this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024

117 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

59429 readers

2874 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

117

NASA Astronauts Won't Step Foot on the Moon Until September 2026 at the Earliest - IGN (www.ign.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Live_Let_Live@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago (4 children)

We could just as easily dump the billions we do in weapons on space...

It would "stimulate the economy" just as much, while blowing up far fewer people, and they wouldn't even be blown up intentionally.

There's as much time between the Wright bros and the moon landing, as there will be between the first and next.

We could be so much fucking further.

[–] MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Check out the show For All Mankind. It’s an alternate timeline where the Soviets beat the US to the moon and the space race doesn’t end.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

I’m halfway through Season 2. What a ride!

[–] USSEthernet@startrek.website 4 points 10 months ago

Seconded, great show

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Split it between humanitarian/environmental missions and space missions. The Army and Navy have astounding logistics systems that could be used to distribute resources, while the USAF and USSF focus on exploration.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

We do some of that already.

I spent a couple months in South America going port to port. We had a bunch of military doctors from other countries even.

Just show up and give aid for like a week then off to another one.

[–] Live_Let_Live@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

ever since the assassination of JFK this country has gone downhill

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social -5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The idea of weaponizing space.....UGH, what a phenomenal proof that human beings don't deserve to continue as a race. What a complete sewer we've made of everything we touch.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

...

I meant instead of spending it on rockets that blow up humans, we spend it on rockets that (hopefully safely) launches human into space.

Not that we should blow people up from space

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

I get that, I didn't mean to sound like I was disagreeing with you. Just making a comment in general about weaponization of everything. I would hope that we value outer space as a peaceful frontier and not a place to blow each other up.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Okay I straight up didn’t know IGN was doing reporting on things other than games now, interesting

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago

"Putin's invasion of Ukraine is reprehensible, bloodthirsty, and a clear example of state gangsterism. Accordingly, we given given him a score of 7.3."

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

[+] tygerprints@kbin.social -15 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Yet somehow we effortlessly went to the moon and back again in 1969 with absolutely no hiccups and pretty good TV imagery, even though we can't broadcast from halfway around the world today without interference, and we can't figure out how to get to the moon - somehow we magically did it all in 1969. What a time it was to be alive back then.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, fucktons of money can do amazing things very quickly. Unfortunately, NASA doesn't have that anymore.

All the footage you see now of the old moon missions is direct from the cameras, not broadcast footage. The first steps were broadcasted using a camera pointed at a monitor in Australia which was receiving an SSTV signal from the moon. It was actually pretty horrible.

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well maybe that was the big difference after all. I'm not saying the moon landing didn't happen, only that it's weird we could do it back then - when you'd think we would've come farther and closer to doing it again by now.

I certainly want to see us not just return to the moon but go farther and farther.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

We wasted 30 years puttering around low Earth orbit with the space shuttle without making any real progress at all, meanwhile all the old Apollo engineers have retired or passed away, and the infrastructure to build everything doesn't exist anymore (for instance, the F-1 engine. To build that again, you'd have to rebuild all the tooling and test equipment that was used to make it as well). So we basically have to almost start from scratch.

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Sad but true. I only hope it happens because, I want my moon mansion and moon maidens.

[–] wmassingham@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Effortlessly? No hiccups? The Apollo program alone cost $178 billion 2022 dollars between 1961 and 1972. And I'm pretty sure that they had at least one hiccup. And that doesn't even count the other programs like Mercury or Gemini.

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

I was being a little facetious, as in, they made it SEEM like it was effortless and no hiccups. I remember watching it all on TV, it did have more than few hiccups, but they packaged as if it was all seamless and "meant to happen."

[–] Chaser@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say it was effortless lol

[–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's so much ignorance in this comment, it's got to be bait...right?

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social -3 points 10 months ago

Read it however you wish, makes no never mind to me at all.

[–] damndotcommie@lemmy.basedcount.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

with absolutely no hiccups

So are you ignoring Apollo 13? How about Apollo 1? And what are you on about not being able to broadcast from halfway around the world??? Do you watch evening news, because I see reports from all over the world on a daily basis.

[–] tygerprints@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

I was just exaggerating the way that the moon landing was presented to us back in 1969. If you weren't there you probably wouldn't understand how 'without a hiccup' was exactly the way it was presented to us. I'm sure there were hiccups on a grand scale, but they were mostly kept from the public.