this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
92 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

34828 readers
48 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It reportedly has the capability to translate languages in real-time during voice calls, video calls, and face-to-face. The feature is said to be better than language translation on Google's Pixel Buds as the former doesn't require an active internet connection.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A device that performs live translations? Sokath, his eyes uncovered!

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

When it turns out that it will gather huge amounts of data and sell it for advertising purposes? Shaka, when the walls fell.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Claims not to need active internet connection

[–] ours@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

That's the whole point of "on-device AI". It should all be happening directly on the buds.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well I’d like to see that… so the ads will be preloaded?

[–] ours@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

"Can I have a drink please"

Will translate smoothly to:

"Can I have a cold refreshing Coca-Cola™ please?"

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Google, it's pockets laden. (meh, they already have listening devices everywhere, two more won't really make a difference)

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Sokath, his eyes covered. (Samsung has tons of phones and mics everywhere too) Does anyone actually use Bixby though?

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

They do, yes. Samsung I mean, Bixby is useless.

[–] Ryan213@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Do they come in fish varieties?

[–] Mikey_donuts@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

It's like a real life babelfish

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Does translation need actual AI?

[–] wmassingham@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, but it's a hell of a lot easier to put huge language datasets into the machine learning blender and get a model out, instead of manually programming every conceivable linguistic construction.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Oh and it likely has to do speech-to-text first, another good fit for machine learning models.

[–] FuzzChef@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago

Yes, as the semantic of words is context dependent.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Once again the buzzword "AI" is vague. It's likely a chip that runs a deep-learning-based model for translation. Deep learning has excellent results in translation

So not AI in the LLM like ChatGPT.

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

As a machine learning researcher who spends all my time with other researchers, we all hate the word "AI" used to describe LLMs also

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lets stay at LLM and not AI.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is it a feature of the Galaxy Buds or a feature of the Galaxy S24? They say this is better than the Pixel Buds because it doesn't require an internet connection, but the Pixel Buds do not have language translation at all. They're headphones you connect to a phone that has language translation, and it's the phone that needs internet to work. If it were a feature of the Galaxy Buds that would be much more impressive, but since the article doesn't say exactly, it's unlikely that the Galaxy Buds actually have real-time language translation at all and it's just phone software and marketing.

[–] Gandarf@startrek.website 6 points 11 months ago

From the article:

Apparently, Samsung's next-generation Galaxy Buds will feature on-device AI

The on-device (mentioned a few areas) would lead me to believe it's the buds themselves, despite it being also on the phone.

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

I hope they come in yellow.