this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
851 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

60111 readers
2618 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 200 Substack authors asked the platform to explain why it’s “platforming and monetizing Nazis,” and now they have an answer straight from co-founder Hamish McKenzie:

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either—we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.

While McKenzie offers no evidence to back these ideas, this tracks with the company’s previous stance on taking a hands-off approach to moderation. In April, Substack CEO Chris Best appeared on the Decoder podcast and refused to answer moderation questions. “We’re not going to get into specific ‘would you or won’t you’ content moderation questions” over the issue of overt racism being published on the platform, Best said. McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 238 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either

Actions speak louder than words. Fuck Substack and fuck any platform that offers a safe haven for nazis.

[–] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 137 points 1 year ago

"I want you to know that I don't like nazis. But I am fine platforming them and profiting from them. Now here is some bullshit about silencing 'ideas.'"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 173 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (34 children)

If there are 10 nazis at a table and you decide to sit among them, there are 11 nazis sitting at that table.

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] Synthead@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you are obligated to host a platform so shitty people can use it to share shitty ideals. It simply means that you won't get arrested on a federal level.

Websites can do whatever they want, including deciding that they don't want to be a platform for hate speech. If people are seeking a place for this conversation genre to happen, and they want it enough, they can run their own website.

Imagine if you invited a friend of a friend over, and they were sharing nasty ideals at your Christmas party. And they brought their friends. Are you just going to sit there and let them turn your dinner into a political rally? No, you're going to kick them out. It's your dinner, like it is your website. If you don't kick them out, then at some level, you're aligning with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 116 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Do not tolerate the intolerant.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 99 points 1 year ago (36 children)

Yea... Meta took the same "free peaches" approach and the entire fucking globe is now dealing with various versions of white nationalism. So like, can we actually give censorship of hate a fucking try for once? I'm willing to go down that road.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

To be clear — what McKenzie is saying here is that Substack will continue to pay Nazis to write Nazi essays. Not just that they will host Nazi essays (at Substack's cost), but they will pay for them.

They are, in effect, hiring Nazis to compose Nazi essays.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Gamers_Mate@kbin.social 86 points 1 year ago (4 children)

“we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.” I mean they are litterally Condoning bigotry.

"His response similarly doesn’t engage other questions from the Substackers Against Nazis authors, like why these policies allow it to moderate spam and newsletters from sex workers but not Nazis."

Doesn't seem very consistent.

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Substack: Nazis are cool, but you better not be selling sex related shit! We have standards!

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"We do not condone Nazi propaganda, but we are very concerned about sex work causing social degeneracy."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So substack is a pro-nazi platform run by Nazi enablers, got it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago (35 children)

This would be silly even if they didn’t moderate at all but they do. They don’t allow sex workers use their service. And we aren’t talking about “Nazis” as a code word for the far right. The complaint letter cited literal Nazis with swastika logos.

Plus, how grand are his delusions of grandeur if he thinks his fucking glorified email blast manager is the one true hope for free speech? Let the Nazis self-host an open source solution (like Ghost).

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So they are a Nazi platform. End of.

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (7 children)

If you run a bar, and Nazis hang out in your bar, you run a Nazi bar

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Nazism doesn't deserve tolerance, any person who doesn't punch it in the face is equal or worse.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (8 children)

"Let's tolerate the people that say they want to genocide entire ethnic groups" Surely nothing bad is gonna happen /s

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (8 children)

So let me get this straight... They don't like Nazis, but Nazis not making money is worse than Nazis making money?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tolerating Naziism and allowing it to use social tools to spread its hate is what makes it worse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Being a Nazi isn't a "view." It is a political movement guided by the principles of hate, violence, and genocide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

We already knew that SS liked Nazis.

All joking aside, silencing Nazis and deplatforming them is LITERALLY fighting against them. How is allowing them to make money and market themselves on your platform doing anything to stem the tide of Nazism? Obviously they're playing culture war games and saying they're not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Girru00@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.

Condone:

verb accept and allow (behavior that is considered morally wrong or offensive) to continue

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (12 children)

"We don't like or condone bigotry in any form."

...But we are happy to financially support bigotry and directly profit from it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Facebook just shrugs off the rampant white supremacist content on its platform with great success, you can literally put up a profile photo with an "It's OK to be white" frame, or "white power" supplied by Facebook. I guess Substack thinks that if it works for Facebook it should be fine for them.

Incidentally Reddit banned me for posting pictures of Nazis on r/beholdthemasterrace, a subreddit for mocking white supremacy, when some Nazis went and complained to Reddit admins I was doing it. Reddit also sides with Nazis, they're just quieter about it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

Okay fine, I'm never clicking on a substack link again.

And after say a grace period of about 6 months to move elsewhere, I'm going to assume anyone associating with the service is at best a nazi sympathiser

Go ahead, be a Nazi bar, I'm sure their money is worth it

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Is substack used in the EU? They might want to rethink their stance then...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ira@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What does Substack plan to do with the profits that it makes from hosting Nazi content?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

On one hand, Substack is in it's rights and as a journalistic organization, they are in the right.

The issue is: Once you serve a Nazi in your bar, you become a Nazi bar. This is no longer a marginalized viewpoint you can ignore. Its actively recruiting and frightening. Inaction is enabling. Substack is going to become shitty, and fast. They will lose high engagement users, first when the ones who protested pile out for another platform and then quickly when the quality dips.

Also, their cavalier attitude will change when Stripe steps in.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Napain@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 year ago

this is enablement

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 year ago (7 children)

So they have no rules, any content is acceptable?

Anything less is "censorship" after all

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] sheilzy@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Mckenzie needs to read that Reddit story about the bartender who kicked out a guy with the Third Reich eagle ensign on his shirt despite him quietly minding his own business. I really don't want Substack to "suddenly become a Nazi bar." I'm just a reader, but if I ever start a newsletter I may reconsider my platform. I am on a basic free plan for all Substack channels I read. I've thought about upgrading my subscription to some, but now I will hesitate.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it does not “make it worse”.

In fact, stamping out dissent and controlling people is incredibly effective. Ask any dictator.

Control is effective and necessary when it comes to people actively trying to damage society. No, I’m not supporting dictatorship or authoritarianism, just pointing out that control is effective.

Being a sect of destructive assholes doesn’t mean you should get a platform.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.”

― Elie Wiesel

load more comments
view more: next ›