Fox Host Confronts Vivek: Trump ‘Threw You Under the Bus’ (www.thedailybeast.com)

submitted 9 months ago by Mazdak@lemmy.org to c/politics@lemmy.world

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 51 points 9 months ago

I'm having a hard time caring who the right wing in Iowa thinks should be president. Looking at recent history, they usually pick someone that will go on to lose the nomination. They may indeed pick this idiot. Hell they picked Cruz, Huckabee and Santorum 3 of the last 4 (they appear to be political idiots). Who cares what they think?

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

In the same vein, the Democratic nominee is heavily judged based on how they perform in South Carolina which doesn't vote blue in the general election. Caring what small amounts of largely irrelevant voters think while ignoring the majority is apparently one of our favorite things as a nation.

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

I can't disagree. Dems seem to believe (rightly or wrongly) that whoever wins the nom in SC will have the majority black vote in the general election.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, the way elections are run in this country is become more and more tragicomic with time. Even decades ago, I wondered just how the hell we were looking to places like Iowa for our future. Not that people in Iowa are inherently bad or anything, but as far as being strategically important? Let me know when they have a population that approaches California, or a GDP.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com -2 points 9 months ago

Iowans picking Cruz, and him winning, is in spite of their choice.

He won, again, because the political landscape was in his favor: it was an off-year, his opponent made a public gaffe about gun control, and lots of conservative Californians had been moving to Texas. Cruz is not a popular politician in Texas, but because there were lots of transplants who hadn't truly experienced his bullshit, they voted for him. Couple that with often-lower turnout in off-year elections and the gun comment, and you have a recipe for a winning strategy.

This time, Cruz is on the ticket for the Presidential Election, Californians are moving to Florida, and Millennials and Gen Z are actually turning up to vote. It doesn't matter what Iowans think, and he should be worried.

[-] mirror_slap@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

The candidates from the GOP smell like my Son's dirty diapers. The only difference between them is the color of the poo.

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Well at least one of them is the Biggest Loser they have ever seen so they have that going for them

[-] Binthinkin@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago

Vivek is such a pos human that even GTAV RP has him as a shit bag character! He already got arrested and charged for fraud and is not allowed to be mayor.

But seriously folks Vivek is really a pathetic, shit eating, human waste of space. The people who bow to Trump and his tactics ALL have dirt somewhere on them. It’s the only thing that makes sense at this point.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

No one likes Vivek. I think the only thing he's proven is that it's actually possible to be more repulsive than Trump.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

What's to like about an opportunistic grifter? Especially one that cozies up to fascist movements.

But the two main reasons the MAGAs don't like him/will stop liking him are that he's obviously too brown for them, and their Golden Calf has now declared that he's not MAGA, which is pretty much the kiss of death for a grifter like him.

[-] Justas@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

Ever since he betrayed Nerevar, he went downhill in my eyes.

[-] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I haven't made this connection yet, but thank you so much for forcing my brain to do it.

this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024

98 points (94.5% liked)

politics

19097 readers

4671 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News