163
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] teft@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

We should have a national system like how the army uses. There are heat categories and depending on what the heat & humidity are tells you how long you can work for and how long your rest period is. It also tells you how much water you should be consuming for each level of heat. This system kept us safe in Iraq in 130 degree heat so I don't see why we couldn't implement it.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

this. we spent money to determine these levels to and like the internet this should benefit everyone. Heck I don't know what the levels are and I should as I should follow them if Im doing a weekend project.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

heck that is useful even if taking a walk in hot weather. thanks.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

I find this to be a big problem.

There is plenty of evidence saying that working outdoors at specific temperatures and humidity is extremely harmful and dangerous, but no legal obligation for employers to provide more rest/water breaks and shade the hotter it gets.

[-] TheDubz87@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

We have a construction crew next door everyday building a new warehouse and I'm happy to see that they call it quits on days the temp spikes up past 100. There is zero shade around here mid day, and they're basically working out in the middle of a huge concrete slab currently. Most of the time they start early and end early with the exception of a few guys hanging around to unload flatbed with incoming materials. Very rare, but it seems a few firms out there do care about their employees well being.

[-] SlovenianSocket@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

We do this as well. Left site at 12:30 yesterday as it was starting to get too hot in the building

[-] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The next 15 years are gonna be sick

[-] Pilkins@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is something I'm wanting to bring up in our next union negotiations. Anyone working in the heat needs this ironed out before the next few years, as summers just keep getting worse. It's ridiculous there aren't laws for this yet.

[-] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Well I suppose it's time to make them then. Our lawmakers are too busy making laws no one asked for and ruining the world, making it a worser place.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

once we do get it passed we can bask in the few months of reprieve before the courts strike it down as overreach.

[-] 567PrimeMover@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

In another lifetime I worked for an MSP that would perform network services for local industries. One of our customers, a lumber processing plant, needed ethernet drops for some fancy new controllers for their kilns. I count that job as one of the worst experiences in my career due to the heat alone. It was the middle of July, pulling 12 hour days next to giant furnaces in tin shacks. I probably lost 30 pounds in sweat alone on that job. I could wring out my shirt and jeans at the end of each day. It was absolute misery. I have no idea how the guys who actually worked there each day could do it

Heat is no joke, and I find it appalling that we have nothing in place to protect people from it

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
163 points (98.2% liked)

News

22882 readers
3771 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS