this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
738 points (84.7% liked)

Memes

45637 readers
1806 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
738
eat the rich (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ThunderChunk@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

It's a meme

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] outer_spec@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s it? That’s the meme? That’s just a piece of toast with the words “The workers should seize the means of production” written on in it.

[–] Rambi@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (17 children)

That's not toast? It's bread.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There’s a meme of a frog puppet drinking tea, and a meme of a pootoo, and a meme of some beans. It can be literally anything.

[–] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

yeah you call it a meme and put it on the meme community but I don't see a meme here

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look there, Zach, a message on the toast!

And in the coffee? Revolution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (26 children)

How exactly? Other than excessive bloodshed, which - other than edgelord tankies - most people would neither want, nor have the stomach to pursue.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Take the route California is taking and educate the kids about worker's rights. Teach them it's not okay to be exploited at the work place and encourage them to tell their parents about it. Civics classes should also be taught to learn how the government works and what people's rights are under the Constitution. Encourage people to unionize now that they know how the system works.

Once the basics have been taught, elect people who care about government reform for social policies by paying for them with higher corporate and personal wealth taxes. Reform the tax system the wealthy have been using to hide their money. All their money is tied up in stocks and they're living off of multimillion dollar loans? Fuck them, tax a big percentage of the loan. All these things can be done to indirectly seize the fruits of their production at least.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

General strike (like the writers guild, except everyone) until the distribution of (a part of the) dividends to the workers is enshrined into law.

Sounds pretty doable to me.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Start by talking about your wages. Most people won't even do that, for fear of reprisals. Even though it's protected federally.

Casually bringing up support for unions, and those on strike.

This is base level, and in many places, will take a long time to see movement.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i'd do some intellectual property reform.
some banking reform - more local / peer group/long term lending requirements, less fickle international finance. (and less fucking mortgage bubbles!)
some small business support / starter initiatives - link that in with how banks work.

i'd consider lobbying for some government sposored work to generate open source plans and enable production processes for useful tools - Okay that isn't going to happen , , ,

but it's not all or nothing, but you can do things to help some more workers control and access more of their tooling even if its not outright ownership of the end to end production process.

(By the way i'm basically arguing for a more "free" market in the ecnomic sense (easy access for a large number of small scale producers). . . which is exactly not what large-scale capitalists want.
They want a market "free" from any thing that might regulate their attempts to secure economic power and their abiity to use it to generate supernormal prices/profits.)

Progress doesnt happen in 4-5 year political cycles thats a hard one to improve without an electorate capable (any maybe secure enough) to thing about the longer term. Odd that it was extreme econmic and political uncertainty that brought out the likes of FDR and other post-war that people were most willing to think long term when it came to their governemnts - I guess it brought out all sorts of "crazies".

The big one in terms of bloodshed is land reform - and it has been done in a few places - sort of post-colonial type situations - but granted it does ususally have blooodshed. It's a personal judgment what degree is "excessive bloodshed".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LavaPlanet@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The women of Iceland went on strike in 1975, they stopped doing literally everything, walked out of the home, left the kids, to demonstrate how much the system would crumble without them, how important they are to everything being able to function, and ask for equal pay. They flipped everything overnight.

The current system is all the workers do all the work, and the profits from that work go almost entirely to some douvhe who won birth lotto. The system is already rigged. Unrigging the system would look like walking off the job, but globally. It's going to happen. Society is squeezed too tightly, there's going to be havoc.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Agreed, lets just keep doing whatever the capitalists demand until their insatiable greed destroys them and us.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kxdxa/1500-scientists-warn-society-could-collapse-this-century-in-dire-climate-report

It's not like it's gonna take that long. And if not climate change, the AI they don't fully understand but are trying to monetize. And if not AI, CRISPR derived vectors they don't fully understand but are trying to monetize, etc.

Lets just stay the course. It will all work out in the end, at least for the planet, and that's ultimately what matters.

[–] TheBeege@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I understand the bitterness, but whoever said the commenter wanted to do what capitalists demand? They just wanted to avoid bloodshed.

There are always options like general strikes, massive voting movements, etc. It's just a matter of figuring out what will work and how to do it.

If you're arguing that capitalists will respond with violence, that's fair, but then the blame is on them, not the workers

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That isn't what I said and I think you know it. Next time just say you don't know the answer either and save yourself the effort.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Devouring@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're allowed to post political memes as long as the mods agree with your view.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Same as everywhere, really.

[–] Glytch@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago

Seems economic to me.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 year ago

I made a bunch of Dalle pics on this topic last night:

[–] jack@monero.town 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

What does that even mean? Give us some practical advice

[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Make your own bread I guess.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If there was hope, it must lie in the proles, because only there, in those swarming disregarded masses, eighty-five percent of the population of Oceania, could the force to destroy the Party ever be generated. The Party could not be overthrown from within. Its enemies, if it had any enemies, had no way of coming together or even of identifying one another. Even if the legendary Brotherhood existed, as just possibly it might, it was inconceivable that its members could ever assemble in larger numbers than twos and threes. Rebellion meant a look in the eyes, an inflection of the voice; at the most, an occasional whispered word. But the proles, if only they could somehow become conscious of their own strength, would have no need to conspire. They need only to rise up and shake themselves like a horse shaking off flies. If they chose they could blow the Party to pieces tomorrow morning. Surely sooner or later it must occur to them to do it.

load more comments
view more: next ›