It reflects the religious screaming about "religious freedom" only to the secular while not allowing even a thought about it when it comes to any other religion.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

India came so close, but it's clear they're moving backwards.

Oh well.

[-] Hooverx@lemm.ee -2 points 8 months ago

Democracy isn't scalable

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

This isn't a democracy issue; it's a cultural one.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

This is a fairly stupid headline. There are laws which require Muslims to prove their heritage and that they are legally residents, and no one else. There's police brutality against Muslims and their homes are destroyed. High ranking leaders talk about how Muslims are like rats and roaches spreading disease and requiring extermination. These leaders are part of Modi's Hindu nationalist party.

The incident in this article doesn't reflect an "increasingly polarized India", it presents an extremely polarized India. Fascists are using the government to spread nationalism and religious zealotry, and persecute Muslims.

[-] Hooverx@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

article brings attention to the rising anti-Muslim sentiment encouraged by Modi's government

[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 7 points 9 months ago

It's behind a pay wall. What happened?

[-] bluey@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

https://www.outlookindia.com/national/up-bus-conductor-sacked-for-letting-muslim-passengers-dies-by-suicide-news-314484

Mohit, who was a conductor in UP Roadways was suspended earlier this year, for allegedly halting a Delhi-bound bus for two passengers to offer Namaz. The UPSRTC staff and his co-driver, a contractual staff, were suspended on June 5 for halting ‘Janrath’, an air-conditioned bus headed to Kaushambi from Bareilly.  

do read - https://monyet.cc/comment/4068760

[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 months ago

Thanks.

Also, oof. That's sad.

[+] people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org -10 points 8 months ago

I mean, should abruptly halting public services for the whims of two passengers be tolerated really? What the fuck is the department supposed to do, delay the buses and just ask the working passengers with time commitments to fuck off every time someone in the bus wants to pray?

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Looking it up - Kaushambi to Bareilly, the route the bus was on, is a 5 hour drive. We're not talking about city buses with 2 minutes between each stop. Long distance routes like that generally give the driver the discretion to decide where and when to stop for toilet breaks, etc. Nobody is going to object to a break of a few minutes.

In other words, this would have been a perfectly normal rest break if not for the religious aspect. So no, the editors are not wrong.

[-] people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 8 months ago

There are designated rest breaks in those long drives. They could have completed their Namaz during those if they wanted, like everyone else. Muslims have leeway of time during situations like these, those two were very likely just entitled. Stopping an entire bus is not justified.

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There are designated rest breaks in those long drives

Source? Because my personal experience says otherwise.

those two were very likely just entitled

Do you have any reason to think so, or are you just wildly speculating? You don't even know if they made a fuss, or just very nicely asked if the driver could align the rest break with their prayer time.

[-] people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 8 months ago

Really? A bus you were on didn't stop once in a 5-hour drive in your experience?

My reason to think so is Occam's Razor. Asshole passengers are much, much more probable than an official abruptly deciding to fire a bus conductor just because he stopped the bus for a Muslim's prayers. It's idiotic and only people who have never truly lived in India can make such assertions.

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Really? A bus you were on didn’t stop once in a 5-hour drive in your experience?

That's not what I said. I said the driver has discretion over where and when to stop during the drive. You're the one claiming otherwise.

Occam’s Razor

So you pulled it out of your ass, got it. I love how you dispute the article on the basis of 'it's more probable'. Who cares about facts, eh?

only people who have never truly lived in India can make such assertions.

That's funny, seeing as the article was written by Indians.

[-] auroraborealiz@sopuli.xyz 0 points 8 months ago

(yes)

[+] Paragone@lemmy.world -15 points 8 months ago

It reflects on the increasing-polarization of ALL HUMANKIND.

Read Daniel Kahneman's "Thinking Fast & Slow", & recognize that Kahneman System-2, considered-reasoning, is being blotted-out by Kahneman System-1, animal reaction, and that this is exactly how #ClimatePunctuation, which is still accelerating, combines with regional-crop-failures, megadroughts, megaflooding, region-scouring wildfire, political-tantrum, religious-tantrum, corruption, etc, to blot out survival-viability, when a world-species crosses the threshold of the multiple-industrial-revolutions.

This is The Great Filter, setting-up.

Rampagins reaction, enforcing its lashing-out with all weapons available, is exactly what is becoming normaller & normaller, in all regions, in all political-stripes, in all religions.

There will be no considered-reasoning ruling this world before the end of this century, unless a significant portion of this planet's population grow TF up, with all we got, quick.

Moneyarchy is pushing to eradictate Kahneman System-2, because considered-reasoning competes against moneyarchy's preference for humankind to be managed steers, being consumed by the money-machine, without interference.

Legalism's been pushing against considered-reasoning since before the Christian New Testament.

Etc.

See it for what it is: our unconsciousmind is trying to beat, and BREAK considered-reasoning from interfering with it, and "politics" is just makup hiding the underlying-appearance.

So is "religion".

So is "culture".

Notice that Kahneman tells us, outright, System-1 operates in the addiction/prejudice mode of WYSIATI, or What You See Is All There Is.

NO considering context is TOLERATED by System-1.

And that is how The Great Filter silences worlds which reach the cascades-of-technology-development that we're in.

Ignorance uses the weapons to beat/break whole-world-life, in order to PROVE that unconscious-ignorance was the exclusive "lord", and it NEVER had to learn,

and the people weren't up to breaking that unconscious-ignorance.

Same as an addict/junkie whose unconsciousmind, their System-1, would rather break their entire life, than tolerate growing-up/breaking-addiction... and they die.

Worlds do it.

We're in the century that will see .. nearly-nobody survive, if any do.

IF you see it in Hindus, THEN I guarantee you it can also be seen in every other religous-group in this planet, this century, this decade.

There is nothing unique about it happening "here" or "there".

Unconscious-ignorance-addiction, and its prejudice against considered-reasoning/System-1, is taking-over.

And our world is going along with it.

And that is species-fatal.

_ /\ _

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023

270 points (93.3% liked)

World News

38583 readers

1727 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.