πππ
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
Here in Denmark, that would be actively illegal. I think the same is true for most of EU. It may be allowed in Cooperate America, but I doubt it's required. But that would be for Americans to decide.
Bold to assume us Americans can actually choose our laws.
As a collective yes, as an individual no.
If by "collective" you mean "minority lead by the rich and corporations", then sure
Technically, the collective could change it, if a super massive majority agreed and actually did something about it, but that's not gonna happen, sadly
I invite you to read the truth of US politics. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC
False. At most, they should bring specific evidence of an actual crime to have authorities obtain a warrant. They can fuck all the way off til then.
If you read the article it states at the film studio wants the IP address is to prove that Frontier is not doing anything about people pirating on their ISP. They claim that they aren't going after the individuals themselves. The headline is deceptively vague.
And reddit still shouldn't release the IP address of specific users without a warrant.
But they are indirectly going after these individuals. They just want Frontier to handle the punishments rather than doing it themselves.
Well you probably couldnβt go after someone individually with that kind of information, realistically. Most consumer grade connections have dynamic IPs. So the IP of user posting to reddit isnβt actually uniquely identifying. Your ISP could match which customer had which IP at a specific point in time, but if point in time youβre tying the IP to is when a given user posted a discussion about pirating, that doesnβt actually correlate to actual pirate activity happening at that time.
Oh sure, trust that they won't abuse that data. That's unheard of. It's not like there's a ton of ways to abuse that info, I swear!
πππ
Beat it fuckers
Even with ip's they'd still struggle to do much other than send out threatening letters.
Anybody else see this and go, βitβs the Little Al keyboard!β
This is the best summary I could come up with:
For the third time in less than a year, film studios with copyright infringement complaints against a cable Internet provider are trying to force Reddit to share information about users who have discussed piracy on the site.
In the first instance, US Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler ruled in the US District Court for the Northern District of California that the First Amendment right to anonymous speech meant Reddit didnβt have to disclose the names, email addresses, and other account registration information for nine Reddit users.
Film companies, including Bodyguard Productions and Millennium Media, had subpoenaed Reddit in relation to a copyright infringement lawsuit against Astound Broadband-owned RCN about subscribers allegedly pirating 34 movie titles, including Hellboy (2019), Rambo V: Last Blood, and Tesla.
In her ruling, Beeler noted that while the First Amendment right to anonymous speech is not absolute, the film producers had already received the names of 118 Grande subscribers.
She also said the film producers had failed to prove that βthe identifying information is directly or materially relevant or unavailable from another source.β
This week, as reported by TorrentFreak, film companies Voltage Holdings, which are part of the previous two subpoenas, and Screen Media Ventures, another film studio with litigation against RCN, filed a motion to compel [PDF] Reddit to respond to the subpoena in the US District Court for the Northern District of California.
The original article contains 588 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!