this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
405 points (99.0% liked)

News

30707 readers
3361 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 51 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

It absolutely eclipses the Gestapo.

The Heritage Foundation quite literally took the Nazi Germany history and said "we can do it better."

With 32,000 members, the Gestapo and adjacent effects was able to kill 21m people.

The Foundation wants 258,000,000 dead.

That $170b is going to that.

[–] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

That's $170B, not millions.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 3 points 13 hours ago

Ooops, I knew that too I'll correct it

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is some SS level shit. Or more accurately, Trump wants his own Rosgvardiya.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 13 hours ago

National Guard is separate from the Armed Forces.[3] It became a federal executive body in 2016 by a law signed by President Vladimir Putin.

I was not familiar with Rosgvardiya turns out it was founded in 2016. Wow.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

280,000,000 dead

Who exactly?

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

The Heritage Foundation members have stated a population around 100million would be healthy.

If 75% of Americans were culled (remember the number supposedly "saved") that ends up being near 100m or killing 258m.

65m Hispanic ancestry? 48m Black Americans? 6.5m South Asians? 5m Ethnic Chinese?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

Alright thanks.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 13 hours ago

I know Laura looked said 65 mil but maybe they just want the 1% left and use robots for labor.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 167 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

And here's a bit of a hint for the slow people out there - they don't need that many agents or that big of a budget if they're only dealing with immigrants.

[–] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 63 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Just sitting here quietly wondering what it would take to deport everyone who admitted to being a homosexual, black, Latino, or drug addict on a medical form…cause I assume that’s why DOGE wanted so much of our private information - to use it against us.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 15 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The leading edge of the Nazi thought machine is already saying it.

https://bsky.app/profile/elnorterecuerda.bsky.social/post/3lsyrlsj3wc2x

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 21 hours ago

At this point, all it would take would be to successfully establish the precedent that legal citizens can have their citizenship revoked (which just requires a case getting to the Supreme Court, where the corrupt majority has already demonstrated that they're going to just rubber-stamp whatever Trump wants), then to issue an executive order declaring that [whatever quality] is [whatever has been deemed to be acceptable grounds to have ones citizenship revoked]. It would undoubtedly be challenged, but again, it would wind up in front of the Supreme Court sooner or later, and they'd rubber-stamp it

[–] 100@fedia.io 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

and when those excuses for hunting people run out, who do you think they will focus next to keep getting funding?

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 19 hours ago

Whoever they deem "undesirables".

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 18 hours ago

easy to target every democratic and independant voter out there, most of them arnt raiding mostly blue more than red areas.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The goal is to go back to the slave system using some legal trickery and brute force. The money is there to make it happen.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Yes, though with a feudal system mixed in.

Corporations and wealthy individuals will be the sole property-owners and will play the roles of feudal lords, and the people will be serfs, allowed to live on the lords' estates only if they serve the lords.

Since homelessness will be criminalized while all property will be owned by the feudal lords, those who won't serve the lords "willingly" will be imprisoned, and yes, they will then be slaves.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

One of the various conservative thoughts is to make large swathes of US territory governed by corporations and billionaires. Basically, non-state zones subject to rules set by non-state systems.

Surprise! They're trying to make feudal / monarchy systems. Welcome to bring peasants again, fellow peasants.

The underlying foundation of conservative thoughts was, and is, to uphold a hierarchy that supports a monarchy. It has been from day 1. The American Revolution was a war against conservatism.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

I think one of the most concise ways to conceptualize the current conservative project is that they looked at the French Revolution and the collapse of the Ancien Regime and drew the wrong conclusions.

Rather than seeing it as the inevitable result of the systemstic oppression of the majority for the obscene privilege of a select few, they see it as a failure of the select few to sufficiently protect their privilege. And their goal is to recreate the conditions of the Ancien Regime, but this time around to prevent the peasants from successfully rebelling.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Weird how the conservative fear of "FEMA camps" was just them drooling about using them to put anyone that looks too brown in.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2 points 18 hours ago

It'll be different depending on the skin color. The darker the skin, the shorter the road to slavery and skipping the feudal system.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

But then where would they hide extra money to syphon later in corrupt dealings??? C'mon man! Think like a republican!

[–] RedSeries@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If I remember something I read earlier, they would be better funded than the Russian military. This is insane.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The russian military literally told their soldiers to show up for war, bringing their own weapons, food, clothes, and tools.

Thats not exactly a great bar to measure funding with....

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 5 points 20 hours ago

They do have tanks, airplanes, and artillery though.

[–] jhoff90@lemmy.world 37 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Money to fund gestapo US Border Patrol and ICE-IS but not enough for health care for our elderly, education for our youth, or nutrition and housing assistance for our vets.

This government is morally bankrupt. Error Code: 404

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

Don't worry, there's plenty of money to fund israeli healthcare as well as their genocide.

[–] Numinous_Ylem@lemmy.world 40 points 23 hours ago

Wake up babe, new Sturmabteilung just dropped.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 17 points 21 hours ago

Largest and most expensive are two different things, most expensive could lead to largest, but I guarantee you the plan for spending that money is the size and shape of a napkin and includes a big funnel to the military and prison industrial complexs and with a sketch of some stick figures in suits throwing piles of cash at each other while laughing.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 10 points 19 hours ago

would

*will

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 22 points 23 hours ago

I guess it's a poor situation.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago

Oh, look...

That private army Mafia Don Mangolini's always wanted is coming to pass.

Able to do "Daddy's" (🤮) bidding without restraint or consequence.

FFS.

🤡 🖕 🖕 💩

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

the single largest federal law enforcement agency in the history of the nation

Are all those qualifiers even needed?

Are there any state or local agencies larger than the federal government’s? Are there any other countries with larger agencies? (China or India, maybe?)

Or can we just call it “the largest law enforcement agency in (western) history”?

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Wait it passed? The democrats didn't do anything to stop fascism? Who could have seen this coming?

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

It helps when they are not the minority… with a 10% margin

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago

They have the filibuster. The thing they refused to get rid of to allow them to do good things.