this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
217 points (94.3% liked)

News

23320 readers
2978 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago

"Are we the baddies?"

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And still people make surprised Pikachu faces when we call Israel a white supremacist settler-colonialist state.

[–] bh11235@infosec.pub -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

white supremacist

Lol. Lmao, even.

None of the 54 people who upvoted this have the first idea about how Israeli internal politics relates to white supremacy. None of them know how Likud got elected in '77, on top what of ethnic tensions. None of them know the names "Dudi Amsalem", "Miri Regev", "Galit Distel", who are high ranking ministers in the current Israeli govt (Distel quit recently), and how they built their political capital and support base on top of repeated scorn and derision for "the white tribe" which in Israel is traditionally identified with the secular liberal elites, who vote for left wing parties and try to promote left wing policies. Listen to some of the stuff that this wing of Likud says, ironically they don't sound far off from the BLM movement who of course they will tell you that they oppose in their capacity as staunch conservatives. Don't underestimate how much of Likud's power comes from exactly that fault line in Israeli society.

Go ahead and call Israel bigoted, a settler state, a colonialist project, all of these start off an argument that often Israel is going to look not so great coming out of -- but "white supremacist"? People make the surprised Pikachu face because this take is detached from physical reality. Out of what I want to believe is good intentions, you ended up shoving the square peg that is this conflict into the convenient round hole that is this narrative about colors vs. whites which has not applied since decades before the turn of the century.

FWIW I don't personally have the taste for any of this. I wish I could stop hearing about the imaginary applications of colors to Israeli internal and foreign policy, and instead start hearing more about practical plans of how to ensure security in the region and how to aim for a future where millions of Gazans don't starve. But clearly no one is asking me.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

TLDR - "Israel cannot be white supremacist because white supremacism doesn't exist."

To use your terms, Clyde:

Lol. Lmao, even.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 41 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

It's Netanyahu's whole plan in a nutshell ... raze it to the ground, then let rich Israeli's buy up the land and leave nothing for Palestinians.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There was a conspiracy theory that showed a proposed canal that will go right through Gaza (the Ben Gurion canal) that seeks to divert some of the traffic from the Suez canal.

[–] DreamerofDays@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That seems pretty bonkers, with the barest minimum knowledge of geography.

Like, look at a map level of bonkers.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not too bonkers - if you cut through Gaza, run south, between Beersheba and the Egyptian border and continue in a straight line parallel to the border you hit the Gulf of Aqaba.

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That would be like 100 miles / 200 km

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Okay. That's less than 10% of the distance across the Mediterranean.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wait, thats wasn't some absurdly sick joke?

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Oh OK that must be what I was thinking of.

Still, what the fuck is wrong with people?

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

It was played off that way at least. Follow the linked article to the twitter profile, you can see he’s deeply reprehensible and a huge booster of settlements. He would “gladly build the condos if the government allowed it” when asked for comment.

Epshtein told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz that his employees were hearing talk about the "day after" the war and one option discussed was reoccupying Gaza and reestablishing Israeli settlements there. Another post advertises "presale" lots on a map of Gaza, dividing it into regions named after the evacuated Gush Katif settlements. It also includes the settlement of "Nova," named for the Supernova rave targeted by Hamas in the Oct. 7 massacres, and "Upper Nova," which is billed as a new city for ultra-orthodox Haredi Jews.

Seems like the office staff put a little more than “15 mins for the lulz” in photoshop to mock up the house render, given that there’s community names, maps, and lot layouts. What a lovely bunch of ghouls.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 18 points 11 months ago

I was really, really hoping this was from The Onion.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

I feel sick

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

If you build it, and if the price is right, they will come. There are a lot of people who simply don't care.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Like the Russians selling property in Mariupol. Disgusting.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Those are selling dirt cheap right now, too.

[–] bh11235@infosec.pub 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The advertisement is specifically about returning to the Gaza settlements that were abandoned during the disengagement of 2005; no one in Israel right now knows what's going to happen to Gaza once the war winds down, there's no consensus even for what the Israeli public would want to happen in theory. So, while this ad is jingoistic, tasteless and not a good look, it is not some deep chess move by the Israeli govt sending the real estate industry to Jewify Gaza; it's one actor among a cacophony of competing voices, shouting "LET US UNDO THE 2005 DISENGAGEMENT THIS IS THE REAL SOLUTION". If you want to correctly argue that historically these kinds of crazies do end up having govt backing then by all means argue that, but it's better to understand the situation as it currently is.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Well this particular actor has been quite successfully "Jewifying", to use your term, the West Bank.

If you look at the increase of settlements between Oslo and Camp David, you can see why Camp David was a non-starter for the Palestinians.

Now Gaza will slowly be clawed away and the occupiers will ask why the Palestinians don't want peace.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What a blazing dumpster fire of a website.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Downvoters be like "I don't see a problem"

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

I don't see the article, personally.

And yes, I can open in an external browser with adblock, but I shouldn't have to.