US says Chinese spy balloon downed in February did not collect information. Yet, Biden was referring to it as a spy balloon just this month. (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

Can we have a policy here of not rewriting/making up titles? I'm not interested on personal takes before reaching the comments section.

[-] k_o_t@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

i kinda agree with /u/u_tamtam, it's standard practice to not change titles when posting articles to link aggregators, so most users (reasonably so) operate off of the assumption that the titles aren't altered

this gets esp confusing, when ppl change the headlines only slightly

load more comments (8 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not understanding the contradiction here. They're saying it was a spy balloon for spying but that it failed at its task. Not sure how true that is, no way for me to tell but there's no inherent paradox here.

load more comments (61 replies)

load more comments