submitted 1 year ago by Harry_h0udini@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/foss@beehaw.org

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Skelectus@suppo.fi 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not foss, unless they've changed the 'temporary licence' yet.

E: It is an awesome project and I really hope it takes off, but this isn't the best place to post it.

[-] Harry_h0udini@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

It's free and the code is available for inspection.

[-] cacheson@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're posting to /c/foss, not /c/freeofchargeandthecodeisavailableforinspection.

[-] Skelectus@suppo.fi 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People with different definitions were constantly bickering on whether it qualifies as open source. It might as well for all I care.

But it's not free and open source with that restrictive license. The word free doesn't refer to the price tag.

[-] tracteurblinde@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023

7 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17911 readers

72 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS