this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
52 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37716 readers
290 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Will Chrome send all your PDF/images/browser history to Google cloud to provide that service?

Or will the processing be completely local to preserve privacy?

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You already knew the answer

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

Yes, but it's sad this isn't even addressed in press coverage.

[–] zerofatorial@lemmy.pt 15 points 1 year ago

Honestly if they said it would be local, would you trust them?

[–] a_statistician@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is just ensuring that companies are forced to blacklist Chrome if they want their secrets to stay secret. It's already happened at my partners workplace (power industry, federal regulations on security) - hilariously, all google cloud services are blocked, but Bing is fine (w/ automatic ChatGPT integration).

It will be very interesting to see how companies handle this type of practice in the long run.

[–] u_tamtam@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

And I'm so happy to see Firefox doing the exact opposite, with the recent inclusion of an offline translator. Though not as good as Google's yet, it's already usable and will only get better.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The issue with OCR'ing pdfs is typically that it doesn't understand the document formatting. So if you're reading a document which is formatted as two columns per page, the OCR text will be a mess.

[–] anon@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I'm willing to bet that given that most scientific papers are in that two format column, this ocr will take that into account or it's dead on arrival.

[–] DJDarren@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I have this trouble a lot when trying to digitise or refresh some of the older documentation our company uses. It often becomes easier to just recreate it, by the time you've fucked about trying to restore the formatting.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it's all about gathering content for training AI these days, isn't it?

[–] bbtai@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

This is exactly what I thought clicking on this post.

[–] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

So this is confined just to Chrome on ChromeOS it sounds like. I mean, ChromeOS was already an anti-privacy hellscape… anyway I sure hope this doesn’t spread beyond ChromeOS.

load more comments
view more: next ›