this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
324 points (99.1% liked)

Risa

6892 readers
94 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Oddbin@lemmy.world 84 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I hate that I just sat and did a spot the difference on these images. I feel like I am propping up a stereotype.

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Bottom ship doesn’t have the same body profile on the bottom of the main body (engineering?)

[–] Oddbin@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The three things I spotted were hangar bay has a fin type thing above it, there's an extra bit on the rear of the "neck" from saucer to engineering hill and the position and rake of the pylons is shorter on the Nemesis version which brings the nacelles forward a touch and opens up the rear of the engineering hill a bit.

[–] June@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

A little fin, shoulder pads, and a bit more junk in the trunk.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

I Magic-Eyed it and saw the same things. Fin, hunch back, and shifted pylons.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

We can't help ourselves.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

Meh, embrace the stereotype. I love being a Trekkie stickler. I'm also now annoyed that I realize there's a difference. :/

[–] lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

First one goes more left than the bottom one? That's me done.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

The booty on the "Nemesis" era E:

[–] WeezelHawk@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

"Fixed" the Nemesis version to include Picard's addition to the refit.

[–] leave_it_blank@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

I love the D, it's my favourite starship of all time.

But my god, the E looks beautiful!!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I didn't know until this post. Interesting.

[–] Zellith@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Same. That said, I vastly prefer the First Contact/Insurrection version. It's clearly superior in every way.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"Everyone disliked that"

[–] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago

Pretty sure First Contact was a physical model. Definitely helps to make it feel like it has more presence.

[–] Zectivi@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I never knew there was a difference. Is it just the nacelle placement and the little "hump" just aft of the saucer?

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Docking bay also sticks out more in the back in the Nemesis version

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nemesis Enterprise got booty.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

I like big docks and I cannot lie

[–] Bonehead@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

That's only because the nacelle pylons moved forward a little and got wider.

[–] Johnhones@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's a fin on the top, for aerodynamics

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Also those racing stripes make it look real sharp

[–] Zectivi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I may not be a smart person, but aerodynamics.. in space?

[–] Ummdustry@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

form drag is proportional to:

  • The denisty of the medium.
  • The velocity of the moving body (squared).

Interstellar space might be very undense, peaking at about 10^-15 kg/m^3...

However the enterprise E is very fast, with warp 9.9 being approx 20,000 c or 6 * 10^13 m/s, and that matters twice as much

This puts the overall cosmodymanic forces at Cd * 3.6 * 10^12 N/m^2 or approximately the same as experienced by a Sandworm going mach 30.

So sure why not, Einstein and Newton are dead so can't complain, and I'm pretty sure I could beat up Bill Nye.

[–] Zectivi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I have no grounds to question anything that you said, but all I can imagine is this image.

Ithis image

[–] i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Moving mass towards the center to reduce rotational inertia and increase manoeuvrability! Little changes can bring great improvements in space battles.

[–] timicin@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 11 months ago

checkout out the treball channel on youtube; they did an entire one hour episode on the differences. tldr: they're all extremely minor and there's lots of them.

[–] popcap200@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Lol now do Imperial I vs Imperial II star destroyers.

[–] Maultasche@feddit.de 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The difference is actually a bit more noticeable, as the Imperial II communications tower definitely had a different design from the Imperial I tractor beam array (on top of the bridge). The other differences between both are probably not even visible. Victory I and Victory II on the other hand, I'm not sure about the visual differences.

[–] popcap200@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't the victory 1 have the giant "wings" in an x shape in the side and the victory 2 doesn't?

[–] Maultasche@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Both versions have the atmospheric maneuvering surfaces.

Can they really open up outside of fanart? In all official artworks I've seen they look pretty connected and rigid.

[–] popcap200@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Oh wild. I didn't even know the victory 1 and 2 were canon tbh. I was thinking of it from Tie Fighter.

[–] Xbeam@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Or New Hope vs Empire Strikes Back Millennium Falcon.

[–] Maultasche@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't there something about a missing hallway inside the ship in one of the films?

[–] Xbeam@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The big difference in the models are the landing gears. In A New Hope there are only three. After that, there are five.

I don't know about the missing hallway, but now I'm curious.

[–] Maultasche@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

I can't find it anymore, but I think it was something about the second hallway to the main cargo bay.

[–] xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink 8 points 11 months ago

Nemesis version stopped skipping leg day

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I will not accept this travesty!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 11 months ago

Someone didn't read the label that said to wash the ship in cold water only and shrank the fucker.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It was cold that day, okay?