this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
679 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

15786 readers
3405 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 1 day ago

Top left thing: "I bring you love!"

Lenny: "It's bringing love! Break its legs!"

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is this also how some animals see them?

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 87 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Yee. I saved this image for a Caption this.

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago

"Bird Vision activate!"

Walks straight into glass door

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That's great! Any guesses what the bottom bars are about on either side of the 'heart thing'?

[–] Techranger@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

Saddam Hussein in UV light.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

It’s very unclear/nonsensical

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I spent like twenty minutes looking. I'm stumped!

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cone count is my guess. Of the photoreceptors in the eye - Rods see in low-light and cones see in color. Some animals lack or have different cones compared to humans. Hence why bees can see "bee purple"

It seems to be a commonly used image stolen from Klaus Schmidt https://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/search/label/bird%20vision but strangely none seem to have the lower bit. How odd...

[–] StellarExtract@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago

Technically no, this photographer is putting flowers under a blacklight and photographing them, resulting in a picture of basically what a human would see IRL in that scenario (aside from things like contrast/exposure variances, etc). It's not really the same as what UV sensing animals would see. These photos are of regions of the flower converting UV light into human-visible visible light (via fluorescence, same thing as a blacklight poster). UV sensing animals are seeing actual ultraviolet being reflected by the flower as well as visible light, so it's not the same thing.

[–] woodenghost@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Ultraviolet induced visible fluorescence photography

Sounds complicated, but it's just shining UV light on an object in a dark room and taking a normal photo with long exposure. If you want to be pure about only picturing visible light, you might need a UV filter, since many cameras can already see a bit of UV despite inbuilt filters.

How to DIY.

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Flowers? Banal. Boring. Do hotdog!

[–] GargleBlaster@feddit.org 14 points 2 days ago

Hotdog? Banal. Boring. Do a kickflip

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Was wondering why this sounded familiar, saw the article was from 7 years ago (2018) and now I understand, lol.

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What if the subjectisn't a flower? Skin cancer?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It’s just a normal “black light” like at a dance party, or mini golf course, or like the little flashlights they use to check money and ID cards.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Depends on the wavelength. Could be skin cancer, vitamin D, nothing, or your manicure is done

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I need to get a UV filter for my camera...

[–] lemmur@szmer.info 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You don't need a filter. You need a source of UV light. Plants shine in visible spectrum after being treated with UV. It doesn't last long tho.

I got a full spectrum converted nex6 in April so I've been looking around at filters

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Isn't the sun a source of UV light?

[–] lemmur@szmer.info 1 points 1 day ago
[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, but the visible light will overpower the glow.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I need to get UV cone surgery for my eyes. I want to be able to see these colors naturally, not have them fluoresce into a spectrum of colors I already can see.

[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is just remarkable. Augmented glasses that can process this spectrum IRL when? So cool the things just beneath it all

[–] juliebean@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

just get yourself a UV flashlight, or bring some flowers to your nearest laser tag arena. this is just how stuff looks under blacklight sometimes (which isn't to say it isn't cool, just that you don't need fancy tech to see it),