this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
1376 points (97.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

27172 readers
4273 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 196 points 1 year ago (72 children)

PSA: remember, if you see someone stealing essentials like groceries or whatever: no, you didn’t.

[–] dmmeyournudes@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Remember, if you see someone stealing groceries, they're not poor, poor people don't seal.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (70 replies)
[–] jiji@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m kinda surprised I’m seemingly in the minority of preferring self check. At least before they handicapped all the regular self checkouts and forced everyone to do self checkout. When it was truly optional, especially when it was “20 items of fewer” style, it was so much faster because I’m usually not buying a huge cart worth of items, and I can bag my own way. However now that Susan with her month’s worth of groceries for her family of 4 is also in self checkout, it makes it less efficient.

[–] Dempf@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Even when Susan is taking a huge cart through, a single queue for multiple service providers (self checkout) is always going to be theoretically more efficient than multiple queues - one per provider (one line for each cashier). The best of both worlds are places that have a single area to corral you into line, and a row of cashiers where you can go to the first available.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Everyone I go to the checkout, I get followed by the mall cop. I know it's just me because I don't see it happening with anyone else as it is too obvious. Thing is I would never think to steal anything. Never will. I know what I want to buy and I know if I have enough or not.

I think they follow me because I'm brown. Oh to have the privilege to roam around a store free and even deal in villany and mischievous behaviours.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a boring white guy. I'll steal something in your honor.

[–] fireduck@lem.trashbrain.org 13 points 1 year ago

Ha, yeah. I like it when I set off the alarms at stores and then ask, you want to look at my stuff? They just wave and say, naw, your good. Couldn't get caught if I tried.

[–] figaro@lemdro.id 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm a white guy with a big nose and a solid beard, and I get "random" TSA security checks just about every time I fly. It's almost as if there is a reason for all this

spoilerIts definitely racism

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Their own damn fault for trying to cut corners by eliminating cashier jobs

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It really should be 5% off if I have to scan my own crap. Especially the way CVS et al do it. Home Depot is the only one I don't care about because they just give you a wireless scanner and let you go to town, it's honestly faster that way and mutually beneficial.

[–] Dempf@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Yeah I really hate it when they give you self checkout but make everything function way way worse than what the cashier uses. I've never even considered shoplifting before but I've come pretty close on machines that refuse to scan because they're stuck on something 5 items ago when I'm moving quickly. Especially if it still beeps when I scan new items but refuses to actually scan it because it's hung up on something that it was slow to get the weight of -- really throws me off. It's not my job to baby your machine for you. I'm not getting paid for it. Just let me scan my shit and go.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hazzardis@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It’s become like a hobby of mine to not pay for a single item every time I check out at Walmart or Kroger. Fuckers have their margins higher than ever and their starting pay is $12-14/hr. If they want to reduce theft then they can hire people to actually work some of the 20 empty check out lanes they have.

[–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Don't do that, they keep track. When you go over $1k, you get fucked and picked up for a felony.

[–] tryptaminev@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (6 children)

That sounds absurd. There is easily 5000 regular shoppers in a grocery store. Plus people buying there irregularly. They would need to reliably identify every single one of them, with face recognition only having 80-90% accuracy. and If we talk 5$ missacounted per shoppinge once a week that is 4 years of shopping.

The amount of data needed to be stored and analysed for that is insane.

And then we are not even at the point, where they can prove theft on every single instance, because they need to prove that the system did not malfunction, or a simple user error occured.

I call bullshit on that.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Fish@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Are you being sarcastic? There is 1 person manning 10 checkouts and cameras that aren't monitored. As someone who worked in the Front End of a grocery store for many years, I can tell you that they don't have the resources to keep track of 99% of theft.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

It's a thing, but not for what everyone is talking about. Walmart LP in problem stores is intense and for serial shoplifters they will actually track... but it usually only takes two trips because they are stealing electronics or some shit. They aren't counting in ten dollar increments items skipped in the self checkout one trip at a time lol.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hazzardis@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m so far below $1k that it isn’t a worry, it’s only small dollar items. That and they aren’t catching me every time, even with all the cameras. Even if they did know every single time I “missed” an item at self check out, I’d be surprised if I’d taken more than $100 of food by now. That and they’d have a hard time proving it was intentional every time and not a simple mistake.

[–] Therevev@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

I was never trained to run their register, so mistakes are bound to happened.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Exatron@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really confused the person monitoring the self checkout on one occasion several years ago.

I paid with cash, and was supposed to get something like $2.17 back in change. The machine gave me the seventeen cents just fine, but instead of two dollar bills, I got a one and a ten.

It took a couple tries to get the worker to understand that the machine gave me too much back.

[–] Hextic@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If that was me I was trying to help you lol.

Next time just accept your Bank Error in your Favor card. Corpos ain't hurting lol

[–] Vampiric_Luma@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've had people try to slip me deals when an error occurs but I'm so genuinely in the moment I can't see it. Leads to awkward exchanges where they're trying to push free food on me and I'm just like "nah just a mistake bruh here ya go!"

And then facepalm 10 minutes later when the situation catches up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Solaris1789@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Fuck self checkout all my homies hate self checkout

[–] Skellybones@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (10 children)

People actually hate these things?

[–] hoodatninja@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] LwL@lemmy.fmhy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm confused too, self checkout is the best thing ever, no social interaction and pretty much equally fast, while allowing for more checkouts in the same amt of space. Though tbf only if done properly. One store here started having them like 10 years ago and there was like a 10% chance each item that you'd have to call over an employee bc the scale didn't work. Haven't had any problems with the ones i encountered recently.

[–] Tar_alcaran@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

All the self-checkouts in Dutch supermarkets have handheld barcode scanners you take into the store with you, and it's GREAT.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fhek@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Suck it Walmart.

[–] frippa@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Shameless self promotion but I host a shoplifting community over at lemmy.ml

link

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I always see self-checkout as outsourcing the cashier's job to a slow untrained amateur (the client) whilst doing away with paying for that work.

You need to be a sucker to choose to do work for the profiting of others without getting anything at all in return for it (at best, what you get is less slow checkout that the manned tills which they purposefully made worse than before in order to push you into self-checkout, which is not in fact better than what you had before, so not really a "benefit").

Even in the most purely amoral "greed is good" judgement, it doesn't make sense to do the work without at least getting a discount.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›