46
submitted 1 year ago by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

London is building a new road tunnel under the Thames, in an area that already suffers from very poor air quality, in a city that widely supports reducing amounts of traffic. After much complaining from locals, a plan to accommodate cyclists in the (currently under construction) tunnel has been unveiled, and the idea is to use a shuttle bus 🤦

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jocanib@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Absolute bullshit. Hang around for a bus, which you may or may not be charged for, because all the money is being spent on enabling more cars.

TfL said the shuttle bus was the best option as services could be tailored to “uncertain demand” to ensure value for money.

Translation: we'll make the bus too infrequent to be of any use to anyone, then cite the lack of demand as a reason to cut the service further.

[-] lemmy@acqrs.co.uk 7 points 1 year ago

I have such high hopes for London, their cycling infrastructure has been getting better I er the years, but then I go to Paris and just cry at what is possible

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

"Pedestrians would not be able to use the bike bus but would be able to board conventional buses"

This seems like extra steps for no reason.

Sure, 20 busses per hour peak, so a ride every 3 minutes. But a cyclist can only use a bike bus and a pedestrian only a conventional bus. You you've immediately reduced service standards to 6 minutes....

[-] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

I was super excited when I read the title. Then I opened the article.

What they're proposing is just a bus. A "bike bus" is something else entirely and what I was initially excited about.

[-] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 8 points 1 year ago

TfL said the bike bus was under consideration because it would be “unsafe” to allow cyclists to ride through the £2bn tunnel

Dunno, seems like it would just make more sense to ban cars from using the tunnel

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Or just design a crossing that actually serves the community it is in.

[-] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

Is there anything wrong with this crossing other than that it allows cars?

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Do you need any more that what I covered in the OP?

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
46 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9675 readers
84 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS