“They’re taking Shirly away!” she told him.

Imagine getting that call. We've definitely become evil.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 hours ago

It's not we that have become evil. I think it's imperative that people properly consider who is doing the evil shit.

Many years ago I was visiting some country in Central America, and they were not angry that I was American even though the American government had done horrible things to their country, because they knew that I had no control over what those crazy motherfuckers did.

And that doesn't mean that everyone is powerless, that we shouldn't try to make a difference. That's a different conversation.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 77 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

My wife is Mexican-American. She was born here, and I fear that call. ICE is rounding up everyone that they “suspect” is undocumented. I’m afraid that she’ll get picked up and lost in the system before I can bring proof of citizenship.

What ICE is doing is evil. I can’t believe this is my country after only a few months, and I fear what will happen in a few years.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 44 points 21 hours ago

the proof doesn't matter when they're not bothering to check; ask kilmar obrego garcia.

i had family members that were born and raised in this country and deported during the last bought of xenophobia that this country went through during ww2; the most recent one ended up living out the rest of his life and dying in mexico.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 98 points 1 day ago

Fascist dictators don't have loyalty, soldier. That's a key element to them.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Me being in the military—I felt bad that it was happening, because I’m also married to somebody who’s going through the [immigration] process. But I was like, ‘Oh, there’s no way this is going to happen to us,’” he said.

That misconception is common, immigration attorneys and advocates told The War Horse. But in reality, there is no guaranteed path to citizenship for undocumented military family members—and no guaranteed protections against deportation.

[–] supernight52@lemmy.world 64 points 23 hours ago

And that's how you know exactly who that idiot voted for. Now he's getting the day he asked for, and it's no longer fun.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 60 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

“Surely my king won’t deport my wife”

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 37 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

He is, and don't call him Shirley.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 39 points 23 hours ago

No one can call Shirly, she's getting deported.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 34 points 22 hours ago

Daughter: Daddy, why do you work for the people who kidnapped Mommy? Correa: I don’t, sweetheart. I’m in the Army. The Army doesn’t deport people. ICE does. Daughter: They both take orders from the president, though, right? Correa: well, yeah. Daughter: So, why do you work for the man who ordered ICE to kidnap Mommy? Correa: …

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 31 points 22 hours ago
[–] Nusm@piefed.zip 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Where are you seeing he was a trumper?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago

But I was like, ‘Oh, there’s no way this is going to happen to us,’” he said.

It's not definitive, but it's a big fucking clue.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 21 hours ago

Odds are pretty good giving that he's in the military. The Latino people I know who were ex military are Trump 100%.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

A single quote saying he felt bad about the ICE deportations, I think. I didn't see anything in there that was direct.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago

Nobody is safe.

[–] SieYaku@chachara.club 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And they have a baby only 10 months old!! My baby is a little bit older but still, can't imagine if something like that just came and split us, it would be very traumatic for everyone.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago

And if Trump has his way, that baby will someday get deported too. The dad should be glad the baby wasn't with mom when they kidnapped her. They might have taken the baby too.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 25 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

what does the military say to recruits that so thoroughly dupes them into thinking the government gives half a rat's ass about them?

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The main thing is ~13y of indoctrination in our schools starting with pledge every day and the whitewashing of our history.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 5 points 19 hours ago

"you aint seen nuthin yet"

-GOP

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nobody is safe from the ~~Commander~~Leopard in Chief

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 3 points 19 hours ago

That should be the leopards ate my face mascot