238

Apple Argued Safari Is Three Different Browsers to Avoid Regulation (www.macrumors.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Apple Argued Safari Is Three Different Browsers to Avoid Regulation::Apple recently claimed that Safari is three different browsers in effort to avoid regulation in the European Union (via The Register). The claim...

all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Wootz@lemmy.world 134 points 10 months ago

"The European Commission went on to point out that Safari's functionality and underlying technologies are near-identical across platforms. The Commission even highlights Apple's own marketing materials for its Continuity feature, which appear to contradict the company's claims, touting the tag line "Same Safari. Different device." As a result, the Commission rejected Apple's claim and insists that "Safari qualifies as a single web browser, irrespective of the device through which that service is accessed.""

Chef's Kiss

Governments and stately instances so rarely have a proper grasp of technology. This is beautiful.

[-] sfgifz@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago

On example cited by Apple is Safari's sidebar feature on iPadOS and macOS, allowing users to see opened tabs, tab groups, bookmarks, and browsing history. Since this feature is unavailable in the version of Safari for iOS, Apple claimed that it is a distinctly different browser.

😂

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 10 months ago

So they're also claiming iOS on an iPhone and iOS on an iPad are separate products? In for a penny, in for a pound, I guess.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

They did rename it to iPad OS, so yes

[-] TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id 3 points 10 months ago

Wow, then even chrome can claim that they don't support Extension ok Mobile thus it's different product. Big Brain Time from apple.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago

Safari
Safari Pro
Safari Pro Max

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

Apple claimed repairing your Mac with 3rd party parts turns it into a PC so you can't resell it as a Mac.

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ah, there's where all the creativity went to.

[-] remer@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Apple needs to allow non-webkit browsers on iOS.

[-] The_Cunt_of_Monte_Cristo@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

So iOS can be full of Chromium based browsers.

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 10 months ago

let's be honest, most people will still use safari. Just let people use Firefox, damn it

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Of course they did. Microsoft tried this in the 90's with Internet Explorer, Outlook, and Explorer. Sure, it does three different things, but it's the SAME THING.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 17 points 10 months ago

Those are actually different things and always have been. I don't know what point you think you're making.

[-] privatizetwiddle@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

I think the reference was to IE4 for Windows 95 and 98, which did in fact run the desktop and file manager functions with IE to enable web functionality. You could type a URL into the file manager path bar and use it as a web browser or use a web page as your desktop, IIRC.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer_4

[-] acow@programming.dev 11 points 10 months ago

“Are you getting it? These are three separate browsers.” - Anonymous

[-] danielfgom@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

So much for "we care about your privacy"

We all know that was BS but the isheep sadly believe it.

[-] nix@merv.news 16 points 10 months ago

What does this have to do with privacy

[-] danielfgom@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

They are trying to avoid regulation. That's super dodgy. They are trying to hide something. Since it's related to a browser, data collection must be what they want to regulate, and what Apple is trying to hide....

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You’re overthinking it.

Having 25% of the mobile browser market, and being more than half of the US mobile browser market means:

Apple can force companies like Google to pay tens of billions a year to be the default search engine.
Apple can force companies to ensure that their products are built and QA’ed with Apple’s platforms in mind. This was something Apple struggled with before the iPhone. Many Mac users will remember the days when certain websites and platforms simply didn’t work unless you were using IE for Windows.

It’s a play for partnership cash and, because Apple has always been a control freak, insurance that experiences on their platforms are right.

Edit: One more massive thing, but I can’t believe I forgot. Apples hold over the browser market means they can strong arm the industry into adopting Web standards that Apple wants.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 10 months ago

I'm a big fan of Apple's products, but this is some serious bullshit. Fuck off.

[-] wanderingWhale@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Apple bullshittery again

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023

238 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

58144 readers

4511 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS