this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
192 points (97.5% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sneaky_b45tard@feddit.de 85 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Is there a country in the EU where the far right isn't on the rise? I need a Backup plan in case the nazis are voted in Germany again

[–] letmesleep@feddit.de 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Denmark. You may not like how Frederiksen did it - she essentially opted for politics that are as anti-immigrant as legally possible - but she also obliterated the far right there. The two far-right parties in Folketing now total 10 of 179 seats..

And the difference between Frederiksen's social democrats and the actual far right is huge. No climate change denying, no cozying up to Russia, no anti-lgbtq nonsense, no anti-EU propaganda and so on.

[–] Grippler@feddit.dk 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah we have tax rebates for the rich, defunding of education, some laughably passive bordering nonexistent policies to protect local environment and combat climate change (heavily lobbied for by the agricultural lobby)....shit is going just A-OK here 👌

[–] letmesleep@feddit.de 9 points 11 months ago

shit is going just A-OK here 👌

Well, the baseline is the rest of the planet, so unironically: yes. I mean, take the climate change portion for instance: Every single country on the planet is doing worse than Denmark. .

I also think your pig farming is silly and detrimental to the environment afaik the only reason you're not in a recession is fat people in America, but still, the numbers on pretty much everything make Denmark look pretty good. Or the rest of the world very shitty.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"Anti-immigrant" but welcoming people from select countries. Reminds me of how a Swedish person told me he thought there were too many immigrants but that I, a Canadian, would be perfectly welcome to go there.

Apparently some people are considered immigrants and that's bad, while others are just expats looking for a new home.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's cultural and religious differences that irritate people moreso, I find.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] letmesleep@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago

Apparently some people are considered immigrants and that’s bad, while others are just expats looking for a new home.

I don't think they're considered expats if they plan to stay indefinitely. But yeah, there's vastly different sentiments towards different types of immigrants. Usually the surveys ask for "European immigration", but I guess a Canadian would fall into that as well, so they might just as well ask about Western immigration (the use European because of EU freedom of movement). In part sentiments obviously have a lot to do with racism and xenophobia, but it's unfortunately not just that. The statistics for people who immigrated irregularly (i.e. without a visa) really don't look good. E.g. here in Germany in 2022 foreign nationals made up some 16% of the population but 32% of crime suspects (excluding crimes around migration which Germans can't commit). The percentages regarding people who actually get convicted are even worse and "Zugewanderte" (recent immigrants, mainly asylum seekers) used to have even worse numbers as well (before the refugees from Ukraine, largely women and children came).

Obviously there's demographic and socioeconomic reasons for that discrepancy. The main issue is that there's a lot of young men among immigrants and you men tend to commit most crimes, but that obviously doesn't undo any of these crimes. Ukraine's rather sexist border controls (they don't allow men aged 18-60 to leave) really did their diaspora a solid here.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oof, later in the day from when you commented that, there was a far right riot 😬

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Portugal? IIRC they’ve been quite resistant to right-wing populism.

[–] cjk@feddit.de 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Portugal's Chega party increased to 7,2 % in 2022. That's lower than in the rest of the EU, but still an increase by eleven seats.

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I stand corrected. And somewhat dejected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sv1sjp@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Switzerland is a well tested option

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 36 points 11 months ago (1 children)

SVP currently holds 25% of the seats in the federal council of Switzerland. Not exactly what I'd call Nazi-free.

[–] cjk@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago

Worse still, they are at 27%. And they have been in this area for quite a long time, so the proportion is somewhat stable.

[–] trollercoaster@feddit.de 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The last time the Nazis were in power in Germany, Switzerland closed its borders to most people trying to flee, so maybe a well tested, but still not so good option...

[–] sergih@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago

spain's fsr right wing party went down from 15% to 12% in the last elections.

[–] runwaylights@lemmy.world 75 points 11 months ago (13 children)

This one hurt. The fight for the EU, the climate, diversity and the democracy just became harder.

[–] Vincent@kbin.social 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, that's not set in stone yet. If he doesn't manage to form a coalition (and it's very much in the realm of possibilities that he won't be able to), the GreenLeft-Labour Party is next in line. In which case a GL-PvdA/VVD/NSC/D66 coalition (parties #2-#5) is not unlikely. Which I'm guessing would have to make some concessions when it comes to migration, but would probably be OK-ish news for the EU, the climate, and democracy and rule of law.

[–] runwaylights@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but it's the amount of support he got that scares me. There's a lot of support for the right wing in the Netherlands. That means that either a lot of people support those views or are willing to put up with these xenophobic zealots just to make a statement.

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, the Netherlands is really two different countries when you separate the big cities from the countryside.

[–] taladar@feddit.de 16 points 11 months ago

That is true for almost every country (with the main exceptions not having one or the other at all).

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemm.ee 38 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Calm down. While he got the biggest share, it is "just" 35 seats in a 150 seats parliament. He would need another 41 seats in coalition to get anywhere, which means (as his share is the largest) he would not only need one, but at least two partners willing to form a coalition with and a government under him.

While those 35 seats are still 35 seats too many, I doubt he will run the country.

[–] weeahnn@lemmy.world 61 points 11 months ago (27 children)

I really, really hate this kind of thinking.

Election in 2008: "Calm down, the far right only got 3%" Election in 2012: "Calm down, the far right only got 7%" Election in 2016: "Calm down, the far right only got 13%" Election in 2020: "Calm down, the far right only got 18%" And so on...

Can you people really not see a problem with this?

[–] Maestro@kbin.social 25 points 11 months ago (12 children)

It's the intolerance paradox in full view. Wilders should have been convicted and jailed years ago. A tolerant society must be fiercly intolerant towards intolerance.

[–] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago

Not sure if jailing him is the right solution, but after his Moroccan speech, he should at the very least have been barred from public office, as well as participating in any political parties.

At least that way, there is a strong deterrent to preventing politicians from spewing this kind of hate.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Crazazy@feddit.nl 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Right now people are theorizing 2 possible coalitions, the first one is PVV - NSC - VVD and the other one is GLPVDA - NSC - VVD - D66. This means we're either getting a far-right populist as the prime minister or we are getting a coalition that will get us absolutely nowhere and will change nothing from the status quo, while also likely destroying leftist support even more because of how little to coalition will be capable of vs. what the leftist party (GLPVDA) promised

We're not doing okay

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 13 points 11 months ago

it is “just” 35 seats

The article says that the projection has now risen to 37.

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 31 points 11 months ago (4 children)

As a Dutchman, I'm kind of shocked. The battle seemed to be between the previous largest party VVD, the new NSC party and the labour/greens fusion. Then the PVV suddenly surged. Apparently a lot of people who weren't sure yet ended up going with the PVV. Out of the 4 largest parties we have 3 that are right-wing and/or conservative. The PVV is far-right (though hard to place), the VVD is a neoliberal party, and the NSC is closer to the centre but also quite conservative. We're entering dark days...

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (5 children)

The leader of the labour/green did a very bad campaign. I voted for him out of conviction, but I can totally see undecided voters not being convinced by his campaign. The loss of the VVD can be explained partly by the punishment that ruling parties get in elections in these times. I'm just hoping the leader of the NSC doesn't agree to be in a coalition with PVV. Best thing we can hope for now is a center-right coalition with the Labour/Greens, the VVD (neo-liberals) and NSC (center-right) :(

[–] Pea666@feddit.nl 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What shocks me is that unconvinced voters thought his idiotic anti-Islam position wasn’t a reason not to vote for him.

They’ve know that’s what he stands for the past 17 years. Sure, he said it’s ’negotiable’ if it helps him get into government sometime during the campaign but now that he’s the biggest he’s gonna make a stand on that once more.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Everyone here would do well to read the room a bit if we find that surprising. Or at least keep tabs on whats going on outside of your particular ideological bubble.

Anti immigrant sentiment is up big time across the EU right now. And specifically directed towards people from the Middle East and Africa. I'd wager a lot of people didn't vote for him despite his stances on that issue, but rather because of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hubi@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What would you say the chances are of Wilders being able to form a coalition?

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 12 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Before the election I would have said unlikely, because both NSC and VVD ruled out a coalition with PVV. Afterwards the NSC already caved to "respect the choice of the voters" and the VVD also did not make a clear statement.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

I can't do this anymore, fuck.

[–] Jyrdano@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Anyone who thinks this shocking needs to leave their social bubble.

The European liberal left is in losing battle for their voters and their solution is pretending that nothing’s happening.

[–] federalreverse@feddit.de 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't think that they're pretending that. However, the issue is that right-wing and right-of-center parties carelessly throw around lies and half-truths that match the way people tend to be thinking anyway.

It also doesn't matter to them that they create rather than solve issues, as long as their narrative is stable. A very recent example: Conservatives normally claim that they are in favor of having a strong and growing economy. However, German conservatives just deliberately worsened the economic outlook of the entire country by suing against the 2021 state budget. To do so, they weaponized an overly aggressive debt ceiling they themselves[1] put into place in 2009 and which they themselves ignored for most of the years between 2009-2021.

[1] Along with the Social Democrats who unfortunately have been moving further to the right for at least the last 20 years. Since Conservatives, Free Liberals and Social Democrats all voted for this debt ceiling rule at the time, it's now part of the constitution. Abolishing that rule is now an impossibility, as the coalition would need support from a large number of Conservatives to do so.

[–] MamLaLiq@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GyozaPower@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Welp, there goes my willingness to move to the Netherlands.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] S_204@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Seems like Europe is turning against the Muslim community.

As a Canadian I'm curious why this is happening and what people think could be done to make for a more welcoming transition. We also accepted quite a few middle eastern refugees over the past few years and I'm wondering if there are lessons to be learned.

[–] urquell@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

General problems being projected on foreigners, turning into racism.

[–] omnissiah@iusearchlinux.fyi 8 points 11 months ago (4 children)

General problems are parents integrate well, children clamp on their parents identity and prefer that over the identity of their place of residence. And if you look at the statistics it's not projected, it's true (math doesn't lie)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] federalreverse@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Canada is extremely picky when it comes to refugees. And it has the choice to be picky, because crossing the sea from the Mid-East/North Africa to Canada is hard. Even refugees from South America need to travel through the US first. So in the end, Canada gets people who are relatively well-off and well-educated and who pose fewer problems integrating.

Europe on the other hand is the natural route for Mid-East/North African refugees which due to the geographical closeness is available to a lot more people, including some from social segments below the middle class of their original country. And since the people coming to the EU tend to integrate worse, need more education and social services, there's a tremendous opening for right-wing parties to swoop in and make claims. The EU also really needs to work on integration of new arrivals, even a country that pretends to be fairly open like Germany is partly really steeped in outmoded, hostile, demotivating processes and a mentality of not seeing refugees as people but as a burden to society.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Now Geert Wilders has likely won a massive election victory in the Netherlands and is in pole position to form the next ruling coalition and possibly become the country's next prime minister.

In his first reaction, posted in a video on X, formerly Twitter, he spread his arms wide, put his face in his hands and said simply “35!” - the number of seats the poll then forecasted his party had won.

In 2009, the British government refused to let him visit the country, saying he posed a threat to “community harmony and therefore public security.” Wilders had been invited to Britain by a member of Parliament’s upper house, the House of Lords, to show his 15-minute film “Fitna,” which criticizes the Quran as a “fascist book.” The film sparked violent protests around the Muslim world in 2008 for linking Quranic verses with footage of terrorist attacks.

To court mainstream voters this time around, Wilders toned down the anti-Islam rhetoric and sought to focus less on what he calls the “de-Islamization” of the Netherlands and more on tackling hot-button issues such as housing shortages, a cost-of-living crisis and access to good health care.

His campaign platform nonetheless calls for a referendum on the Netherlands leaving the European Union, an “asylum stop” and “no Islamic schools, Qurans and mosques,” although he pledged Wednesday night not to breach Dutch laws or the country's constitution that enshrines freedom of religion and expression.

He also is a staunch supporter of Israel and advocates shifting the Embassy of the Netherlands there to Jerusalem and closing the Dutch diplomatic post in Ramallah, home of the Palestinian Authority.


The original article contains 871 words, the summary contains 271 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›