this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
847 points (99.3% liked)

News

30307 readers
3675 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The home, which was run by an order of Catholic nuns and closed in 1961, was one of many such institutions that housed tens of thousands of orphans and unmarried pregnant women who were forced to give up their children throughout much of the 20th century.

In 2014, historian Catherine Corless tracked down death certificates for nearly 800 children who died at the home in Tuam between the 1920s and 1961 — but could only find a burial record for one child.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] javiwhite@feddit.uk 74 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Religion has historically provided a safe haven to the sick and twisted among society, where they're allowed to act with impunity due to their perceived status.

That's not directly due to the religion; but rather due to the societal pedestal being devout seems to put people on; "a holy person could never do that to a child" etc...

The reality is, other areas that benefit from this sort of status too find themselves riddled with bad actors... Just look through charity organisations and I can guarantee you'll be combing over a sea of sociopaths buying themselves good credit with public opinion rather than people looking to make a difference because they want to (not to say these people don't exist; they just don't end up running the show normally)

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

All inequality creates abuse.

Your last paragraph reminded me of Ashton Kutcher… I can’t watch that 70s show anymore. It was my favorite tv show of all time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] catty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

mental health nurses who work in an asylum/"hospital"/"mental health unit" too according to a friend who works in one as a nurse.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 231 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm old enough to remember everyone getting all bent out of shape by Sinead O'Connor ripping up a picture of the Pope.

She was a couple of years early, but right.

[–] ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org 71 points 1 day ago (13 children)

But she paid a huge price for being too early :(

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's worth mentioning that Joe Pesci did SNL the following week and said "I would have gave [sic] her such a smack. I would've grabbed her by her ... eyebrows." AFAIK he has never apologized for this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

She didn't really explain much at the time though, and when she did it never got a lot of publicity. People thought she was just attacking Catholics as a whole.

All most people saw was her ripping up a picture, going "fight the real enemy" and then a bunch of smear articles about her going mental.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 79 points 1 day ago (12 children)

To the "religion is what makes us civil" crowd, fuck off all the way to whatever hell you believe in or just the sun.

Disclaimer: This is not a call for violence.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Understood, I will go and punch a nun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every time I run into a pro lifer, I tell them about what happened in Ireland.

Most of them ignore me, some say it's worth it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 138 points 1 day ago (55 children)

Religion is fucked up.

Don’t trust any religious people.

They’re all sick in the head.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Religion is a social cancer. Sometimes it's benign and the host reabsorbs it. Other times it's spreads and kills living tissue

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (54 replies)
[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My dad recent got a decent payout for being the internationally trafficked childhood victim of one of these unwed mother homes…

Not worth his lifetime of trauma, nor the issues that came with being sold at age 4 to a “keeping up appearances” family that sent him away to boarding school on top of everything..

But it’s something.. he’s mid 70s, so you know, totally enough time to use the money.

[–] FirstCircle@lemmy.ml 88 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bon_Secours_Mother_and_Baby_Home .

The mothers were required to stay inside the home for one year, doing unpaid work for the nuns, as reimbursement for some of the services rendered. They were separated from their children, who remained separately in the home, raised by nuns, until they could be adopted – often without consent.

Some women who had had two confinements were sent directly to nearby Magdalene laundries after giving birth, as punishment for their perceived "recidivism". According to Professor Maria Luddy, "Such a stance, though not intended to be penal, allowed for the development of an attitude that accepted detention as a means of protecting society from these reoffending women.

Confinements. Punishment. Detention. Reoffending women.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (21 children)

Playing devil's advocate here, could it be that they ran something like a baby euthanasia outfit? like, no contraceptives back then, extreme social stigma surrounding birth out of wedlock, poverty forcing women to give up their newborns, giving them up to the nunnery, which had no resources to deal with feeding caring and raising thousands upon thousands of children, and so either A) simply took it upon themselves to take the logical step and cull some of them, or B) that a high number of babies died of natural causes (neglect, malnutrition, sudden infant death syndrome, disease, whatever) and they simply disposed of them.

I don't know what else could explain this, it's not like we're seriously talking about gangs of murderous baby killing nuns roaming the streets at night and snatching up babies by the hundreds for lust murders, right?

As far as I'm concerned, the only crime here is the institutionalized psychopathy of a religious patriarchal system that refused to take responsibility for giving people a legal and moral avenue to raise children that were brought into life in violation of religious law.

Makes more sense to me at least, I may be fuck way off wrong.

[–] wastelandpilot@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah to me it sounds like the babies died of such causes and weren't intentionally killed. I can imagine that trying to get rid of the bodies in other ways (burial, cremation, dumping elsewhere) would make the many deaths too visible or obvious, and would lead to questioning. But they could be hidden in the sewage.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel like maybe only people who have vaginas and can get pregnant should have a say in the whole abortion rights issue. So I'll step aside and just mention that my drainage system has zero bodies in it. So you know, like most normal people should probably have more voice than the Catholic church with rapist priests and 800 abortion bodies in their drain pipes. But yes, we should all be allowed to present evidence :).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (9 children)

How could these nuns think they would be admitted to heaven?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (3 children)

One of the selling features of Christianity is that you just need to ask Jesus forgiveness and it will be granted.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›