this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
92 points (87.1% liked)

politics

24922 readers
3673 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump was not on the ballot, so Trump's supporters voted for "none of these candidates"

So, no, Politico, you steaming pile of shit, it's not worse than people can imagine; people can easily imagine Haley losing to Trump.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

An Indian woman, with immigrant parents, who likes Hillary… beating an old rich man in a right-wing race?

You don’t say… ;)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It really wasn't much of an embarrassment considering primary voting in Nevada is meaningless and it's all chosen through separate caucuses.

Haley didn't spend any money in Nevada specifically because it was already rigged for Trump.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/nevadas-dueling-primary-caucuses-underway/story?id=106961691

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So when is she going to start winning these races against Trump? If she wants to be the Republican nominee in 2024 she's going to have to start doing that eventually, but everything I've read says she's got almost no chance in South Carolina and I don't think it gets any better for her after her home state.

On the other hand, if she doesn't really care about winning in 2024 and is just getting her name out there for 2028, this "hey, remember that time Haley lost to none of the above?" meme could hurt her.

[–] Argongas@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

She's not going to beat him in the primary, however there's a not insignificant chance that Trump flames out (disqualification or conviction) and she'll be the only candidate left with some delegates and she'll default her way into the nomination.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think this Republican party is ever going to disqualify Trump no matter what he gets convicted of, but I suppose he's due for a stroke or heart attack or something like that

But even still, couldn't the GOP delegates pledged to Trump just pick another candidate if he's unavailable? Might be a second round of voting at their convention situation, but I think if no one candidate clenches a majority the first time around the delegates can start siding with whoever they want, and I feel like there's going to be at least a few of them with grudges against Haley (like, it doesn't take a whole lot for Republicans to start hating women to begin with)

[–] macattack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It's worth noting that the DeSantis didn't end his campaign as much as suspended so if Trump drops out I believe he can restart his campaign without any legal issues, right?

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's... not the worst strategy.

[–] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

It really wasn't much of an embarrassment considering primary voting in Nevada is meaningless and it's all chosen through separate caucuses.

she chose to put her name in the primary ballot. and in nevada since they're having a primary and caucus you could only enter one. what was the plan here? if it was to show she's got general election appeal that was a massive failure. and it's totally embarrassing, trump wanted a caucus and he got one. and trump's name is the only one to be voted on, where the delegates will be awarded. that's not just a stupid strategy it's a losing one.

Haley didn't spend any money in Nevada specifically because it was already rigged for Trump.

if that was the case she shouldn't bother running. the entire republican primary process was rigged in favor of trump.