this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
27 points (78.7% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3357 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pick all the bicycles in this picture? (Insert your screams.)

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PixelAlchemist@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For those that aren’t yet aware: the trade off with the technology behind eliminating bot-detection here comes with a huge compromise. That trade off is that Big Tech companies need to basically certify that your device is capable and valid in order to access a website. “They” can decide at any moment to deny you access to sites that you request, which is a massive detriment to the free and open web. It’s one step below a censored internet and it’s already started rolling out in Safari.

[–] LostCause@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

So let me guess, the point is to get rid of AdBlockers isn‘t it? I liked my iPhone, but if they fuck with AdGuard I‘ll switch. Google seems to be spearheading this though, and if they get AWS/Azure etc on board, will there be any way to escape it at all? This worries me a bit.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So... they're saying it should be up to the browser to prove that the user is a human?

That seems like a terrible idea to me..what's to stop an automated browser from just saying yes, I'm totally a human ?

[–] SerotoninSwells@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

There isn't. This article is laughable because there is an astronomical amount of bot traffic that masquerades as legitimate human traffic. Things like puppeteer extra stealth and residential proxies have made it easier to hide a bots presence on the web. Also, the tracking they allude to via fingerprinting would very much be the same whether it's a human solving a captcha or a seamless process where your browser solves one.

[–] eah@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

If they manage to standardize an attestation API, they can swiftly kill off that possibility, as well as the possibility of any new successful operating systems / device manufacturers via the natural user growth that benefited the current hegemons.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Fock off with that DRM shit

[–] unconsciousvoidling@lemmy.one 14 points 1 year ago

Ah yes googles new api with drm will make a fine solution to captcha.

[–] CactusFog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Captchas also compromise your privacy. When you run across a Captcha, the technology might keep a permanent record of your phone or computer identity that can track everywhere you go online.

Humans also fiddle with a computer mouse or move around a touch screen phone in a “very human way,” Graham-Cumming said, so the ticketing computer might scope out how the cursor is moving.

Not sure why privacy is brought up if it seems to be equally as bad?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I sure am. I wish I could just be a robot already so I fit in.

load more comments
view more: next ›