445
submitted 10 months ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 78 points 10 months ago

What, he gets more cookies for violating it now?

FFS try not to get sucked into the clown vortex judge. You’re going to have to either admit your courtroom is a joke or throw the rapist in jail. Ok? Shields up.

[-] hogunner@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I doubt his attorneys care all that much; the only attorneys still taking Trump on as a client are either those that have drunk the crazy Kool-Aid or those that want to be a talking head on one of MAGA networks…or both.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Out of curiosity I decided to look it up.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/16/us/politics/trump-lawyers-fees.html

The last few attorneys have been paid ahead of time, and paid a lot of money.

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

He's down to the lawyers with the smoothest of brains

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

ITT: No one read the article and thinks it means tRump can't go after the prosecutors, rather than the reality of tRump's attorneys now being gagged about talking about Engoron's staff

[-] theostermanweekend@lemmy.ml 35 points 10 months ago

This guy. If anyone of us filled that, we'd be locked so fast. But, no....this wad gets to carry on like some jackass. When will he be gone from our lives?

[-] Psythik@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago

I have a feeling that we're going to have to wait for natural causes cause I have very little faith in actual justice being served.

[-] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 months ago

Hopefully the stress of the trials accelerates this

[-] pzyko@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

I concur, if only for the reason that the US won’t dare set the precedent of sending a former president to prison.

[-] ModsAreCopsACAB@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

There is a difference though, putting an ex-president in jail would create such a political shitstorm that it just wouldn't be worth it.

Meanwhile, put any or all of us in jail, no one would care 😂.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

this is exactly what was being said years ago regarding the russian collusion investigation, but every time i see someone saying it on here it gets downvoted. reddit and lemmy are fake intellectual shitholes. the toxic optimism here is worse than stupidity.

putting an ex-president in jail would be complicated. the guy has state secrets and a lifetime secret service escort. im sure it could be done, but at most it wouldn't be a normal jail sentence.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 4 points 10 months ago

Then the system inherently creates and needs different classes of people to function, meaning it cannot guarantee equality under the law and therefore is illegitimate.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

you may be onto something here

[-] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

After sentencing sometime in April or maybe May after the Federal trial finishes for the obstruction charges. After that, the rest of the crew gets federal charges to piggyback Georgia indictments. He'll then die in prison shortly afterward and his insane followers will scream that he was murdered and commit terrorist acts for decades.

Oh, to answer your question, not until we're all long dead.

[-] youngGoku@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Lol like that's gonna stop him. He's a narcissist with no sense of authority.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I would bet that if the gag order would be conditional on his release (I.e. he would have to be jailed until trial) he would find a lot of self control.

He is doing it, because he knows he can get away with it.

[-] youngGoku@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Maybe I'm wrong, I don't think he would be able to even if the writing on the wall says "jail' and I think that's why the judge isn't doing that.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 25 points 10 months ago

Is an order to literally gag Trump out of the question?

[-] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The way he horks down McD meatfood™, I'm not sure it's possible to plug that suckhole forever. Prove me wrong? 🍿🙏🏼

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Some would say it’s a basket of deplorables.

[-] snownyte@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Judge, this is a guy that has brushed off not one but two official impeachments while in office. Do you think this fat orange clown is going to care about gag orders? The only reason he gets by was, when in office, he had political cronies protecting him. Out of office, he's only got all of the dumbest MAGAtards that he proudly grifted to protect him.

This is a modern day OJ Simpson trial, without the murdering aspect. Just a clownshow.

[-] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

He might not care about gag orders, but he may care about prison sentences against him.

[-] WagesOf@artemis.camp 1 points 10 months ago

Even a guilty plea is going to go to appeal and he'll be safe from prison for the next 10 years. I'd be shocked if he survives that long.

[-] uid0gid0@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You can't appeal a guilty plea. You can appeal the resulting sentence but you lawyer has to prove it was more than was allowed by the law.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago

The latest ep of the podcast What Roman Mars Can Learn About Con-Law was about the gag orders. Interesting stuff.

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
445 points (99.1% liked)

politics

18888 readers
3802 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS