this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
98 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

2636 readers
7 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really don't understand why Intel's response to finally having a worthy competitor after market domination is just to absolutely crumble and hinder any potential return to form. It seems they had a good thing for a couple years with their last CEO, but they got rid of them right when the fruits of that labor started to show (chip work is usually a multi year long process, so results aren't regularly seen right away, is my understanding).

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because cannibalizing companies is the only thing capitalists know how to do to extract profit

[–] CAWright@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

I wonder who downvoted you. It's a true statement. Capitalists aren't there to make good products or services. They solely exist to squeeze as much money out of everything they can. They are a disease.

[–] CAWright@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

I guess my next system should be an AMD just because Intel may not be around for much longer to support.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

… and my sword?

America is gonna be so Great Again

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With autonomous vehicles entering the market, this seems like exactly the wrong time to exit the automotive market - unless their offerings totally sucked ass, I suppose.

Sure sucks for everyone over at Silicon Mobility.

[–] jasory@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Automotive chips are probably engine and transmission components, nothing special used by autonomous vehicles.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Sure, but my point is that AVs use even more of them.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everything in your car I'd an electronic module and has been for decades. Your window switch, power seat, radio, and on and on. They're all on their own proprietary network.

[–] ghostlychonk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not quite, they're all separate devices communicating through the CANbus instead of a central computer.

The N stands for network

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

I wonder how many of them are going to emigrate to China ans Europe.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google and Apple will be happy to add to their existing talent.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they just laid off a few thousand too.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

Google. laid of thousands. Apple laid off hundreds. Mostly from their car program that went nowhere and cost billions.