Following Libera Chat earlier post it's not surprising. Matrix Foundation, been paying Element to handle all the infrastructure of even their main matrix.org instance. They have no team of their own.
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
62 points (98.4% liked)
Open Source
31272 readers
408 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Element is starting to look really really nasty in all of this. It's disconcerting to me.
What's your concern with element?
I mainly see a funding issue for matrix.org but that's also because the people behind it always offered the service as element, not as matrix.
But what's the bigger problem with it?
In theory, for profit Element (aka New Vector) and open governance Matrix Foundation should have different motivations. But since CEO and COO of Element are part of the Matrix Foundation and how all Matrix development is mainly done by Element it raises a lot of questions. Not to mention Element having ties and taking money from law enforcement agencies.
And just recently Foundation transferred two of the Matrix servers to Element which will require CLA to contribute.
How would you like Matrix to be funded?
Sure, it raises a lot of questions but they can't or can not yet be answered negatively.
Which law enforcement agencies? That's not neccessarily bad. Tor is/was funded by the CIA.
I don't disagree that it is not a lost cause, the protocol is open, it's just everything surrounding it is iffy. The Foundation finally got a Managing Director, we will see what that brings.
Personal ties are to some London based law enforcement agencies, I don't recall specifically which ones anymore. As far as money, it's whoever wants it. That part is not concerning on its own as they're selling the service, not access, but the more worrying details you combine, the less trustworthy everything seems.
The CLA isn't that great I agree, yet there are other implementations and anyone can set up another server.
There are, but Synapse is by far the most popular and if the transfer kills the momentum of outside development due to CLA, it will doom other implementations too.
New Vector was always like that and the foundation was always "community washing" by them. The only difference is that they are running out of easy venture capital cash and thus can't afford spending much money on community goodwill any longer.
These bridges are usually self-hosted so I'm assuming this is not due to infrastructure costs but rather the bridge code maintenance issues? Do they require so much work to stay functional, are other bridges at risk of abandonment too?
The main problem here is that IRC moke libera has a lot of random ephemeral users who join once and leave soon after. For the bridge, this means creating a matrix account on the instance and either deleting it, which creates problems down the line and is inefficient, or leaving it be, which means the instance fills with a crazy number of inactive accounts really fast.
Right, I never really used IRC but always just created an account directly