this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
81 points (96.6% liked)

GenZedong

4302 readers
205 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The British Royal Navy has reportedly abandoned a century-old custom of employing Chinese laundrymen on its warships because of fears that they could be coerced by Beijing into stealing military secrets.

UK officials are so concerned about the Navy’s traditional ‘servants’, who hail mostly from Hong Kong, that Nepalese Gurkhas are being hired to replace them, The Sun newspaper reported on Monday. “Spy catchers fear Beijing could threaten laundrymen’s loved ones in China to make them pass on Navy secrets,” the newspaper said.

Hundreds of Chinese laundrymen have worked on British warships – cleaning and pressing sailors’ uniforms and officers’ tablecloths – since the early 1900s, when Hong Kong was a UK colony. The tradition began as a local custom and developed to involve a steady supply of laborers from contractors in Hong Kong.

Former First Sea Lord Admiral Lord West said it was disappointing to see the tradition end. “If it is a question of security, the Navy has no choice, but it’s sad, as Chinese laundrymen have fought wars with us,” he told The Sun. “Some have died for us.”

Just astonishing colonial mentality. Comical if it wasn't so disgusting.

Goodness knows I guess they have to maintain their weird hierarchy of powdered wig wearing aristocracy officer freaks at the top then the enlisted fodder but at least make the enlisted fodder feel better by having them served by colonial slaves they can look down on.

(Original RT link: https://www.rt.com/news/585633-uk-navy-ditches-chinese-laundrymen/ )

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WaterBowlSlime@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why can't the British just do their own fuckin laundry?

[–] JK1348@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Shhhh don't tell them, I feel like they're gaslighting themselves

The sad part is that many of these colonial sympathizers will no doubt blame their own country for no longer having the privilege of polishing their colonial masters' boots.

[–] bleepingblorp@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Wow... this is such bluntfaced monocle and cane Colonialism...

bUt ThInGs ArE dIfFeReNt AnD bEtTeR nOw!!1!1!

First Sea Lord Admiral Lord West

Having two times "Lord" in their signature sounds like a bit about aristocratic decadency

[–] supersolid_snake@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I always thought bridge on the river kwai was satire in that it asked British military officers to actually do some labor.

[–] Comprehensive49@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 year ago

If your concern is about national security, why the heck are you hiring Nepalese Ghurkas who have never seen an ocean in their lives? Why can't the British do their own laundry themselves?

Is it that they have a fetish for foreign laundry servants, or that the working conditions of laundrymen on their ships are so poor that no full-blooded Brit would ever consider the job?

[–] DesiDebugger@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Do the royal navy soil their garments so hard they have to go the other side of the globe in order to find people who can be exploited enough to wash them?