KDE

5313 readers

59 users here now

KDE is an international technology team creating user-friendly free and open source software for desktop and portable computing. KDE’s software runs on GNU/Linux, BSD and other operating systems, including Windows.

Plasma 6 Bugs

If you encounter a bug, proceed to https://bugs.kde.org/, check whether it has been reported.

If it hasn't, report it yourself.

PLEASE THINK CAREFULLY BEFORE POSTING HERE.

Developers do not look for reports on social media, so they will not see it and all it does is clutter up the feed.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

carlschwan@lemmy.kde.social

Bro666@lemmy.kde.social

Aniqakhokhar@lemmy.kde.social

herzenschein@pawb.social

Wayland: Font is blurry with fractional scaling (lemmy.kde.social)

submitted 1 year ago by penquin@lemmy.kde.social to c/kde@lemmy.kde.social

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is now the only thing standing between me and using Wayland as my daily driver. I have an all AMD PC running on two 27" 4k monitors. Setting them up to 200% is good, but too big. Setting them to 175% causes the font to be blurry. Not too blurry, but I can tell and it's not comfortable to look at for too long. Also, other UI elements are blurry, too regardless of the scaling. Although those elements aren't defaults, but still blurry and look out of place. For example, the oxygen window decoration buttons are very blurry. Hovering over those buttons shows a big blurry and empty box.

Anywho, I'm pretty sure the whole KDE team is aware of this, but my question is, is this being addressed in plasma 6? This is literally the only thing holding me back from Wayland. I love how snappy it is. Things are way quicker than x11. I want to use it. Thank you

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Zamundaaa@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, that should be fixed in Plasma 6 - at least for Qt apps. For other apps it depends on the toolkit to have support for fractional scaling

[–] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you so much.

[+] bruhsus@lemmynsfw.com -8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A 27" display is gigantic for 4K at computer monitor distance, the pixels are going to be as big as Christmas hams. Just set it to 100% where it's supposed to be and maybe invest in a pair of peepers if that's somehow not easy for you to see. Users under 90 should be fine, though.

[–] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That makes absolutely no sense and you should have kept it to yourself.

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I have a 32” 4k monitor and its amazing, can recommend.

[–] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 1 year ago

I like the 27" size. They're both 60 hz unfortunately :/ I'm thinking of either one of those really long monitors or two with high refresh rate. I need at least 90 hz. I freaking love 4k and can never have anything else.