this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
47 points (94.3% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2351 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

SEOUL, Jan. 30 (Yonhap) -- The defense ministry said Tuesday it is not considering conscripting women for the country's mandatory military service after the issue received renewed attention in a campaign pledge ahead of the April general elections.

On Monday, the leader of the newly created Reformative Conservative Party, Lee Jun-seok, proposed having women serve in the military first if they want to apply for jobs as police officers or firefighter as a campaign pledge.

When asked about the possibility of female conscription, the ministry's spokesperson Jeon Ha-kyou denied considering it.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] halflife39@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

In South Korea, all able-bodied men must serve mandatory military service for at least 18 months, while women can volunteer for military duty as officers or noncommissioned officers.

I wonder why the Korean government doesn't draft women. According to the article, women can serve in the military as non-commissioned officers or officers, but don't non-commissioned officers and officers need more physical abilities and skills than regular soldiers?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

No. Officers and NCOs are more managers.

The higher rank you have the more paperwork you do. Especially if you aren't in a front line trade.

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 3 points 9 months ago

Presumably they women will need to stay back and improve the country’s anaemic birth rate

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

And I am sure the south korean public will have a calm and thoughtful discussion about it.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How the fuck does military experience benefit a fire fighter?

[–] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 13 points 9 months ago

Team work 🤷. Military training is more than just firing guns

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Well, the whole "ability to preform in stressful and adverse conditions" comes quickly to mind.